Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:32:22.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religiously inspired urbanism: Catholicism and the planning of the southern Dutch provincial cities Eindhoven and Roermond, c. 1900 to 1960

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2015

JOKS JANSSEN
JOKS JANSSEN*
Affiliation:
Wageningen University, Land Use Planning Group, Gaia Building (building nr 101), Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The discourse on twentieth-century urban planning has hidden from view the way religion (re)shaped the urban landscape. By analysing the interaction between urban development and Catholic politics in the southern Dutch provincial cities of Eindhoven and Roermond, this article argues that religious thinking, practice and institutions had considerable influence on urban planning. Religious views and ideas played an important role in the spatial transformation of these towns. The secular instruments of urban planning were used during the ‘pillarization’ period to emphasize the sensus catholicus of town and region, and to achieve the desired Catholic social and moral order.

Type
Dyos Prize winner 2014
Information
Urban History , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 135 - 157
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beentjes, P.C. (ed.), The Catholic Church and Modernity in Europe (Vienna, 2009)Google Scholar.

2 Altermatt, U., Religion und Nation. Katholizismen im Europa des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart, 2007)Google Scholar; Clarke, C. and Kaiser, W. (eds.), Culture Wars. Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Cambridge, 2009)Google Scholar.

3 Roman Catholics dominated political and social life in Brabant and Limburg provinces from the late nineteenth century to the 1960s. The percentage of Catholics in Brabant and Limburg barely changed between 1899 and 1947, and hovered close to 90%. Knippenberg, H., De religieuze kaart van Nederland: omvang en geografische spreading van de godsdienstige gezindten vanaf de Reformatie tot heden (Assen, 1992), 165–92Google Scholar.

4 Although the concept of (Catholic) pillarization seems typically Dutch, similar processes of religious mobilization can be observed throughout Europe. Righart, H., De katholieke zuil in Europa. Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar het ontstaan van verzuiling onder katholieken in Oostenrijk, Zwitserland, België en Nederland (Meppel, 1986)Google Scholar; Hellemans, S., Strijd om de moderniteit. Sociale bewegingen en verzuiling in Europa sinds 1800 (Leuven, 1990)Google Scholar.

5 For example, in the 50 years between the restoration of the episcopal hierarchy in 1853 and 1903, in total 506 new Catholic churches were consecrated. Bank, J. and van Buuren, M., 1900: The Age of Bourgeois Culture. Dutch Culture in a European Perspective, vol. III (London, 2004), 356–66Google Scholar.

6 van der Cammen, H. and de Klerk, L., The Selfmade Land. Culture and Evolution of Urban and Regional Planning in the Netherlands (Houten, 2012), 171–84Google Scholar; Wagenaar, C., Town Planning in the Netherlands since 1800. Responses to Enlightenment Ideas and Geopolitical Realities (Rotterdam, 2011), 236–40Google Scholar.

7 Kong, L., ‘Mapping “new” geographies of religion: politics and poetics in modernity’, Progress in Human Geography, 25 (2001), 211–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kong, L., ‘Global shifts, theoretical shifts: changing geographies of religion’, Progress in Human Geography, 34 (2010), 755–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Hellemans, S., ‘From “Catholicism against modernity” to the problematic “modernity of Catholicism”’, Ethical Perspectives, 2 (2001), 117–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Altermatt, U., Moderne als Problem des Katholizismus (Regensburg, 1995)Google Scholar.

9 Until recently, pillarization had been studied by Dutch historians as a national phenomenon. For a critique of national limitations in this field and an alternative transnational concept of ‘heavy communities’, which encouraged tight networks of groups throughout Europe with the same religious outlook, see van Dam, P.H., Staat van de verzuiling. Over een Nederlandse mythe (Amsterdam, 2011)Google Scholar.

