Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:15:19.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GIFTS AND INTERESTS: JOHN HALIFAX, GENTLEMAN AND THE PURITY OF BUSINESS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Silvana Colella
Affiliation:
University of Macerata, Italy

Extract

IN HIS INTRODUCTION to The Question of the Gift, Mark Osteen claims that “economism … is the land mine of gift theory” (5). For many theorists, he explains, gift-giving and market exchanges share the same forms of calculation; for others, more specifically, self-interest is the “objective truth” of the gift. The challenge that gift discourse has taken up in recent years is how to rethink reciprocity, altruism, and generosity while at the same time avoiding both the “Scylla of sentimentality and the Charybdis of economism” (Osteen 31). In this paper I discuss Dinah Mulock Craik's mid-Victorian bestseller, John Halifax, Gentleman (1856), using gift theory (or some insights thereof) as my main analytical tool. Why is gift theory relevant to the understanding of a novel that openly extols the advantages of self-help and economic individualism?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams James Eli. 1995. Dandies and Desert Saints. Styles of Victorian Masculinity. Ithaca: Cornell UP
Alexander James, Todd John, Sprague William, Tyng Stephen, Ferris Isaac, Stearns Jonathan, eds. 1872. The Man of Business Considered in Six Aspects, A Book for Young Men. Edinburgh: William P. Nimmo.
Amariglio Jack. “Give the ghost a chance! A comrade's shadowy addendum.” Osteen 26779.
Appadurai Arjun, ed. 1986. The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Arnsperger Christian. “Gift-Giving Practice and Noncontextual Habitus: How (not) to be fooled by Mauss.” Vandevelde 7191.
Bourdieu Pierre. 1980. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford UP
Bourdieu Pierre. 1997. “Marginalia – Some additional notes on the gift.” The Logic of the Gift. Ed. A. Scriftt. London: Routledge
Bourdieu Pierre. 1994. Raisons Pratiques. Paris: Editions du Seuil
Callari Aantonio. “The ghost of the gift: the unlikelihood of economics.” Osteen 24965.
Colella Silvana. 2004: “‘There are no gains without pains’: the business ideal in Victorian culture.” Textus 17 35770.Google Scholar
Craik Dinah Mulock. 1876. “Beneficence or Benevolence.” Sermons out of Church. Toronto and Detroit: Belford Brothers, 11335.
Craik Dinah Mulock. 1856. John Halifax, Gentleman London: Dent, 1961.
Dauton Martin. “‘Gentlemanly Capitalism’ and British Industry, 1820–1914.” Past and Present 122 (Feb. 1989): 11958.
Douglas Mary. “Forward: No Free Gifts.” Mauss ixxxiii.
Fennell Lee Anne. “Unpacking the gift: illiquid goods and empathetic dialogue.” Osteen 85101.
Frow John. 1997. Time and Commodity Culture. Essays in Cultural Theory and Postmodernity. Oxford: Clarendon
Glifford Terry. 1999. Pastoral. London: Routledge
Godbout Jacques. “Homo Donator versus Homo Economicus.” Vandevelde 2346.
Gregory Chris. “Value Switching and the Commodity Free Zone.” Vandevelde 95113.
Helsinger Elizabeth. 1997. Rural Scenes and National Representation: Britain, 1815–1850. Princeton: Princeton UP
Hunt Freeman. 1857. Worth and Wealth. A Collection of Maxims, Morals and Miscellanies for Merchants and Men of Business. New York: Stringer and Townsend
Hutton R. H. “Novels by the Authoress of John Halifax.” North British Review 29 (Nov. 1858): 25362.
Hyde Lewis. 1999. The Gift. Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. London: Vintage
James Henry. 1968. Notes and Reviews. 1921. Freeport: Books for Libraries
James Simon. 2003. Unsettled Accounts: Money and Narrative in the Novels of George Gissing. London: Anthem
Kopytoff Igor. “The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process.” Appadurai 6491.
Martin Frances. 22 October 1887: “Mrs. Craik.” Atheneum 96263.Google Scholar
Mauss Marcel. 2002. The Gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (1954). London: Routledge
McKendrick Neil. 1986. “‘Gentleman and Players’ revisited: the gentlemanly ideal, the business ideal and the professional ideal in English literary culture.” Business Life and Public Policy. Ed. N. McKendrick and R. B. Outwhite. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 98136.
Mitchell Sally. 1983. Dinah Mulock Craik. Boston: Twayne Publisher
Moretti Franco. 1994. Opere mondo. Saggio sulla forma epica da Faust a Cent'anni di solitudine. Torino: Einaudi
Nagel James. 1996. “John Halifax, Gentleman and the Literary Courtship of Clarence and Grace.” Earnest Hemingway: The Oak Park Legacy. Ed. James Nagel. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 5969.
Osteen Mark, ed. 2002. The Question of the Gift. Essays across Disciplines. London: Routledge
O'Tool Tess. “Adoption and the ‘Improvement of the Estate’ in Trollope and Craik.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 52 (June 1997): 5879.
Parry Jonathan, & Maurice Bloch, eds. 1989. Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Rothschild Emma. 2001. Economic Sentiments. Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment, Cambridge: Harvard UP
Sahlins Marshall. “The Spirit of the Gift.” Schrift 7099.
Schrift Alan. ed. 1997. The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. London: Routledge
Showalter Elaine. 1975: “Dinah Mulock Craik and the Tactics of Sentiment: A Case Study in Victorian Female Authorship.” Feminist Studies 2 523.Google Scholar
Snyder Katherine. 1999. Bachelors, Manhood and the Novel, 1850–1925. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Spilka Mark. “Victorian Keys to the Early Hemingway: Part 1 – John Halifax, Gentleman.” Journal of Modern Literature 10 (March 1983): 12550.
Stearns Jonathan. “Men of Business: Their Intellectual Culture.” Alexander, et al. 13776.
Todd John. “Men of Business: Their Position, Influence, and Duties.” Alexander, et al. 5193.
Tyng Stephen. “Men of Business: Their Perplexities and Temptations.” Alexander, et al. 95135.
Vandevelde Antoon, ed. 2000. Gifts and Interests. Leuven: Peeters
Waters Karen Volland, 1997. The Perfect Gentleman: Masculine Control in Victorian Men's Fiction. Peter Lang: New York
Weiner Annette. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: U of California P
Wiener Martin. 1985. English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Zlotnick Susan. 1989. Women Writing and the Industrial Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP