Article contents
James Mill on Peace and War*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2009
Extract
James Mill's views on peace and war have yet to be examined in detail. Only a few scholars have paid any attention to this aspect of his thought. Edmund Silberner was the first to give any extensive account of Mill's opposition to war and his proposals for universal peace, but chiefly from an economic point of view. He rightly pointed out that Mill's opposition to war was grounded mainly on his belief that war always obstructs the progress of national wealth, and also that Mill regarded the acquisition and possession of colonies as one of the major causes of war. F. H. Kinsley summed up the leading ideas of Mill's article on the ‘Law of Nations’, but only to show how far Bentham influenced Mill's thinking in this specific area.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991
Footnotes
This paper is based on my MA dissertation submitted to the University of London in 1989. I am grateful to Dr Stephen Conway for his careful supervision and constant encouragement.
References
1 Silberner, Edmund, The Problem of War in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought, Princeton, 1946, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
2 Hinsley, F. H., Power and the Pursuit of Peace, Cambridge, 1963, pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
3 This book is a revised version of his doctoral thesis which was submitted to the University of London in 1971.
4 Bain, Alexander, James Mill: a Biography, London, 1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar; James Mill: Selected Economic Writings, ed. Winch, Donald, Edinburgh, 1966.Google Scholar
5 Saint James's Chronicle, no. 7057 (8–10 03 1803), p. 4.Google Scholar
6 Maccoby, S., English Radicalism 1786–1832, London, 1955, pp. 152–65Google Scholar; Christie, Ian R., Wars and Revolutions: Britain 1760–1815, London, 1982, pp. 257–61.Google Scholar
7 ‘Politics’, Literary Journal, i (1803), 709.Google Scholar
8 Derry, John W., Charles James Fox, London, 1972, p. 399.Google Scholar
9 ‘Note from M. Otto to Lord Hawkesbury, 17 August 1802’, Cobbett's Annual Register, iii (1803), 1005–6.Google Scholar
10 ‘From Lord Hawkesbury to Anthony Merry, 28 August 1802’, ibid., 1008–9.
11 Ibid., 1276, 1798.
12 ‘On the War with France’, Literary Journal, i. 674.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., 673.
14 Mill, James to Barclay, David, 3 01 1804, cited in Bain, p. 49.Google Scholar
15 Briggs, Asa, The Age of Improvement, London, 1959, p. 147Google Scholar; Glover, Richard, Britain at Bay, London, 1973, pp. 192–7.Google Scholar
16 ‘Politics’, Literary Journal, i (1803), 800–1.Google Scholar
17 ‘On the Present State of the British Commerce, and what is likely to be its future progress’, Literary Journal, ii (1803), 366–7.Google Scholar
18 Williams, Judith Blow, British Commercial Policy and Trade Expansion 1750–1850, Oxford, 1972, pp. 225–34.Google Scholar
19 Spence, William, Britain Independent of Commerce, London, 1807.Google Scholar William Cobbett reprinted extracts. Cf. Selected Economic Writings, ed. Winch, D., p. 29.Google Scholar
20 Selected Economic Writings, ed. Winch, p. 23.Google Scholar
21 ‘On the Commerce of Great Britain—Continued’, Literary Journal, ii (1803), 433.Google Scholar
22 ‘On the Present State of the British Commerce’, ibid., 374.
23 Halévy, Elie, England in 1815, New York, 1961, pp. 373–4.Google Scholar
24 ‘The Income Tax’, Literary Journal, i (1803), 836.Google Scholar
25 Saint James's Chronicle, no. 7551 (6–8 05 1806), p. 4.Google Scholar
26 Spater, George, William Cobbett: the Poor Man's Friend, 2 vols., Cambridge, 1982, ch. 9.Google Scholar
27 Mill, James to SirForbes, William, 9 02 1807.Google Scholar National Library of Scotland, Fettercairn Papers, Acc 4796, F3/49.
28 ‘On Peace’, Saint James's Chronicle, no. 7747 (6–8 08 1807), p. 4.Google Scholar
29 Mill, James, Commerce Defended, London, 1808, p. 119.Google Scholar
30 ‘War’, Philanthropist, iii (1813), 204.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., 204–5.
32 Ibid., 206.
33 Ibid., 198.
34 Commerce Defended, pp. 130–1.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., p. 132.
36 ‘War’, 209–11.Google Scholar
37 Ibid., 207–8.
38 Ibid., 212.
39 ‘Peace’, Philanthropist, iv (1814), 273.Google Scholar
40 ‘Colony’, in Mill, James, Essays, London, n.d., p. 31.Google Scholar
41 Ibid.
42 Ibid., pp. 32–3.
43 ‘A Solemn Review of the Custom of War’, Philanthropist, vi (1816), 153.Google Scholar
44 Mill, James to Brougham, Lord, 3 09 1832Google Scholar, University College London, Brougham Papers, 10,765, cited in Bain, p. 366.
45 ‘Law of Nations’, in Essays, p. 27.Google Scholar
46 Ibid., p. 28.
47 Ibid., p. 29.
48 Ibid., pp. 8–9.
49 Ibid., p. 32.
50 Conway, Stephen, ‘Bentham on Peace and War’, Utilitas, i (1989), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51 Ibid., 88; Bentham, Jeremy, ‘The Rationale of Reward’, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John, 11 vols., Edinburgh, 1838–1843, ii. 259.Google Scholar
52 Mill, James, The History of British India, ed. Wilson, H. H., 10 vols., 5th edn., London 1858, i. 134.Google Scholar
53 Conway, , 88.Google Scholar
54 See, for example, his evidence before the Select Committee on the Affairs of the East India Company, reprinted in Selected Economic Writings, ed. Winch, , p. 442.Google Scholar
55 Conway, , 89.Google Scholar
56 Ibid., 89–90.
57 Ibid., 90.
58 Ibid., 98.
59 Ibid., 92; Bentham, Jeremy, The Book of FallaciesGoogle Scholar, Bowring, , ii. 437.Google Scholar
60 Conway, , 93–4.Google Scholar
61 Ibid., 97–8; Bentham, Jeremy, ‘Principles of International Law’Google Scholar, Bowring, , ii. 535–71.Google Scholar
62 Howard, Michael, War and the Liberal Conscience, London, 1978, p. 31.Google Scholar
63 Read, Donald, Cobden and Bright: a Victorian Political Partnership, London, 1967, pp. 116–49.Google Scholar
64 Mill, John Stuart, ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’, Essays on Equality, Law, and Education, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1984Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, xxi. 109–24Google Scholar; ‘Treaty Obligations’, ibid., 341–8.
65 Mill, , Essays on Equality, Law, and Education, xxi. 118.Google Scholar
66 See The History of British India. Books IV, V and VI.
- 1
- Cited by