10 That is not to say that urbanization as a socio-cultural phenomenon has not received scholarly attention. On the contrary, there is a growing interest in the relationship between religion and urbanization, more particularly on the impact of urbanization on religious beliefs and the ways in which the churches responded to the societal challenges that went along with it. McLeod, H. (ed.), European Religion in the Age of Great Cities: 1830–1930 (London, 1995)Google Scholar; Hitzer, B. and Schlor, J. (eds.), ‘Gods in the city: religious topographies in the age of urbanization’, Journal of Urban History, 37 (2011), 819–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 For an interesting account of the various approaches to religious spatiality in cultural geography, see Hervieu-Leger, D., ‘Space and religion: new approaches to religious spatiality in modernity’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26 (2002), 99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 M. Melchers, ‘Nederlandse kerkarchitectuur in de twintigste eeuw: functie en betekenis van het kerkgebouw in een veranderende samenleving’, University of Leiden Ph.D. thesis, 2011; J.H. Pouls, ‘Ware schoonheid of louter praal. De bisschoppelijke bouwcommissie van Roermond en de kerkelijke kunst van Limburg in de twintigste eeuw’, Nijmegen University Ph.D. thesis, 2002.

13 For a critical account of the shifting historiographical debate on traditionalism versus modernism, see Ibelings, H., ‘Het andere modernisme. Traditionalistische architectuur in Nederland 1900–1960’, Archis, 6 (1988), 36–51Google Scholar; Colenbrander, B., Stijl: norm en handschrift in de Nederlandse architectuur van de negentiende en twintigste eeuw (Rotterdam, 1993), 57–93Google Scholar.

14 Heynickx, R. and Avermaete, T. (eds.), Making a New World. Architecture and Communities in Interwar Europe (Leuven, 2012)Google Scholar.

15 There is a long-standing tradition of conceptualizing Dutch planning as a process of rational decision-making in public policy. See: van der Valk, A. and Faludi, A., Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Dordrecht, 1994)Google Scholar.

16 Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. (eds.), Planning Cultures in Europe. Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning (Farnham, 2009)Google Scholar.

17 Schuck, M., That They Be One: The Social Teaching of Papal Encyclicals 1740–1989 (Washington, DC, 1991)Google Scholar; Hornsby-Smith, M.P., An Introduction to Catholic Social Thought (Cambridge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Jos Cuypers was the son of leading Catholic architect Pierre Cuypers (1827–1921) who, in his Roermond (and later Amsterdam) studio, designed many Neo-Gothic churches in Brabant and Limburg. Oxenaar, A., P.J.H. Cuypers en het gotisch rationalisme (Rotterdam, 2009)Google Scholar.

19 Cuypers, J. and Kooken, L.P.J., ‘Uittreksel uit het uitbreidingsplan van het huidige Eindhoven in verband met dat van Groot-Eindhoven’, in Sanders, J.M. (ed.), De annexatieplannen in de agglomeratie Eindhoven (Eindhoven, 1918), 191–211Google Scholar.

20 Beekman, P.C., Stedebouwkunde en stadsbestuur (Eindhoven, 1993), 261Google Scholar.

21 For a long time, the parish church lay at the heart of the European town, generally supplemented by other types of churches and ecclesiastical institutions and later also governmental and commercial ones. Schilling, H., ‘Calvinist and Catholic cities – urban architecture and ritual in confessional Europe’, European Review, 12 (2004), 293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 The parish defined the geographical and social boundary of many people's world for some considerable time and it tended to dominate human associations. Sheldrake, P., Spaces for the Sacred: Place, Memory, and Identity (Baltimore, 2001), 147–71Google Scholar.

23 Kools, G.C., ‘De uitbreiding van Eindhoven’, Tijdschrift voor Volkshuisvesting en Stedebouw, 5 (1925), 129–34Google Scholar.

24 Otten, A. and Klijn, E., Philips’ woningbouw 1900–1990: fundament van Woningstichting Hertog Hendrik van Lotharingen (Zaltbommel, 1991)Google Scholar.

25 Kalb, D., Expanding Class: Power and Everyday Politics in Industrial Communities, The Netherlands 1850–1950 (Durham, NC, 1998)Google Scholar.

26 Bosma, K., J.M. de Casseres. De eerste planoloog (Rotterdam, 2003)Google Scholar.

27 Schut, P. Bakker (ed.), Rapport betreffende het uitbreidingsplan van Eindhoven en de daarop door den Directeur van Gemeentewerken gegeven beschouwingen (Eindhoven, 1927)Google Scholar.

