Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:14:30.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DEAD STILL AMONG US: VICTORIAN SECULAR RELICS, HAIR JEWELRY, AND DEATH CULTURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Deborah Lutz
Deborah Lutz*
Affiliation:
Long Island University, C.W. Post
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By the time the nineteenth century reached its close, it was already possible to look back at Victorian death culture with nostalgia. With the rise of secularism, the slide toward what Diana Fuss has called the death of death had begun. No longer was it common practice to hold onto the remains of the dead. Rarely would a lock of hair be kept by, to be worn as jewelry, nor did one dwell on the deathbed scene, linger upon the lips of the dying to mark and revere those last words, record the minutiae of slipping away in memorials, diaries, and letters. Rooms of houses were increasingly less likely to hold remains; no one had died in the beds in which the living slept. Walter Benjamin, who wrote often about what was lost in the nineteenth century, sees the turning away from death as going hand in hand with the disappearance of the art of storytelling. Writing in the early 1930s, he called his contemporaries “dry dwellers of eternity” because “today people live in rooms that have never been touched by death” (Illuminations 94). Avoiding the sight of the dying, Benjamin argues, one misses the moment when life becomes narrative, when the meaning of life is completed and illuminated in its ending. He privileges the shared moment of death, when relatives, and even the public, gather around the dying to glean final words of wisdom, to know perhaps, in the end, the whole story. Historian of death Philippe Ariès describes a Christian account of the final ordeal of the death bed, when in the moment of death the salvation or damnation of the dying is determined, thus changing or freezing, for good, the meaning of the whole life. Scholars of nineteenth- and twentieth-century death culture tend, on the whole, to agree that towards the end of the century, a process that began earlier reached a completion – that the death of the other not only became less of a shared experience among a community, but last things such as final words and remains were increasingly to be pushed to the back of consciousness and hence to the lumber room of meaning and importance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 127 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Ariès, Philippe. The Hour of our Death. New York: Knopf, 1981.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida. Trans. by Howard, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1981.Google Scholar
Bebbington, D. W.Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. New York: Schocken, 1968.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Little History of Photography.” Selected Writings: 1927–1943. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Braddon, M. E.The Lovels of Arden. New York: Harper, 1872.Google Scholar
Bronfen, Elisabeth. Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and The Aesthetic. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Brontë, Charlotte.Villette. New York: Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar
Brontë, Emily. Wuthering Heights. New York: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Broughton, Rhoda. Cometh Up As A Flower: An Autobiography. London: Richard Bentley and Son, 1878.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Cult of the Saints. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.Google Scholar
Bury, Shirley. An Introduction to Sentimental Jewellery. London: Owings Mills, 1985.Google Scholar
Bury, Shirley. Jewellery, 1789–1910: The International Era. Woodbridge: Antique Collector's Club, 1991.Google Scholar
Bury, Shirley. Cassell's Household Guide. London: Cassell, 1898.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. Hide and Seek. London: Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. No Name. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1893.Google Scholar
Cooper, Diana, and Norman, Battershill. Victorian Sentimental Jewellery. London: Newton Abbot, 1972.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Our Mutual Friend. New York: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Romola. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1902.Google Scholar
Evans, Joan. A History of Jewellery, 1100–1870. Boston: Boston Book and Art, 1970.Google Scholar
Evans, Joan. The Family Friend. London, 1853.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: Chicago UP, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Diana. “Corpse Poem.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2003): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitter, Elisabeth. “The Power of Women's Hair in the Victorian Imagination.” PMLA 99 (1984): 936–54.Google Scholar
Gordon, Beverly. “Women's Domestic Body.” Winterhur Portfolio 31.4 (1996).Google Scholar
Gorer, Geoffrey. Death, Grief, and Mourning. Garden City: Doubleday, 1965.Google Scholar
Hardy, Thomas. Wessex Poems and Other Verses. New York: Harper, 1899.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Frank. The English as Collectors: A Documentary Chrestomathy. New York: Norton, 1972.Google Scholar
Hibbert, Christopher. Queen Victoria. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Holm, Christian. “Sentimental Cuts: 18th–Century Mourning Jewelry with Hair.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 38 (2004): 139–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalland, Pat.Death in the Victorian Family. New York: Oxford UP, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Pamela. “Hair Jewelry as Fetish.” Objects of Special Devotion: Fetishes and Fetishism in Popular Culture. Ed. Browne, Ray B.. Bowling Green: Bowling Green UP, n.d.Google Scholar
Munn, Geoffrey. The Triumph of Love: Jewelry 1530–1930. London: Thames and Hudson, 1993.Google Scholar
Navarro, Irene Guggenheim. “Hairwork of the 19th Century.” Magazine Antiques 159 (2001): 484–93.Google Scholar
Navarro, Irene Guggenheim. Official Descriptive and Illustrated Catalogue of the Great Exhibition of 1851. London: Spicer Brothers, 1851.Google Scholar
Pascoe, Judith. The Hummingbird Cabinet: A Rare and Curious History of Romantic Collectors. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Pearce, Susan. On Collecting: An Investigation Into Collecting in the European Tradition. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Peltason, Timothy. Reading In Memoriam. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Pointon, Marcia. “Wearing Memory: Mourning, Jewellery and the Body.” Trauer Trager – Trauer Zeigen: Inszenierungen der Geschlecter. Ed. Ecker, Gisela. Munich: Fink, 1999.Google Scholar
Rossetti, Dante Gabriel. Collected Poetry and Prose. New Haven: Yale UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, Diana. “The Aberdeen Jewel.” Burlington Magazine 130 (1988): 427–28.Google Scholar
Scarisbrick, Diana. Ancestral Jewels. London: Deutsch, 1989.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. William Shakespeare: The Complete Sonnets and Poems. Ed. Burrow, Colin. New York: Oxford UP, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheumaker, Helen. Love Entwined: The Curious History of Hairwork in America. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sox, David. Relics and Shrines. London: Allen and Unwin, 1985.Google Scholar
Speight, Alexanna. The Lock of Hair. London: Goubaud and Son, 1872.Google Scholar
Stewart, Garrett. Death Sentences: Styles of Dying in British Fiction. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Stewart, Susan. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham: Duke UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lou. Mourning Dress: A Costume and Social History. London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred Lord. In Memoriam. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1904.Google Scholar
Thackeray, William Makepeace. The History of Henry Esmond. London: Macmillan, 1905.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael. Death and the Future Life in Victorian Literature and Theology. New York: Cambridge UP, 1990.Google Scholar