Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:50:08.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unknowable Obligations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2009

Roy Sorensen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

You face two buttons. Pushing one will destroy Greensboro. Pushing the other will save it. (Sorry, doing nothing also destroys Greenboro.) There is no way for you to know which button saves and which destroys. What ought you to do? Answer: You ought to make the correct guess and push the button that saves Greensboro. Second question: Do you have an obligation to push the correct button?

Type
Research Article
Information
Utilitas , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , November 1995 , pp. 247 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Ted Sider has graciously permitted me to become a moving target. I have revised in response to his initial reply and he has revised in response to this revision. I am also grateful to Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Sigrun Svavarsdottir for detailed criticisms and tips.

References

1 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass., 1971, p. 133.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 302.

3 Williams, Bernard, ‘Moral Luck’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supple mentary Volume, 1 (1976), 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn., London, 1907, bk. 4, ch. 5, §§ 2 and 3.Google Scholar

5 Piper, Adrian M. S., ‘Utility, Publicity, and Manipulation’, Ethics, lxxxviii (1978), 189–206.Google Scholar

6 Baier, Kurt, The Moral Point of View, Ithaca, 1958, p. 196.Google Scholar

7 Williams, Bernard and Smart, J. J. C., Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge, 1973, p. 135.Google Scholar

8 Slote, Michael, ‘Morality and Ignorance’, Journal of Philosophy, lxxiv (1977), 745–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 For a similar argument, see Schellenberg, J. L., Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason, Ithaca, 1993.Google Scholar

10 Sorensen, Roy, ‘Moral Dilemmas, Thought Experiments, and Conflict Vagueness’, Philosophical Studies, lxiii (1991), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Chisholm, Roderick, ‘The Problem of the Speckled Hen’, Mind, li (1942), 368–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Further illustrations are provided in Sorensen, , ‘Vagueness Implies Cognitivism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, xxvii (1990), 1–14.Google Scholar

13 Prichard, H. A., Moral Obligation, Oxford, 1949, pp. 31–9.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., pp. 18–39.

15 Kant, Immanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, [1785], trans. Beck, Lewis White, ed. Wolf, Robert Paid New York, 1969, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

16 Kavka, Gregory, ‘The Toxin Puzzle’, Analysis, xliii (1983), 33–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Kant, , Metaphysics of Morals, p. 17.Google Scholar

18 Mele, Alfred R., ‘Intentions, Reasons, and Beliefs’, Philosophical Studies, lxviii (1992), 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Davidson, Donald, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, 1980, p. 264Google Scholar, and Goldman, Alvin, A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, 1970, p. 76.Google Scholar

20 Gauthier, David, ‘Assure and Threaten’, Ethics, civ (1994), 708.Google Scholar

21 Kavka, , 35.Google Scholar

22 Ibid.

23 Davidson, , p. 79.Google Scholar

24 Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, trans. Beck, Lewis White, Chicago, 1949, p. 247.Google Scholar

25 Kant, , Metaphysics of Morals, p. 27.Google Scholar

26 Ross, Lee and Nisbett, Richard, The Person and the Situation, Philadelphia, 1991.Google Scholar

27 Buss, David, The Evolution of Desire, New York, 1994, pp. 146–7.Google Scholar

28 Leigh, Egbert, ‘How does selection reconcile individual advantage with the good of the group?’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, lxxiv (1977), 4542–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Cummins, Robert, ‘Programs in the Explanation of Behavior’, Scientific Knowledge, ed. Kourany, Janet, Belmont, California, 1987.Google Scholar

30 Driver, Julia, ‘The Virtues of Ignorance’, Journal of Philosophy, lxxvi (1989), 373–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar