Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:05:27.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANIMATING HOUSEHOLD GODS: VALUE, TOTEMS, AND KINSHIP IN VICTORIAN ANTHROPOLOGY AND DICKENS'S DOMBEY AND SON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2014

Supritha Rajan
Supritha Rajan*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the heart of Dickens'sDombey and Son (1846–48) is a woman who is both the central problem that the narrative seeks to manage and its solution to that problem. Florence's position as heiress to Dombey and Son enables her entry into the marketplace as an independently wealthy woman who disrupts the patriarchal transmission of property and money. Dombey and Son diverts attention from Florence's position as heiress by providing a sentimental lesson on the economic importance of the domestic woman, who grounds intrinsic value and is essential to the reproduction of the patriarchal family and economy. Dombey's domestic and financial failures, the novel would have us believe, stem from his initial devaluation of Florence and overvaluation of Paul. Hence, at the novel's close, Dombey learns that the foundation of the family and firm is not a son but “a Daughter after all.” Dickens thus presents Florence's intrinsic value and inalienability as the resolution to the very problem of alienability and unstable values that her position as heiress encodes. Yet this lesson regarding Florence's value conceals the novel's central anxiety, what Robert Clark refers to as “the arbitrary taboo on women's participation in the economic order” (73). If the novel accords insubstitutable value to the domestic woman as the keystone of the family and economy, it does so to dramatize the threat posed to patriarchal structures of kinship, property, and capitalist expansion if all women were to enter the marketplace and become, in a sense, heiresses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 33 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Appadurai, Arjun. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Ed. Appadurai, Arjun. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 3–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Nina. Romantic Imprisonment: Women and Other Glorified Outcasts. New York: Columbia UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Bachofen, Johann Jakob. Das Mutterrecht. Eine Untersuchung über die Gynaikokratie der alten Welt nach ihrer religiösen und rechtlichen Natur. Basel: B. Schwabe, 1897.Google Scholar
Behlmer, George K. Friends of the Family: The English Home and Its Guardians. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. “The Origin of Totemism.” 1916. Race, Language, and Culture. New York: Macmillan, 1940. 316–23.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. Fictions of State: Culture and Credit in Britain, 1694–1994. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Asa. Victorian Things. Sutton History Classics. Rev. ed. Stroud: Sutton, 2003.Google Scholar
Brown, Bill. “The Secret Life of Things (Virginia Woolf and the Matter of Modernism).” Modernism/modernity 6.2 (1999): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bill. A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bill. “Thing Theory.” Things. Ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.Google Scholar
Buzard, James. Disorienting Fiction: The Autoethnographic Work of Nineteenth-Century British Novels. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Cain, Lynn. Dickens, Family, and Authorship: Psychoanalytical Perspectives on Kinship and Creativity. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Chase, Karen, and Levenson, Michael. The Spectacle of Intimacy: A Public Life for the Victorian Family. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert. “Riddling the Family Firm: The Sexual Economy in Dombey and Son.” ELH 51.1 (1984): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Deborah. Household Gods: The British and Their Possessions. New Haven: Yale UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Collins, Philip Arthur William. Dickens: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge 1971.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste. System of Positive Polity. 1851–1854. Vol. 4. New York: Burt Franklin, 1968.Google Scholar
Corbett, Mary Jean. Family Likeness. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, ed. Things That Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. Cambridge: MIT P, 2007.Google Scholar
Davidoff, Leonore. “Where the Stranger Begins: The Question of Siblings in Historical Analysis.” Worlds Between: Historical Perspectives on Gender and Class. New York: Routledge, 1995. 208–26.Google Scholar
Davidoff, Leonore, and Hall, Catherine. Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son. 1846–48. Ed. Peter Fairclough. London: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. Ed. Ford, George Harry and Monod, Sylvère. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Dickens, Mamie. My Father as I Recall Him. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1897.Google Scholar
Dolin, Tim. The Mistress of the House: Women of Property in the Victorian Novel. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. 1912. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, Andrew. “Managing the House in Dombey and Son: Dickens and the Uses of Analogy.” Studies in Philology 92.3 (1995): 361–82.Google Scholar
