Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010
Despite the fact that sporting spaces reflect key shifts in thinking about town planning, sports architecture is still an underexplored area in the historiography of urban design. The architects, engineers and designers attempting to regenerate and rejuvenate cities after World War II were aware of the popular interest in competitive sports. Stadia and landscape design were intended to help erase the negative urban images of nationalism and totalitarianism. By starting a dialogue with the past, town planners questioned the grandeur and monumentalism prevalent in architecture since the late nineteenth century. They sought to rediscover and redefine the modern.
1 Wharton, A.J., Building the Cold War. Hilton International Hotels and Modern Architecture (Chicago, 2001)Google Scholar.
2 Bale, J., ‘Introduction’, in Bale, J. and Moen, O. (eds.), The Stadium and the City (Keele, 1995), 11–20Google Scholar.
3 Cf. Crowley, D. and Reid, S.E. (eds.), Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc (Oxford, 2002), 4–5Google Scholar; Stokes, R., ‘In search of the socialist artefact: technology and ideology in East Germany, 1945–1962’, German History, 15 (1997), 221–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Lefebvre, H., The Production of Space (Oxford, 1991), 59Google Scholar.
5 Relph, E., The Modern Urban Landscape (Baltimore, 1987), 8–10Google Scholar.
6 Kotsonis, Y., ‘Introduction: a modern paradox – subject and citizen in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Russia’, in Hoffmann, D.L., Kotsonis, Y. (eds.), Russian Modernity: Politics, Knowledge, Practices (London, 2000), 2Google Scholar.