Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:29:09.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking the Debates on the Poor Law in Early Nineteenth-Century England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

David Eastwood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the more interesting developments in recent historical writing has been a reconsideration of the debates over poor law reform. In the sharply-demarcated world of post-war scholarship, the poor law fell clearly, if somewhat problematically, into the domain of social history. For obvious contemporary reasons, post-war social history devoted a good deal of scholarly energy to constructing a history of social policy. Much of this work was problematized in terms of the then orthodox agenda of the welfare state. The dominant questions concerned modes of assessing entitlements, mechanisms for delivering welfare, and the bureaucratic characteristics of the old and new poor laws. Despite its considerable empirical merits, this kind of social history was inhibited by its methodological and problematic certainties. To a large extent this was a social history which defined itself against traditional political history, offering a narrative of social policy formation which, whilst not eliminating political processes from its account, tended to marginalize their normative significance. One extreme formulation was Sydney Checkland's ‘socially innocent state’. Here the loss of ‘social innocence’ on the part of the British state is evaluated directly in terms of its willingness to develop the kind of social agenda and administrative machinery characteristic of modern wellfarism. For Checkland in particular, social policy was conceived almost exclusively in terms of state-driven programmes of ‘social improvement’. The old poor law, with its pattern of local management, discretionary administration, and paternalist social vision flatly contracted the statutorily-articulated welfarism which Checkland took to be axiomatic to a coherently-conceived social policy. In terms of statutory authority and administrative machinery, Checkland saw the new poor law as a critical move towards a more coherently-constructed state social policy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , May 1994 , pp. 97 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wood, Peter's recent survey, Poverty and the Workhouse in Victorian Britain, Stroud, 1991Google Scholar, offers a valuable, if unconscious, summary of this tradition. See also Henriques, U. R. Q., Before the Welfare State. Social administration in early industrial Britain, London, 1979Google Scholar; Roberts, David, The Victorian Origins of the British Welfare State, New Haven, 1960Google Scholar; Fraser, Derek, The Evolution of the British Welfare State, London, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Midwinter, E. C., Social Administration in Lancashire 1830–1860, Manchester, 1969Google Scholar; Thane, P., The Foundations of the Welfare State, London, 1982.Google Scholar

2 Checkland, Sydney, British Public Policy 1776–1939, Cambridge, 1983, here at p. 83 but see also pp. 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 In Checkland's view the old poor law ‘was not a system, but an accretion’, ibid., p. 89, cf. pp. 84–6.

4 A number of the more important contributions to this debate were collected in Stansky, Peter, The Victorian Revolution. Government and Society in Victoria's Britain, New York, 1973Google Scholar. See also Hart, Jenifer, ‘Nineteenth-Century Social History: A Tory Interpretation of History’, Past and Present, xxxi (1965), 39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth-Century Government, ed. Sutherland, Gillian, London, 1972.Google Scholar

5 MacDonagh, Oliver, Early Victorian Government 1830–1870, London, 1977, p. 6, my italics.Google Scholar

6 Roberts, David, ‘Jeremy Bentham and the Victorian Administrative State’, Victorian Studies, ii (1959), 193–210, here at 201; my italics.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., 209.

8 MacDonagh, , pp. 1–21Google Scholar; Parris, Henry, Constitutional Bureaucracy: The Development of British Central Government since the Eighteenth Century, London, 1969Google Scholar; Chester, D. N., The English Administrative System 1780–1870, Oxford, 1981.Google Scholar

9 Russell, to Chadwick, , 9 10 1836Google Scholar, quoted in Lewis, R. A., Edwin Chadwick and the Public Health Movement 1832–1854, London, 1952, p. 321.Google Scholar

10 Ignatieff, Michael, A Just Measure of Pain. The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850, London, 1978Google Scholar; Scull, Andrew, Museums of Madness; the social organization of insanity in nineteenth-century England, London, 1979Google Scholar; ed. Cohen, Stanley and Scull, Andrew, Social Control and the State: Historical and Comparative Essays, Oxford, 1985Google Scholar; Porter, Roy, Mind-Forg'd Manacles. A History of Madness in England from the Restoration to the Regency, London, 1987.Google Scholar

11 Williams, Karel, From Pauperism to Poverty, London, 1981, pp. 140–4Google Scholar. If I read him correctly, Williams' objection to Foucault rests on what he takes to be Foucault's privileging of institutions over texts.