Ellison, David A. “Mobile Homes, Fallen Furniture, and the Dickens Cure.” South Atlantic Quarterly 108.1 (2009): 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan. Theories of Primitive Religion. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Google Scholar
Fee, Elizabeth. “The Sexual Politics of Victorian Social Anthropology.” Ed. Hartman, Mary S. and Banner, Lois. Clio's Consciousness Raised: New Perspectives in the History of Women. New York: Octagon, 1974. 86–102.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. 1890. New York: Macmillan, 1950.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George. “Taboo.” Encyclopaedia Britannica 23 (1878): 15–18.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George. Totemism and Exogamy. 1910. Vol. 1. London: Macmillan, 1935.Google Scholar
Freedgood, Elaine. The Ideas in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Totem and Taboo. New York: Routledge, Kegan & Paul, 1950.Google Scholar
Furneaux, Holly. “Charles Dickens's Families of Choice: Elective Affinities, Sibling Substitution, and Homoerotic Desire.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 62.2 (2007): 153–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Body Economic: Life, Death, and Sensation in Political Economy and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Reformation of English Fiction: Social Discourse and Narrative Form 1832–1867. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985.Google Scholar
Goldenweiser, A. A. “Totemism: An Analytical Study.” Journal of American Folklore. 23 (1910): 179–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Christopher. “Filthy Lucre: Victorian Ideas of Money.” Victorian Studies 44.2 (2002): 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Hornblower, and Spawforth, Anthony, eds. The Oxford Classical Dictionary 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Audrey. Vanishing Points: Dickens, Narrative, and the Subject of Omniscience. Berkeley: U of California P, 1991.Google Scholar
Jones, Robert Alun. The Secret of the Totem: Religion and Society from McLennan to Freud. New York: Columbia UP, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaver, Claudia. A/Moral Economies: Classical Political Economy and Cultural Authority in Nineteenth-Century England. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2003.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” The Social Life of Things. Ed. Appadurai, Arjun. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew. The Secret of the Totem. London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1905.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Rev. ed. Boston: Beacon, 1969.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Totemism. Trans. Needham, Rodney. Boston: Beacon, 1963.Google Scholar
Levy, Anita. Other Women: The Writing of Class, Race, and Gender, 1832–1898. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Logan, Peter Melville. Victorian Fetishism: Intellectuals and Primitives. Albany: SUNY P, 2009.Google Scholar
Logan, Thad. The Victorian Parlour. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. 1861. London: Oxford UP, 1959.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. The Early Writings of Bronislaw Malinowski. Ed. Thornton, Robert J. and Skalnik, Peter. Trans. Krzyzanowki, Ludwik. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Marcus, Sharon. Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Steven. Dickens, from Pickwick to Dombey. New York: Basic Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Markovits, Stefanie. “Form Things: Looking at Genre through Victorian Diamonds.” Victorian Studies 52.4 (2010): 591–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Joss Lutz. “Good Mrs. Brown's Connections: Sexuality and Story-Telling in Dealings with the Firm of Dombey and Son.” ELH 58 (1991): 405–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. Halls, W. D.. New York: W.W. Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
May, Leila Silvana. Disorderly Sisters: Sibling Relations and Sororal Resistance in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 2001.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
McLennan, John Ferguson. Primitive Marriage: An Inquiry into the Origin of the Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies. 1865. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, John Ferguson. “The Worship of Plants and Animals.” Fortnightly Review 4 (1869): 407–27, 562–82.Google Scholar
McLennan, John Ferguson. “The Worship of Plants and Animals.” Fortnightly Review 7 (1870): 194–216.Google Scholar
Michie, Elsie B. “Rich Woman, Poor Woman: Toward an Anthropology of the Nineteenth-Century Marriage Plot.” PMLA 124.2 (2009): 421–36.Google Scholar