28 Bosma, K., ‘Town and regional planning in the Netherlands: 1920–1945’, Planning Perspectives, 2 (1990), 125–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Referring to the pre-liberal, pre-industrial agrarian society, the architects of the ‘Delft School’ developed a ‘vernacular’ view and style of urban design, which focused above all on expressing the spiritual. de Heer, J., ‘De Delftsche school en de katholieke architecten tussen 1945 en 1955’, Eltheto. Tijdschrift over godsdienst en politiek, 64 (1979), 21–105Google Scholar.

30 Granpré Molière preached a ‘true art’, which must bear witness to God's plan. As a result, he dismissed modern art forms as ‘passing heresy’. He pointed to medieval society, which he held up as the ideal Christian community. Pouls, J., ‘De kunstenaarsdagen van de Algemene Katholieke Kunstenaarsvereniging in Huijbergen (1932–1940). Bakermat van de Delftse School’, Trajecta, 2 (2001), 161–83Google Scholar.

31 Peet, J., ‘De traditie van land en volk, een ideologie in het RK Bouwblad’, Plan, 2 (1976), 17–32, at 31Google Scholar.

32 Bouwkunst, Studiekring Kerkelijke, Katholiek cultuurwerk in Brabant. Hoe in dit gewest uitgebreid en gebouwd dient te worden (‘s-Hertogenbosch, 1933)Google Scholar.

33 This nostalgic image of Brabant as a traditional rural and Catholic province was contrasted to dominant Calvinist Holland and modernity. The opposition to Holland was based on their direct rule of Brabant during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, which was presented as an illegitimate occupation by a foreign Protestant State. Rooijakkers, G., Rituele repertoires. Volkscultuur in oostelijk Noord-Brabant, 1559–1853 (Nijmegen, 1994), 53–66Google Scholar.

34 Eindhoven Regional Historical Centre (RHCE), Eindhoven Municipal Works files (EMW) 71, minutes of De Meierij regional planning committee meeting, 6 Mar. 1934.

35 Janssen, J., Vooruit denken en verwijlen. De (re)constructie van het plattelandschap in Zuidoost-Brabant, 1920–2000 (Tilburg, 2006), 153–5Google Scholar.

36 Walravens, J., ‘Lonkend perspectief of afschrikwekkend toekomstbeeld? Het Welvaartsplan voor Noord-Brabant (1947–1949)’, in van der Lans, J. (ed.), In verband met Brabant. Beschouwingen bij het vijftigjarig bestaan van het PON (Tilburg, 1997), 15–34Google Scholar.

37 It was believed that halting the migration of the working class to the (big) cities would preserve Catholic rural society and prevent social unrest, which, in turn, would be good for attracting capital investment to the industry. Janssen, Vooruit denken, 125–32.

38 Brabant Historical Information Centre, Provincial Planning Authority files (PPD) 710, meeting to install Big City Advisory Committee, 23 Oct. 1954.

39 Janssen, J., ‘Town planning as a socio-religious issue. The “big city” advisory committee and the urban redevelopment of Eindhoven and its environs, 1945–1960’, Planning Perspectives 4 (2013), 521–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 RHCE/EMW 42, Kolfschoten memorandum, 26 Nov. 1954.

41 The Dutch variant of the neighbourhood unit concept was first introduced in post-war Rotterdam and would dominate Dutch urban planning for several decades. Wagenaar, Town planning, 365–8.

42 The concept seemed an opportunity for the churches to actualize their biblical message. It could strengthen the creation of a Christian community. To the Catholics, this meant that the neighbourhood and the parish should geographically converge. Doevendans, C. and Stolzenburg, R., ‘De Kerken en de wijkgedachte: een opmerkelijke geschiedenis’, in Doevendans, C. and Hart, G. (eds.), Het Kerkgebouw in het postindustriële landschap (Zoetermeer, 2004), 265–74Google Scholar.

43 Jenniskens, M., ‘Vijftig jaar KASKI-onderzoek 1946–1996’, in Spruit, L. (ed.), Vijftig jaar KASKI onderzoek 1946–1996. Sociaal wetenschappelijk onderzoek, studie en advies ten behoeve van kerk en samenleving in Nederland (Den Haag and Nijmegen, 1997), 9–47Google Scholar.

44 Bosma, K., Ruimte voor een nieuwe tijd. Vormgeving van den Nedelandse regio, 1900–1945 (Rotterdam, 1993), 25Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., 28.