12 Driver, Felix, ‘Moral geographies: social science and the urban environment in mid-nineteenth century England’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, xiii (1988), 275–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘The historical geography of the workhouse system, 1834–1883’, Journal of Historical Geography, xv (1989), 269–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Power and pauperism. The workhouse system 1834–1884, Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar

13 Driver, , Power and Pauperism, p. 165.Google Scholar

14 Fraser, Derek, ‘The poor law as a political institution’, The New Poor Law in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Fraser, D., London, 1976, pp. 111–27, here at p. 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Urban Politics in Victorian England. The structure of politics in Victorian cities, Leicester, 1976, pp. 55–90.Google Scholar

15 Lubenow, William, The Politics of Government Growth. Early Victorian attitudes towards state intervention 1833–1848, Newton Abbot, 1971, p. 188, cf pp. 10–11Google Scholar; Dicey, A. V., Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century, 2nd. edn., London, 1948, pp. 126–258.Google Scholar

16 Brundage, Anthony, The Making of the New Poor Law. The politics of inquiry, enactment and implementation, 1832–39, London, 1978, p. ix.Google Scholar

17 Brundage, , Making of the New Poor Law, pp. 105–44, 181–6Google Scholar; ‘The English Poor Law of 1834 and the Cohesion of Agricultural Society’, Agricultural History, xlviii (1974), 405–17Google Scholar; ‘The Landed Interest and the New Poor Law; a Reappraisal of the Revolution in Government’, English Historical Review, lxxxvii (1972), 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moore, D. C., The Politics of Deference. A study of the mid-nineteenth-century English Political System, Hassocks, 1976.Google Scholar

18 Apfel, William and Dunkley, Peter, ‘English Rural Society and the New Poor Law: Bedfordshire 1834–47’, Social History, x (1985), 37–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dunkley, Peter, ‘Landed Interest and the New Poor Law: A Critical Note’, English Historical Review, lxxxviii (1973), 836–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘“The Hungry Forties” and the New Poor Law: a Case Study’, Historical Journal, xvii (1974), 329–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Paternalism, the Magistracy, and Poor Relief in England, 1795–1834’, International Review of Social History, xxii (1979), 371–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harling, Philip, ‘The Power of Persuasion. Central Authority, Local Bureaucracy and the New Poor Law’, English Historical Review, cvii (1992), 30–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eastwood, David: ‘Debate: The Making of the New Poor Law Redivivus’, Past and Present, cxxvii (1990), 184–94.Google Scholar

19 Mandler, Peter, Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform. Whigs and Liberals 1830–1852, Oxford, 1990, here at p. 131 but see pp. 131–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and ‘The Making of the New Poor Law Redivivus’, Past and Present, cxvii (1987), 131–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Tories and Paupers: Christian Political Economy and The Making of the new Poor Law’, Historical Journal, xxiii (1990), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Marshall, John, ‘The Nottinghamshire Reformers and their Contribution to the New Poor’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, xiii (1961), 382–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Cowherd, R. F., The Political Economists and the English Poor Laws, Ohio, 1977.Google Scholar

22 Mandler, Peter, ‘Debate: The Making of the New Poor Law Redivivus’, Past and Present, cxxvii (1990), 194–201, here at 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Page, Frederick, The Principle of the English Poor Law Illustrated and Defended, London and Bath, 1822, pp. 80–102.Google Scholar

24 Innes, Joanna, ‘Parliament and the Shaping of Eighteenth-Century English Social Policy’, Transaction of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, xl (1990), 63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Poverty and Marginality in Eighteenth-Century England’, unpublished paper, 1985.Google Scholar

25 Gilbert, Thomas, A Scheme for the Better Relief and Employment of the Poor …, London, 1764Google Scholar; Plan for the Better Relief of the Poor, London, 1781Google Scholar; Heads of a Bill for the Better Relief and Employment of the Poor, Manchester, 1786Google Scholar; Considerations on the Bills for the Better Relief and Employment of the Poor, London, 1787Google Scholar; Objections to Mr Gilbert's Plan … Stated and Answered, London, 1787Google Scholar. See also , S. & Webb, B., English Poor Law History Part I: The Old Poor Law, London, 1927, pp. 149–313Google Scholar; Oxley, G., Poor Relief in England, 1601–1834, Newton Abbot, 1974Google Scholar; Slack, Paul, The English Poor Law 1531–1782, London, 1991, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar

26 Eastwood, David, Governing Rural England. Tradition and Transformation in Local Government 1780–1840, Oxford, 1994, pp. 99–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neuman, Mark, ‘A Suggestion Regarding the Origins of the Speenhamland Plan’, English Historical Review, lxxxiv (1969), 317–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The Speenhamland County, Poverty and the Poor Laws in Berkshire 1782–1834, New York, 1982.Google Scholar

27 Eastwood, , Governing Rural England, pp. 166–80Google Scholar; Boyer, George R., An Economic History of the English Poor Law, 1750–1850. Cambridge, 1990, pp. 94–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Oxf[ordshire] C[ounty] R[ecord] O[ffice], MSS D. D. Par Finmere e.1, Finmere Vestry Minutes, fos. 144–6, 149–57.