Michie, Elsie B. The Vulgar Question of Money: Heiresses, Materialism, and the Novel of Manners from Jane Austen to Henry James. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, Helena. “From Blood to Law: The Embarrassments of Family in Dickens.”Palgrave Advances in Charles Dickens Studies. Ed. Bowen, John and Patten, Robert L.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. The Burdens of Perfection: On Ethics and Reading in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. Novels Behind Glass: Commodity Culture and Victorian Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moglen, Helene. “Theorizing Fiction/Fictionalizing Theory: The Case of Dombey and Son.” Victorian Studies 35 (1992): 159–84.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. Ancient Society, or, Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. Cleveland: World, 1967.Google Scholar
Moynahan, Julian. “Dealings with the Firm of Dombey and Son: Firmness Versus Wetness.” Dickens and the Twentieth Century. Ed. Gross, John. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1962. 121–31.Google Scholar
Nunokawa, Jeff. The Afterlife of Property: Domestic Security and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlando, Francesco. Obsolete Objects in the Literary Imagination. Trans. Pihas, Gabriel, Seidel, Daniel, and Grego, Alessandro. New Haven: Yale UP, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, Suvendrini. Reaches of Empire: The English Novel from Edgeworth to Dickens. New York: Columbia UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Perry, Ruth. Novel Relations: The Transformation of Kinship in English Literature and Culture, 1748–1818. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietz, William. “Fetishism and Materialism: The Limits of Theory in Marx.” Fetishism as Cultural Discourse. Ed. Apter, Emily and Pietz, William. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993. 119–51.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. Portable Property: Victorian Culture on the Move. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England. Women in Culture and Society. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psomiades, Kathy Alexis. “Heterosexual Exchange and Other Victorian Fictions: The Eustace Diamonds and Victorian Anthropology.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 33.1 (1999): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R.Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York: Free, 1952.Google Scholar
Richards, Thomas. The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Rives, James B. Religion in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” Toward an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Reiter, Rayna R.. New York: Monthly Review, 1975. 157–210.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. The Works of John Ruskin. Ed. Cook, Edward Tyas and Wedderburn, Alexander D. O.. Library ed. 39 vols. London: G. Allen, 1903.Google Scholar
Sadoff, Dianne F. Monsters of Affection: Dickens, Eliot, and Bronte on Fatherhood. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary Margo. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian Britain. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Smith, William Robertson. Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1885.Google Scholar
Spector, Stephen J. “Monsters of Metonymy: Hard Times and Knowing the Working Class.” ELH 51.2 (1984): 365–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter. “Marx's Coat.” Border Fetishisms: Material Objects in Unstable Spaces. Ed. Spyer, Patricia. New York: Routledge, 1998. 183–207.Google Scholar
Stewart, Susan. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Victorian Anthropology. New York: Free, 1987.Google Scholar
Surridge, Lisa. Bleak Houses: Marital Violence in Victorian Fiction. Athens: Ohio UP, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, James. Models of Value: Eighteenth-Century Political Economy and the Novel. Durham: Duke UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Toise, David. “As Good as Nowhere: Dickens's Dombey and Son, the Contingency of Value, and Theories of Domesticity.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 41.3 (1999): 323–48.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward Burnett. “Remarks on Totemism with Special Reference to Some Modern Theories Concerning It.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 28 (1898): 138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Cynthia Sundberg. The Prose of Things: Transformations of Description in the Eighteenth Century. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrior, Valerie M. Roman Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Catherine. Dickens and the Politics of the Family. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: U of California P, 1992.Google Scholar
Weiss, Barbara. The Hell of the English: Bankruptcy and the Victorian Novel. Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1986.Google Scholar
Welsh, Alexander. The City of Dickens. Oxford: Clarendon, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermarck, Edward. The History of Human Marriage. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. “Introduction.” Dombey and Son. Ed. Fairclough, Peter. London: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Sybil. In-Laws and Outlaws: Kinship and Marriage in England. London: Croom and Helm, 1987.Google Scholar
Yelin, Louise. “Strategies for Survival: Florence and Edith in Dombey and Son.” Victorian Studies 22 (1979): 297–319.Google Scholar
Zwinger, Lynda. Daughters, Fathers, and the Novel: the Sentimental Romance of Heterosexuality. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1991.Google Scholar