46 Beckers, N., ‘De organisatie van het Streekplanwerk in Limburg’, Tijdschrift voor Volshuisvesting en Stedebouw, 7/8 (1938), 150–2Google Scholar.

47 Beckers, Th.A.M., De kwestie Maasniel. Strijd om identiteit (Utrecht, 2006), 71Google Scholar.

48 In the nineteenth century, astronomer Edouard Roche had declared that the rings around the planet Saturn were the remains of moons pulled apart by gravitational forces. Roche had calculated that, if two celestial bodies in a solar system came too close to each other, the continued existence of the smaller of the two – the satellite – would become impossible, and it would be destroyed. van Meurs, P.K. and van Lohuizen, T.K., ‘De stedenbouwkundige, economische en sociale oorzaken en gevolgen van parasitaire randbebouwing’, Tijdschrift voor Volkshuisvesting en Stedebouw, 1 (1939)Google Scholar.

49 Struycken, J., De gemeente en haar gebied (Arnhem, 1925), 39Google Scholar.

50 van Haren, C.Ch.A., Samenwerking van gemeenten (Alphen aan den Rijn, 1936)Google Scholar.

51 On the anti-Holland sentiment in the development of a Limburg regional identity, see Perry, J., ‘“t Nachtegaaltje zingt”. Regionalisme in Nederlands-Limburg 1900–1950’, Jaarboek van Sociaal Historisch Centrum voor Limburg, 52 (2007), 7–46Google Scholar.

52 Reymer, P.J., Het eigene van het staatsgezag (Maastricht, 1942)Google Scholar.

53 Bakvis, H., Catholic Power in the Netherlands (Montreal, 1981), 66Google Scholar.

54 Jos Klijnen (1887–1973) was born in Maastricht and worked in Cuypers’ Amsterdam studio while studying architecture and urban design at Delft University of Technology. After the war, Pieter Verhagen, national co-ordinator of the reconstruction effort, appointed him advisor for the reconstruction of Limburg. Beckers, De kwestie Maasniel, 114.

55 Schipper, K. and van Geest, J., Jos Klijnen (Rotterdam, 1999)Google Scholar.

56 Regional Historical Centre Limburg (RHCL), PPD, letter from Maasniel municipal executive to PPD permanent committee, 2 Dec. 1953.

57 Economisch Technologisch Instituut Limburg, Korte inleidingen over werkzaamheden ETIL (Maastricht, 1954), 13Google Scholar.

58 van Haren, C.C.A., Advies over de ontwerpregeling van Gedeputeerde Staten van Noord-Brabant tot wijziging der grenzen van Aarle-Rixtel, Bakel, Beek en Donk, Deurne, Geldrop, Someren en tot opheffing van de gemeenten Stiphout en Mierlo, uitgebracht aan de gemeentebesturen van Aarle-Rixtel, Bakel, Mierlo en Stiphout (‘s-Gravenhage, 1949), 11Google Scholar.

59 Hellemans, Strijd om de moderniteit, 129–34.

60 Storm, E., ‘Regionalism in history, 1890–1945: the cultural approach’, European History Quarterly, 2 (2003), 251–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 On how this regionalist Catholic identity discourse in part still resonates today, see Terlouw, K. and van Gorp, B.H., ‘Layering spatial identities: the identity discourses of new regions’, Environment and Planning A, 4 (2014), 852–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Altermatt, U., Katholizismus und Moderne. Zur Sozial- und Mentalitatsgeschichte der Schweizer Katholiken im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Zurich, 1990), 133–80Google Scholar; Hellemans, ‘From “Catholicism against modernity”’, 119.

63 M. van den Bos, ‘Verlangen naar vernieuwing. Nederlands Katholicisme 1953–2000’, Ph.D. thesis Amsterdam University, 2012, 73–90.

64 Jenniskens, ‘Vijftig jaar’, 40.

65 Doevendans and Stolzenburg, ‘De Kerken’, 270.

66 For an interesting account on the shift from the territorialization of the parish towards a more ‘modern’ sociological interpretation of the parish structure, see Chatelan, O., L’Église et la ville. Le diocèse de Lyon à l’épreuve de l’urbanisation, 1954–1975 (Paris, 2012)Google Scholar.