Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T16:43:50.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

M. H. Laine  and
P. J. Kelly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Utilitas , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , November 1990 , pp. 345 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1984 Eco, U., ‘Signification and Denotation from Boethius to Ockham’, Fransciscan Studies, xliv (1984), 1–29.Google Scholar
1986 Gray, J. N., Liberalism, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
1986 Norris, P., ‘John Stuart Mill versus Bigotry, Bribery and Beer’, Corruption and Reform, i (1986), 79–100.Google Scholar
1987 Gates, B. T., ‘Not Choosing to Be: Victorian Literary Responses to Suicide’, Literature and Medicine, vi (1987), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987 Kilmarnock, A. ed., The Radical Change: The Responses to Social Democracy, London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
1987 Man-Ling Yu, R., George Eliot and John Stuart Mill: Liberal Positivism and the Handling of Determinism, Liverpool University Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1987 Morris, H. A., The Influence of the Mill-Carlyle ‘West Indian Debate’ on Four Victorian Novelists, Harvard University Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1987 Pazuhkin, R., ‘Proper Names: A Dispute of Misconceptions’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, xx (1987), 33–45.Google Scholar
1987 Pickett, T. H., ‘Four Letters of John Stuart Mill to Sarah Austin’, Victorian Institute Journal, xv (1987), 135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987 Ryan, A., ‘John Stuart Mill (1806–73)’, in Miller, D., Coleman, J., Connolly, W. and Ryan, A. eds., The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 339–42.Google Scholar
1987 Wingerd, K. L., New Voices in Victorian Criticism: Five Unrecognized Contributions to Victorian Periodicals, Kent State University Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1988 Bretz, M. L., ‘Emilia Pardo Bazan on John Stuart Mill: Towards a Redefinition of the Essay’, Hispanic Journal, ix (1988), 81–8.Google Scholar
1988 Flew, A., ‘A Laudable Libertarian's Lamentable Legacy: The Most Unfortunate Passage in J. S. Mill’, Quadrant, xxxii (1988), 94–7.Google Scholar
1988 Fredeman, W. and Nadel, I. B., ‘The (John Stuart) Mill-enium: A Note on the Frontispiece’, Journal of Pre-Raphaelite and Aesthetic Studies, i (1988), 113–15.Google Scholar
1988 Gherity, J. A., ‘Mill's “Friendly Critic”—Thornton or Whewell’, The Manchester School, lxi (1988), 282–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Glauberman, M., ‘Interpreting Bradley: The Critique of Fact-Pluralism’, History and Philosophy of Logic, ix (1988), 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Hamburger, J., ‘Three New Mill Letters to Sarah Austin’, The Mill News Letter, xxiii (1988), 14–21.Google Scholar
1988 Jeffers, T., ‘Forms of Misprison: The Early and Mid-Victorian Reception of Goethe's Bilungsidee’, University of Toronto Quarterly, lvii (1988), 501–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Kitromilides, P. M., ‘European Political Thought in the making of Greek Liberalism: The Second National Assembly of 1862–1864 and the Reception of John Stuart Mill's Ideas in Greece’, Parliaments, Estates and Representation, viii (1988), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Miles, D., Francis Place, 1771–1854: The Life of a Respectable Radical, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
1988 Nord, D. E., ‘Mill and Ruskin on the Woman Question Revisited’, in Perkins, D. ed., Teaching Literature: What is Needed Now, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
1988 Peltason, T., ‘Immigration and Learning in George Eliot, Mill and Dickens’, Essays in Criticism, xxxviii (1988), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Radford, C., ‘Utilitarianism and the Noble Art’, Philosophy, lxvii (1988), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988 Robson, A. P., ‘John Stuart Mill and the Mighty Atom’, The Mill News Letter, xxiii (1988), 3–13.Google Scholar
1988 Scarce, G., Logic and Reality in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
1989 Ashcraft, R., ‘Class Conflict and Constitutionalism in J. S. Mill's Thought’, in Rosenblum, N. L. ed., Liberalism and the Moral Life, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 105–26.Google Scholar
1989 Bradley, M. E., ‘J. S. Mill's Demand Curves’, History of Political Economy, xxi (1989), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Carlisle, J., ‘J. S. Mill's Autobiography: The Life of a Bookish Man’, Victorian Studies, xxxiii (1989), 125–48.Google Scholar
1989 Carter, A., The Philosophical Foundations of Property Rights, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
1989 Creedy, J., ‘Whewell's “Translation” of J. S. Mill’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, xxxvii (1989), 266–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Crosson, F. J., ‘Mill's Dilemmas’, Interpretation, xvi (1989), 229–45.Google Scholar
