Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:42:15.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

READING MAUD'S REMAINS: TENNYSON, GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES, AND PALAEONTOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2014

Michelle Geric
Michelle Geric*
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As Tennyson's “little Hamlet,”Maud (1855) posits a speaker who, like Hamlet, confronts the ignominious fate of dead remains. Maud's speaker contemplates such remains as bone, hair, shell, and he experiences his world as one composed of hard inorganic matter, such things as rocks, gems, flint, stone, coal, and gold. While Maud's imagery of “stones, and hard substances” has been read as signifying the speaker's desire “unnaturally to harden himself into insensibility” (Killham 231, 235), I argue that these substances benefit from being read in the context of Tennyson's wider understanding of geological processes. Along with highlighting these materials, the text's imagery focuses on processes of fossilisation, while Maud's characters appear to be in the grip of an insidious petrification. Despite the preoccupation with geological materials and processes, the poem has received little critical attention in these terms. Dennis R. Dean, for example, whose Tennyson and Geology (1985) is still the most rigorous study of the sources of Tennyson's knowledge of geology, does not detect a geological register in the poem, arguing that by the time Tennyson began to write Maud, he was “relatively at ease with the geological world” (Dean 21). I argue, however, that Maud reveals that Tennyson was anything but “at ease” with geology. While In Memoriam (1851) wrestles with religious doubt that is both initiated, and, to some extent, alleviated by geological theories, it finally affirms the transcendence of spirit over matter. Maud, conversely, gravitates towards the ground, concerning itself with the corporal remains of life and with the agents of change that operate on all matter. Influenced by his reading of geology, and particularly Charles Lyell's provocative writings on the embedding and fossilisation of organic material in strata in his Principles of Geology (1830–33) volume 2, Tennyson's poem probes the taphonomic processes that result in the incorporation of dead remains and even living flesh into the geological system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 59 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Beesemyer, Basey Irene. “‘Black with the void from which God himself has disappeared’: Spatial Displacement in Tennyson's Maud.” Tennyson Research Bulletin 7.4 (2000) 174–92.Google Scholar
Campbell, Nancie, ed. Tennyson in Lincoln. Lincoln: Tennyson Research Society, 1971.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Historical Sketches of Notable Persons and Events in the Reigns of James I. and Charles I. Ed. Carlyle, Alexander. London: Chapman and Hall, 1898.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. Latter-Day Pamphlets. London: Chapman and Hall, 1850.Google Scholar
Dawson, Gowan. “Literary Megatheriums and Loose Baggy Monsters: Paleontology and the Victorian Novel.” Victorian Studies 53.2 (2011): 203–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Dennis R. Tennyson and Geology. Lincoln: Tennyson Research Centre, 1985.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. L. “Gem Imagery in Tennyson's Maud.” Victorian Poetry 17 (1979): 389–94.Google Scholar
Killham, John. “Tennyson's Maud: The Function of the Imagery.” Critical Essays on the Poetry of Tennyson. Ed. Killham, John. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964. 219–35.Google Scholar
Lang, Cecil Y., and Shannon, Edgar F. Jr., eds. The Letters of Alfred Lord Tennyson II 1851–1870. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar
Lutz, Deborah. “The Dead Still Among Us: Victorian Secular Relic, Hair Jewellery, and Death Culture.” Victorian Literature and Culture 39.1 (2011): 127–42.Google Scholar
Lyell, Charles. Elements of Geology. London: John Murray, 1838.Google Scholar
Lyell, Charles. Principles of Geology.1830-33. Rpt. 1st ed. 3 vols. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990.Google Scholar
Mangles, James Henry. Tennyson at Aldworth: the Diary of James Henry Mangles. Ed. Knies, Earl A.. Athens: U of Ohio P, 1984.Google Scholar
Mann, Robert James. Tennyson's ‘Maud’ Vindicated: An Explanatory Essay. London: Jarrold & Sons, 1856.Google Scholar
Mantell, Gideon. The Wonders of Geology: Or, A Familiar Exposition of Geological Phenomena. London: Relfe and Fletcher, 1838. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Marshall, Nancy Rose. “A Dim World, Where Monsters Dwell”: The Spatial Time of the Sydenham Crystal Palace Dinosaur Park.” Victorian Studies 49. 2 (2007): 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Richard. Geology and Inhabitants of the Ancient World. London: Crystal Palace Library and Bradbury & Evans, 1854.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. Lectures on the Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Vertebrate Animals. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1846. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Owen, Richard. The Life of Richard Owen. London: John Murray, 1894. Vol. 1Google Scholar
Piggott, Jan. Palace of the People: The Crystal Palace at Sydenham 1854–1939. London: Hurst, 2004.Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. Tennyson. Basingstoke: McMillan, 1989.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin. Georges Cuvier, Fossil Bones, and Geological Catastrophes. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin. The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Palaeontology. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin. Scenes From Deep Time. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas. Richard Owen: Biology Without Darwin, a Revised Edition. 2009. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994.Google Scholar
Shatto, Susan, ed. Tennyson's Maud: The Definitive Edition. London: Athlone, 1986.Google Scholar
Shires, Linda M. “Maud, Masculinity and Poetic Identity.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 29.3 (1987): 269–90.Google Scholar
Warwick, Slinn, E.. The Discourse of Self in Victorian Poetry. London: Macmillan, 1991.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred. Tennyson's Maud: The Definitive Edition. Ed. Shatto, Susan. London: Athlone, 1986.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Charles. Alfred Tennyson. London: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar
Tennyson Hallam, T.Alfred Lord Tennyson: A Memoir by his Son. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1897.Google Scholar
Tennyson Hallam, T., ed. Tennyson and his Friends. London: Macmillan: 1911.Google Scholar
Thesing, William B. “Tennyson and the City: Historical Tremors and Hysterical Tremblings.” Tennyson Research Bulletin 3.1 (1977): 14–22.Google Scholar
Timko, Michael. Carlyle and Tennyson. Iowa City: Iowa UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Tomko, Michael. “Varieties of Geological Experience: Religion, Body, and Spirit in Tennyson's In Memoriam and Lyell's Principles of Geology.” Victorian Poetry 2.2 (2004): 113–33.Google Scholar
Turner, Paul. Tennyson: Routledge Author Guides. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.Google Scholar
Ulrich, John M. “Thomas Carlyle, Richard Owen, and the Paleontological Articulation of the Past.” Journal of Victorian Culture 11.1 (2006): 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wordsworth, Jonathan. “‘What is it, that has been done?’: the Central Problem of Maud.” Essays in Criticism 24 (1974): 356–62.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Virginia. Excavating Victorians. New York: New York State UP, 2008.Google Scholar