Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T19:26:50.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moral Conflict and Political Commitment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Williams, B., Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, London, 1985Google Scholar, esp. Chs. 4–6.

2 Lukes, S., Moral Conflict and Politics, Oxford, 1991Google Scholar. All page references in the text are to this volume.

3 Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Oxford, 1971, p. 29.Google Scholar

4 See Feyerabend, P. K., Against Method, London, 1975Google Scholar, Ch. 16.

5 Lukes, S., Power: A Radical View, London, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Stocker, M., Plural and Conflicting Values, Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar

7 See Nussbaum, M., The Fragility of Goodness, Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar

8 MacIntyre, A., After Virtue, London, 1981Google Scholar, and Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, London, 1988.Google Scholar

9 Lukes, S., Marxism and Morality, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar

10 This is not to deny the worth of such scholarly interpretation of Marx as of any other thinker. However, just as Marxists are anxious to judge capitalism by its historical record rather than as a theoretical ideal, so too should Marxism be judged.