Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:19:57.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epicurus as a Forerunner of Utilitarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Extract

How original was the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham? In John Stuart Mill's opinion, not very original at all. Bentham maintained that pleasure and pain should provide our chief criteria of the moral quality of actions, because they are important above all other things in making our lives go well or ill. But two thousand years before Bentham defended the doctrine of utility that ‘all things are good or evil, by virtue solely of the pain or pleasure which they produce”, a gentle and cultivated man had taught in a garden at Athens that the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain were the most fitting objectives in the life of the wise man. The name of this sage, who endeavoured to provide in his own career an exemplar of his doctrine, was Epicurus of Samos. On Mill's reading of history, utilitarianism and Epicureanism were in essential respects the same.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mill, John Stuart, ‘The Protagoras” in Essays on Philosophy and the Classics, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1978Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, xi. 61Google Scholar; cf. Autobiography, in Autobiography and Literary Essays, ed. Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack, Toronto, 1981Google Scholar, CW, i. 49Google Scholar; Utilitarianism in Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1970Google Scholar, CW, x. ch. 2.Google Scholar

2 Epicurus: The Extant Remains, ed. Bailey, Cyril, Oxford, 1926Google Scholar, Fragment XXI. All subsequent references to Epicurus's writings will be to this edition, and the following abbreviations will be used: LM Letter to Menoeceus; PD Principal Doctrines; FR Fragments (note: Fragments with Roman numerals are from the Vatican collection); DL Life of Epicurus by Diogenes Laertius.

3 LM, p. 87.Google Scholar

4 LM, p. 91.Google Scholar

5 Causaubon, Meric, Of Credulity and Incredulity, London, 1668, pp. 213, 216.Google Scholar

6 DL, p. 145.Google Scholar

7 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 210.Google Scholar

8 DL, p. 147.Google Scholar

9 Cicero, , De Finibus Bononim et Malorum, ed. and trans. Rackham, H., London, 1967, p. 59.Google Scholar

10 IM, p. 87.Google Scholar

11 PD, VIII.Google Scholar

12 PD, XV.Google Scholar

13 LM, p. 87Google Scholar

14 FR, LIGoogle Scholar (cf. FR, 8).Google Scholar

15 FR, 69, 70.Google Scholar

16 LM, p. 8991.Google Scholar

17 DL, p. 165.Google Scholar

18 FR, 59.Google Scholar

19 DL, p. 165.Google Scholar

20 Aristotle, for example at Nicomachean Ethics 1173a.Google Scholar

21 Cicero, , De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, Bk. II.Google Scholar

22 DL, p. 169.Google Scholar

23 DeWitt, N. W., Epicurus arid His Philosophy, Minneapolis, 1954, p. 243.Google Scholar

24 LM, p. 89.Google Scholar

25 LM, p. 87.Google Scholar

26 FR, LI.Google Scholar

27 LM, p. 91.Google Scholar

29 FR, 23.Google Scholar

30 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 210.Google Scholar

31 Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A., London, 1970, p. 40.Google Scholar

32 IM, p. 89.Google Scholar

33 Ibid.; Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 211.Google Scholar

34 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 212Google Scholar; LM, p. 89.Google Scholar

35 DL, p. 147.Google Scholar

36 PD, XXVIIGoogle Scholar; FR, LII.Google Scholar

37 PD, XL.Google Scholar

38 FR, XXIII.Google Scholar

39 Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, Bk. IX.Google Scholar

40 Cicero, , De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum, Bk. II.Google Scholar

41 Mill, , Utilitarianism, CW, x. 218.Google Scholar