1989 Evans, M., ‘John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx: Some Problems and Perspectives’, History of Political Economy, xxi (1989), 273–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Forget, E. L., ‘J. S. Mill and J. F. Cairnes on Natural Value: The Role of Expectations in Late Classical Thought’, History of Political Economy, xxi (1989), 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Gray, J. N., Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1989 Henderson, J. P., ‘Whewell's Solution to the reciprocal Demand Riddle in Mill's “Great Chapter”’, History of Political Economy, xxi (1989), 661–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Kurer, O., ‘John Stuart Mill On Government Intervention’, History of Political Thought, x (1989), 457–80.Google Scholar
1989 Levine, P., Victorian Feminism 1850–1900, Tallahassee: Florida State University Press.Google Scholar
1989 Lewis, D., ‘Mill and Milquetoast’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, lxvii (1989), 152–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 McKercher, W. R., Freedom and Authority, Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
1989 McKercher, W. R., ‘John Stuart Mill and Liberty: A Libertarian Critique’, in Roussopoulos, D. I. ed., The Anarchist Papers 2, Montreal: Black Rose Books, pp. 51–106.Google Scholar
1989 Mendus, S. L., Toleration and the Limits of Liberty, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Mill, J. S., Miscellaneous Writings, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto: University of Toronto Press (The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xxxi).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Mill, J. S., On Liberty and other Writings, ed. Collini, Stefan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1989 Peart, S. J., The Applied Economics of William Stanley Jevons Including Some Comparisons With John Stuart Mill, University of Toronto Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
1989 Reed, J. R., Victorian Will, Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
1989 Robson, J. M., ‘Thirty Years with the Right Project: The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, series v, vol. iv (1989), 228–37.Google Scholar
1989 Scharff, R. C., ‘Mill's Misreading of Comte on “Interior Observation”’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, xxvii (1989), 559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Scharff, R. C., ‘Positivism, Philosophy of Science, and Self-Understanding in Comte and Mill’, American Philosophical Quarterly, xxvi (1989), 253–68.Google Scholar
1989 Skorupski, J., John Stuart Mill, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1989 Strasser, M., ‘Actual Versus Probable Utilitarianism’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, xxvii (1989), 585–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989)Google Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989) Eisenach, E. J., ‘Self-Reform as Political Reform in the Writings of John Stuart Mill’, 242–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989) Green, M., ‘Sympathy and Self-Interest: The Crisis in Mill's Mental History’, 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Utilitas, i (1989) Kurer, O., ‘John Stuart Mill on Democratic Representation and Centralization’, 290–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Vernon, R., ‘J. S. Mill and the Religion of Humanity’, in Crimmins, J. E. ed., Religion, Secularization and Political Thought, London: Routledge, 90–110.Google Scholar
1990 Carlson, G. C., ‘Pain and the Quantum Leap to Agent-Neutral Value’, Ethics, c (1990), 363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 Cowling, M., Mill and Liberalism, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 Gibbins, J., ‘J. S. Mill, Liberalism and Progress’, in Bellamy, R. ed., Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
1990 Kerner, G. C., Three Philosophical Moralists: Mill, Kant, and Sartre: An Introduction to Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1990 Lasky, M. J., ‘John Stuart Mill's Prediction (1852)’, Encounter, lxxiv (1990), 5.Google Scholar
1990 Mill, J. S., ‘The Limits to Power’, and ‘Duties to Animals are Direct’, in Clarke, P. A. B. and Linzey, A. eds., Political Theory and Animal Rights, London: Pluto Press, pp. 84–6, 138–40.Google Scholar
1990 Riley, J., ‘Utilitarian Ethics and Democratic Government’, Ethics, c (1990), 335–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 Utilitas, ii (1990)Google Scholar
1990 Utilitas, ii (1990) Long, D. G., ‘“Utility” and the “Utility Principle”: Hume, Smith, Bentham, Mill’, 12–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 Utilitas, ii (1990) Robson, A., ‘No Laughing Matter: John Stuart Mill's Establishment of Woman's Suffrage as a Parliamentary Question’, 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 Utilitas, ii (1990) Robson, J. M., ‘Mill in Parliament: The View from the Comic Papers’, 102–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar