Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T19:11:23.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planning permanent air raid precautions: architecture, air war and the changing perceptions of British cities in the late 1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

ADAM PAGE
ADAM PAGE*
Affiliation:
Leuphana Universität, MECS, Scharnhorstr. 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article considers how the imagination and expectation of future air raids impacted upon the perception of the built environment, and asks how the boundaries between peace and war, and thus military and civilian, began to be dissolved in this context. It examines the interactions between architects, planners and government officials about how the design of cities and buildings might change in an age of air power. By looking at changes and continuities either side of the 1938 Munich crisis, it examines how the civilian space of cities was recast in anticipation of war.

Type
Dyos Prize winner 2014
Information
Urban History , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 117 - 134
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Forster, E.M., ‘Post-Munich’, in Two Cheers for Democracy (London, 1951), 34.Google Scholar The essay was first published as ‘The 1939 State’, New Statesman and Nation (10 Jun. 1939).

2 Baker, J., Enterprise versus Bureaucracy: The Development of Structural Air-Raid Precautions during the Second World War (Oxford, 1978), 4.Google Scholar

3 Forster, ‘Post-Munich’, 34.

4 Biddle, T. Davis, Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Ideas about Strategic Bombing (Princeton, 2002)Google Scholar; Barros, A., ‘Razing Babel and the problems of constructing peace: France, Great Britain and air power, 1916–28’, English Historical Review, 126 (2011), 75–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holman, B., ‘The shadow of the airliner: commercial bombers and the rhetorical destruction of Britain, 1917–35’, Twentieth Century British History, 24 (2013), 495–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grayzel, S., At Home and under Fire: Air Raids and Culture in Britain from the Great War to the Blitz (Cambridge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Travers, T.H.E., ‘Future warfare: H.G. Wells and British military theory, 1895–1916’, in Bond, B. and Roy, I. (eds.), War and Society: A Yearbook of Military History (London, 1976), 67–87Google Scholar; Ceadel, M., ‘Popular fiction and the next war, 1918–1939’, in Gloversmith, F. (ed.), Class, Culture and Social Change: A New View of the 1930s (Brighton, 1980), 161–84Google Scholar; Lindqvist, S., A History of Bombing, trans. Rugg, L. (New York, 2001)Google Scholar; Saint-Amour, P. K., ‘Air war prophecy and interwar modernism’, Comparative Literature Studies, 42 (2005), 130–61.Google Scholar

6 An exception is Cohen, J.-L., Architecture in Uniform: Designing and Building for the Second World War (Paris and London, 2011).Google Scholar

7 Edgerton, D., Warfare State: Britain, 1920–1970 (Cambridge, 2006), 287.Google Scholar

8 Most of the work on cities and war has focused on reconstruction, and the two World Wars are largely absent from the major urban history of modern Britain, M. Daunton (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. III: 1840–1950 (Cambridge, 2000). Some recent work has begun to address the relationship between cities and war in the twentieth century; see Goebel, S. and Keene, D. (eds.), Cities into Battlefields: Metropolitan Scenarios, Experiences and Commemorations of Total War (Farnham, 2011)Google Scholar; Funck, M. and Chickering, R., Endangered Cities: Military Power and Urban Societies in the Era of the World Wars (Boston, MA, 2004).Google Scholar

9 Foucault, M., Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78, trans. Burchell, G., ed. Davidson, A. (Basingstoke, 2007), 20.Google Scholar

10 Mort, F., ‘Fantasies of metropolitan life: planning London in the 1940s’, Journal of British Studies, 43 (2004), 120–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Ortolano, G., ‘Planning the urban future in 1960s Britain’, Historical Journal, 54 (2011), 494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Mumford, L., The Culture of Cities, 7th edn (London, 1953), 275.Google Scholar

13 Garforth, Col. W., ‘A few principles of protection in air raids’, Journal of the RIBA, 43 (8 Aug. 1936), 985–9.Google Scholar

14 Grayzel, At Home and under Fire, 201.

15 Garforth, ‘A few principles of protection’, 985.

16 For the establishment of the sub-committee and their first report which emphasized the ‘moral effect’ and the inevitability of civilian casualties see Grayzel, At Home and under Fire, 124–38.

17 The National Archives, London (TNA), Cabinet Papers (CAB) 24/255, R.R. Scott, Air Raid Precautions Memorandum, Jun. 1935.

18 Meisel, J.S., ‘Air raid shelter policy and its critics in Britain before the Second World War’, Twentieth Century British History, 5 (1994), 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Times, 11 Jul. 1935, 9. For a discussion of the press response to the circular see Grayzel, At Home and under Fire, 201–5.

19 For the shelter debate see Meisel, ‘Air raid shelter policy’.

20 The papers of the structural precautions committee are in TNA, Home Office (HO) 211/1–6. British architects generally took a more central role in debates over the protection of civilians from air raids than elsewhere in Europe where these discussions were also being held, Cohen, Architecture in Uniform, 161.

21 Garforth, ‘A few principles of protection’, 989, 987.

22 T. Scott and R. Coppock, quoted in ibid., 989, 990.

23 ‘Journal’, Journal of the RIBA, 45 (27 Jun. 1938), 780.

24 Scott, T., ‘Air raid precautions as a problem for the architect’, Journal of the RIBA, 45 (27 Jun. 1938), 783, 786.Google Scholar

25 Bird, E., ‘Some general principles of structural A.R.P.’, Journal of the RIBA, 45 (27 Jun. 1938), 788–9.Google Scholar

26 TNA, Ministry of Transport (MT) 50/56, Committee of Imperial Defence, ‘Review of precautionary measures (civil defence) taken during the Czechoslovakian crisis, Sept. 1938’, 14 Nov. 1938.

27 Ibid., 4–5.

28 This is an idea discussed more broadly in Dudziak, M., War Time: An Idea, its History, its Consequences (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar

29 TNA, MT 50/56, ‘Review of precautionary measures’, 7.

30 Ibid., 4.

31 T. O’Brien, Civil Defence (London, 1955), 113.

32 Morrison, H., ‘Road architecture – the need for a plan’, Journal of the RIBA, 46 (20 Mar. 1939), 508, 506.Google Scholar

33 ‘ARP – The informal meeting’, Journal of the RIBA, 46 (9 Jan. 1939), 240.

34 Pearson, S.V., London's Overgrowth and the Causes of Swollen Towns (London, 1939), 9.Google Scholar

35 Holford, W., ‘The next twenty years’, Journal of the RIBA, 46 (5 Dec. 1938), 171.Google Scholar

36 The article was anonymous, part of a series ‘prepared by an authority on air bombardment with the advice of a number of experts’, ‘A realistic plan for ARP’, Picture Post, 21 Jan. 1939, 54.

37 Ibid., 54–5.

38 Ibid., 56–8.

39 These ideas discussed in a review of architectural developments in Europe in American journal Architectural Record, ‘What does military design offer the architecture of peace?’ Architectural Record, 85 (Jan. 1939), 50–6.

40 Sir Alexander Rouse's remarks are quoted at the opening of a meeting on Town Planning and Air Raids by the Basingstoke Town Planning Department, Hampshire Record Office: 12M75/DDC398, ‘Town planning and air-raid protection’ issued by the Town Planning Department, Basingstoke, 28 Sep. 1939, 1.

41 The proceedings of a meeting between a Committee of the Town Planning Institute, the ARP Department and the Ministry of Health held in Jan. 1937 are quoted in ibid., 1–2.

42 While still a significant number it was some way short of the 3,500,000 people the government had planned to move, and indeed it was some time before the shortfall in take-up was realized, R. Titmuss, Problems of Social Policy, 2nd edn (Westport, 1971), 101–2.

43 ‘Evacuation begins’, Manchester Guardian, 1 Sep. 1939, 8.

44 ‘Children of London leave home’, Manchester Guardian, 3 Sep. 1939, 9.

45 Süβ, D., ‘Wartime societies and shelter politics in national socialist Germany and Britain’, in Overy, R., Baldoli, C. and Knapp, A. (eds.), Bombing, States and Peoples in Western Europe, 1940–1945 (London, 2011), 24.Google Scholar

46 Pynchon, T., Gravity's Rainbow (London, 2000), 3 (emphasis in the original).Google Scholar

47 For the Finsbury scheme see Meisel, ‘Air raid shelter policy’; Harwood, J., ‘The other end of the trajectory: danger zones’, Grey Room, 54 (2014), 80–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Hall, H. Austen, letter to the editor, Journal of the RIBA, 46 (7 Nov. 1938), 43.Google Scholar

49 Bylander, S., letter to the editor, Journal of the RIBA, 46 (21 Nov. 1938), 100.Google Scholar

50 TNA, Housing and Local Government (HLG) 7/42, John Anderson letter to Walter Elliot, 28 Nov. 1938.

51 TNA, HLG 7/42, W.M. Browing, ‘Memorandum’, 3 Nov. 1938 (underlined in original).

52 London Metropolitan Archives (LMA), London County Council (LCC), CE/WAR/1/7, Town Planning and Building Regulation Committee, 18 Jul. 1938.

53 LMA, LCC/CE/WAR/1/7, E.P. Wheeler, ‘Report by the architect to the council’, 15 Jul. 1938, 1–3.

54 LMA, LCC/CE/WAR/1/7, Committee of Imperial Defence ARP meeting, 18 Dec. 1934.

55 LMA, LCC/CE/WAR/1/7, correspondence between A. Steele-Perkins and T. Pierson-Frank, 22–3 Nov. 1935.

56 LMA, LCC/CE/WAR/1/7, note from ARP department, 28 Apr. 1938.

57 LMA, LCC/CE/WAR/1/14, Bressey report quoted in LCC Highways Committee meeting, 10 Feb. 1939, 1.

58 LMA, LCC/CE/WAR/1/14, LCC Highways Committee, 10 Feb. 1939, 1–4.

59 The papers relating to these discussions are found in TNA, HO 186/149.

60 TNA, HO 186/149, minutes of meeting held on 19 Jul. 1939 at Ministry of Transport, 3–5.

61 TNA, HO 186/149, Lord Ashfield, ‘Use of the Board's tube railways in a national emergency’, 21 Jun. 1939, 1–2.

62 TNA, HO/186/149, minutes of meeting held on 19 Jul. 1939 at Ministry of Transport, 5.

63 Meisel, ‘Air raid shelter policy’, 317.

64 Grayzel, At Home and under Fire, 147.

65 O’Brien, Civil Defence, 224, 295.

66 Ortolano, ‘Planning the urban future’, 482.

67 See for example Graham, S., Cities under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (London, 2011)Google Scholar; Cowen, D. and Gilbert, E. (eds.), War, Citizenship, Territory (New York, 2008)Google Scholar; Graham, S. (ed.), Cities, War and Terrorism: Towards and Urban Geopolitics (London, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.