Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:52:00.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FABIAN SOCIALISM AND THE RHETORIC OF GENTILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Rosemary Jann*
Affiliation:
George Mason University

Extract

After Sidney and Beatrice Webb founded the New Statesman in 1913, one of their inaugural projects was a series of short articles entitled “What is Socialism?,” which ran from April through September of that year. A telling example of their attempts to frame the debate occurs in installment twelve, in which they liken choosing equality as a social ideal with “teach[ing] ourselves to be gentlemen” and instituting a new “national standard of good manners” (364). They struck a similar note in The Decay of Capitalist Civilisation (1923), condemning capitalist competition as inherently vulgar (36) and tracing “the democratic conception of good manners” to those “strata of society where a practical equality of material circumstances happens to prevail, and social position depends” upon circumstances other than wealth (40). This seemingly anomalous mix of socialism and the behavioral conventions of gentility signals a broader rhetorical strategy employed by the Webbs and other Fabian spokesmen to promote their political brand from the 1880s on.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Alexander, Sally. “The Fabian Women's Group: 1908–52.” Becoming a Woman: And Other Essays in 19th and 20th Century Feminist History. New York: New York UP, 1995. 149–58.Google Scholar
Browne, Maurice, and Munro, Harold. Proposals for a Voluntary Nobility. N.p.: Samurai, 1907.Google Scholar
Burn, W. L.The Age of Equipoise: A Study of the Mid-Victorian Generation. New York: Norton, 1964.Google Scholar
Caudwell, Christopher. “George Bernard Shaw: A Study of the Bourgeois Superman.” Studies and Further Studies in a Dying Culture. New York: Monthly Review, 1971. 119.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.Google Scholar
Crossick, Geoffrey. “From Gentlemen to the Residuum: Languages of Social Description in Victorian Britain.” Language, History and Class. Ed. Corfield, Penelope J.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991. 150–78.Google Scholar
Drage, Geoffrey. “Mrs. Sidney Webb's Attack on the Labour Commission.” Nineteenth Century 36 (1894): 452–67.Google Scholar
“First Public Conference on Mr. H. G. Wells’ ‘Samurai’.” The New Age 2 April 1907: 9–11. Web. 1 August 2012.Google Scholar
Gilmour, Robin. The Idea of the Gentleman in the Victorian Novel. London: Allen & Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar
Gowan, Peter. “The Origins of the Administrative Elite.” New Left Review 162 (1987): 434.Google Scholar
Griffith, Gareth. Socialism and Superior Brains: The Political Thought of Bernard Shaw. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1993.Google Scholar
Harrison, Royden. The Life and Times of Sidney and Beatrice Webb: 1858–1905, The Formative Years. New York: St. Martin's, 2000.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. “The Fabians Reconsidered.” Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour. New York: Basic Books, 1964. 250–71.Google Scholar
Kitson Clark, George. “The New Politics and the New Gentry.” The Making of Victorian England. 1962. New York: Atheneum, 1967.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Norman Ian, and MacKenzie, Jeanne. The Fabians. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1977.Google Scholar
Perkin, Harold. The Origins of Modern English Society 1780–1880. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
Perkin, Harold. The Rise of Professional Society: England Since 1880. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “The Bitter Cry of the Middle Classes.” 1906. Practical Politics 1522.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “The Case for Equality.” 1913–14. Practical Politics 122–44.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. Collected Letters. Ed. Laurence, Dan H.. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1965.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “The Fabian Society: What It Has Done and How It Has Done It.” 1892. Essays in Fabian Socialism. London: Constable, 1932. 123–60.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “A Foreword to the Clerks from Bernard Shaw.” Trade Unionism for Clerks. Ed. Lloyd, James Henry and Scouller, R. E.. London: Palmer and Hayward, 1919. 510.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. The Illusions of Socialism, Together with Socialism: Principles and Outlook. 1897, 1929. London: Shaw Society, 1956.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism. London: Constable, 1928.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “On Driving Capital Out of the Country.” 1907–8. Practical Politics 50–83.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. Misalliance. Bernard Shaw: Complete Plays with Prefaces. 1910. Vol. 4. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1963. 1204.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. Practical Politics: Twentieth-Century Views on Politics and Economics. Ed. Hubenka, Lloyd J.. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1976.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. Report on Fabian Policy: Fabian Tract 70. London: Fabian Society, 1896.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. The Revolutionist's Handbook. Addendum to Man and Superman, 1903. Bartleby.com. Web. 10 April 2009.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “Sixty Years of Fabianism.” Fabian Essays. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1948. 207–31.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “Socialism and Superior Brains.” 1894, 1909. Essays in Fabian Socialism. London: Constable, 1932. 251–83.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “Socialism for Millionaires.” 1896. Essays in Fabian Socialism. London: Constable, 1932. 101–21.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “A Socialist Program: The Gentle Art of Unpleasantness.” 1907. Practical Politics 3–49.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. “What About the Middle Class?: A Lay Sermon.” 1912. Practical Politics 109–16.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H.The Acquisitive Society. 1920. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1948.Google Scholar
Webb, Beatrice. My Apprenticeship. 1926. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Webb, Beatrice. Our Partnership. New York: Longmans, Green, 1948.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney. Education for National Efficiency: The Contribution of Sidney and Beatrice Webb. Ed. Brennan, E. J. T.. London: Athlone, 1975.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney. Socialism in England. 1889. 3rd ed.London: Sonnenschein, 1901.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney. The Works Manager to-Day; an Address Prepared for a Series of Private Gatherings of Works Managers. London: Longmans, Green, 1918.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice. The Decay of Capitalist Civilisation. 1923. 3rd ed.London: George Allen and Unwin, 1923.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice. “Special Supplement on Professional Associations.” New Statesman 9 (1917): 148.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice. “What is Socialism?New Statesman 1 (1913): 1315, 364–66.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought. 1901. Mineola, New York: Dover, 1999.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.Experiment in Autobiography. New York: Macmillan, 1934.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.A Modern Utopia. 1905. The Works of H. G. Wells. Vol. 9. New York: Scribner's, 1925. 1331.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.The New Machiavelli. 1919. Ed. MacKenzie, Norman. London: Dent, 1994.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.The Research Magnificent. 1915. The Works of H. G. Wells. Vol. 19. New York: Scribner's, 1925.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G.The Shape of Things to Come. New York: Macmillan, 1933.Google Scholar
Wild, Jonathan. The Rise of the Office Clerk in Literary Culture, 1880–1939. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Key Words: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Rev. New York: Oxford UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Young, Arlene. Culture, Class, and Gender in the Victorian Novel: Gentlemen, Gents, and Working Women. New York: St. Martin's, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar