Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T06:31:52.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broome's Argument against Value Incomparability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2004

ERIK CARLSON
ERIK CARLSON
Affiliation:
Uppsala University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Broome has argued that alleged cases of value incomparability are really examples of vagueness in the betterness relation. The main premiss of his argument is ‘the collapsing principle’. I argue that this principle is dubious, and that Broome's argument is therefore unconvincing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , July 2004 , pp. 220 - 224
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)