29 Eastwood, David, ‘The Republic in the Village: Parish and Poor in Bampton 1780–1834’, Journal of Regional and Local Studies, xii (1992), 18–28.Google Scholar

30 Ricardo, David, Principles of Political Economy, ed. Sraffa, P., Cambridge, 1951, p. 107.Google Scholar

31 For the Malthusian position see, Malthus, T. R., An Essay on the Principle of Population [1798 edn.], ed. and intro. Flew, A., Harmondsworth, 1970, pp. 97–103Google Scholar; An Essay on the Principle of Population [1803 edn.], ed. and intro. Hollingsworth, T. H., 2 vols., London, 1973, ii. 35–69Google Scholar; Letter to Samuel Whitbread, Esq., on the Subject of the Poor Laws, London, 1807Google Scholar; Petersen, William, Malthus, London, 1979, pp. 100–34Google Scholar; Digby, Anne, ‘Malthus and the Reform of the English Poor Law’, in Malthus and his Time, ed. Turner, M., London, 1986, pp. 157–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Poynter, J. R., Society and Pauperism. English Ideas on Poor Relief, 1795–1834, London, 1969, pp. 144–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Report from the Select Committee on the Laws, Poor, P[arliamentary] P[apers], 1817, (462) vi.Google Scholar

34 Abstract of the Poor [1813–1815], P.P., 1818, (82) xixGoogle Scholar; Report from the Select Committee on the Poor Laws, P.P., 1816, (485) iv.Google Scholar

35 Report from the Select Committee on the Poor Laws, P.P., 1817, (462) vi, 3–29Google Scholar; Poynter, , pp. 245–8.Google Scholar

36 58 Geo. III, C.69; 59 Geo. III, c. 12; 59 Geo. III, c.8; Eastwood, , Governing Rural England, pp. 128–32.Google Scholar

37 Boyer, , pp. 13, 85–121.Google Scholar

38 Hampshire C. R. O., Sturges Bourne-Dyson Correspondence, 9M55/F11/6, Bourne, Anne Sturges to Dyson, Marianne, 7 02 1833Google Scholar; 9M55/F12/10, Bourne, Anne Sturges to Dyson, Marianne, 5 05 1834Google Scholar; Brundage, , Making of the New Poor Law, pp. 20–1, 30, 42–3, 57–8.Google Scholar

39 Parliamentary Debates, new series, v (1821), 577–8.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., 572–83, 987–94, 1228–30.

41 Prentice, Archibald, Historical Sketches and Personal Recollections of Manchester. Intended to Illustrate the Progress of Public Opinion from 1792 to 1832, 2nd edn., London, 1851, p. 213.Google Scholar

42 Parliamentary Debates, new series, v (1821), 994.Google Scholar

43 Parliamentary Debates, new series, v (1821), 574–5, 991.Google Scholar

44 Parliamentary Debates, new series, v (1821), 583.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., 585.

46 Report from the Select Committee on Poor Rate Returns, P.P., 1822 (556) v. 537.Google Scholar

47 Report from the Select Committee of the House of Lords on the Poor Laws, P.P., 1831, (227) viiiGoogle Scholar; Hobsbawm, E. J. and Rudé, George, Captain Swing, Harmondsworth, 1973, pp. 18–33, 52–3.Google Scholar

48 Report from the Select Committee on Relief of Abie-Bodied Persons, P.P., 1828, (494) iv.Google Scholar

49 Parliamentary Debates, xxxv (1817), 522–9.Google Scholar

50 4 and 5 William IV, c. 76; Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, xxii (1834), 875–6, xxiii (1834), 952–1003.Google Scholar

51 Eastwood, David, ‘“Amplifying the Province of the Legislature”. The Flow of Information and the English State in the Early Nineteenth Century’, Historical Research, lxii (1989), 285–8Google Scholar; Report from the Select Committee on the Poor Laws, P.P., 1816, (485) ivGoogle Scholar; Abstract of the Poor [1813–1815], P.P., 1818, (82) xix.Google Scholar

52 The Poor Law Report of 1834, ed., , S. G. and Checkland, E. O. A., Harmondsworth, 1974, pp. 128–30Google Scholar and passim Blaug, Mark, ‘The Myth of the Old Poor Law and the Making of the New’, reprinted in Essays in Social History, ed. Flinn, M. W. and Smout, T. C., Oxford, 1974, pp. 123–53Google Scholar; ‘The Poor Law Report Re-examined’, Journal of Economic History, xxiv (1964), 229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Cullen, Michael J., The Statistical Movement in Early Victorian Britain. The Foundations of Empirical Social Research, Hassocks, 1975Google Scholar; Eastwood, , ‘“Amplifying the Province of the Legislature”’.Google Scholar

54 The Speeches of the Rt. Hon. William Pitt, 3 vols., London, 1808, ii. 129–37, quotation at p. 137.Google Scholar

55 Oxf. C.R.O., Quarter Sessions Records 1782–1800, QSM II/2, Epiphany 1795; Buckinghamshire C.R.O., Quarter Sessions Minute Book, 1792–6, Q/SM/10, fo. 232; Wells, Roger, Wretched Faces, Famine in Wartime England 1793–1801, Gloucester, 1988, pp. 288–314Google Scholar; Snell, K. D. M., Annals of the Labouring Poor. Social Change and Agrarian England 1660–1900, Cambridge, 1985, pp. 104–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eastwood, , Governing Rural England, pp. 112–21.Google Scholar

56 Abstract of the Poor, P.P., 1803–1804, xiii (175).Google Scholar

57 Lowe, Joseph, The Present State of England in Regard to Agriculture, Trade, and Finance, 2nd edn., London, 1823, p. 187.Google Scholar

58 Report from the Select Committee on Labourers' Wages, , P.P., 1824, (392) vi, 402–64Google Scholar; Abstract of Returns from the Select Committee on Labourers' Wages, , P.P., 1825, xix. 363–419Google Scholar; Report from the Select Committee of Relief of Abie-Bodied Persons, P.P., 1828, (494) iv. 137–77.Google Scholar

59 Carlyle, Thomas, Chartism [1839]Google Scholar, reprinted in Carlyle, Thomas Sartor Resartus; Lectures on Heroes; Chartism; Past and Present, London, 1884, p. 8.Google Scholar

60 Bodkin, W. H., Brief Observations on the Bill to Amend the Poor Laws, London, 1821.Google Scholar

61 Abstracts of Returns on Poor Relief., P.P., 1830–1831, (52) xi. 208–9Google Scholar; (219) xi. 202–3; P.P., 1831–1832, (216) xliv. 450–1Google Scholar; P.P., 1833, (32) xxii. 349–50.Google Scholar

62 Poor Law Report of 1834, p. 191Google Scholar. Rates were levied against occupation rather than ownership.

63 Harling, , ‘Power of Persuasion’Google Scholar, carefully calibrates the degree of effective central control after 1834. See also Apfel, and Dunkley, , ‘English Rural Society and the New Poor Law’.Google Scholar

64 Bentham, Jeremy, ‘Principles of the Civil Code’, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John, 11 vols., Edinburgh, 1838–1843, i. 314.Google Scholar

65 Ibid., 314–16, 544. Cf. Malthus, , Essay in the Principle of Population [1803 edn.], ii. 35–69Google Scholar; Himmelfarb, G., The Idea of Poverty, London, 1984, pp. 100–76Google Scholar; Wrigley, E. A., ‘Malthus and the Prospects for the Labouring Poor’, Historical Journal, xxxi (1988), 813–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

66 Bentham, Jeremy, ‘Outline of a Work Entitled Pauper Management Improved’, Bowring, viii. 369.Google Scholar

67 As was well argued by Thomas Mackay in his supplement to Sir George Nicholls's classic History of the Poor Law. See SirNicholls, George and Mackay, Thomas, A History of the English Poor Law rev. edn., 3 vols., London, 1900, iii. 36–51Google Scholar. See also Finer, S. E., The Life and Times of Sir Edwin Chadwick, London, 1952, pp. 72–5.Google Scholar

68 Brundage, , Making of the New Poor Law, p. 182Google Scholar; England's “Prussian Minister”. Edwin. Chadwick and the Politics of Government Growth, 1832–1854, Philadelphia and London, 1988, pp. 1–11, 35–55.Google Scholar

69 Poor Law Report of 1834, pp. 334–53.Google Scholar

70 Hume, L. J., Bentham and Bureaucracy, Cambridge, 1981, pp. 130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

71 Bentham, , ‘Pauper Management Improved’, Bowring, viii. 371.Google Scholar