Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:16:39.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Guild of Help and the changing face of Edwardian philanthropy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2009

Keith Laybourn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Guild of Help was formed at Bradford in 1904 with the idea of introducing a new, more community-based, approach to deal with the increasingly important problem of poverty. It emerged to overcome the failures of charity and the threat of increased state intervention, seeking instead to get all the community to take responsibility for the poor. The movement spread rapidly and soon became a major constituent of voluntary urban relief in Britain. Yet, in the end, its community approach failed, largely because solving the problem of poverty was well beyond its means, and intent, but also because it was unable to draw the churches, the working classes and charities into working with the well-regulated system of help for the poor which it envisaged.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 43 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The comments of an anonymous referee are warmly appreciated. I would also like to thank the Twenty-Seven Foundation for its financial assistance.

References

1 Bradford Guild of Help, minutes, 1903–6.

2 Help, vol. I, 1, 10 1905.Google Scholar

3 Ibid.

4 Cahill, M. and Jowitt, T., ‘The New Philanthropy: the emergence of the Bradford City Guild of Help’, Journal of Social Policy, 9, 3 (1980), 370–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; H.B. Priestman and Jacob Moser would regard themselves as advanced rather than New Liberals.

5 Mr and Mrs Hoffman, Mr and Mrs J. Moser and F.F. Steinthal. Others of German origin included C.C. Leiblich, the Edelsteins, the Delius family, the Wolffs, the Mahlers, and the Behrens.

6 Sutter, J., Britain's Next Campaign (London, 1903), 274.Google Scholar

7 Help, vol. I, 2, 11 1905Google Scholar; vol. II, 3, December 1906, incorporating the Second Annual Report, 3.

8 Report of the Proceedings, National Association of the Guild of Help, 1911Google Scholar, appendix; Moore, M.J., ‘Social work and social welfare: the organisation of philanthropic resources in Britain, 1900–1914’, The Journal of British Studies (Spring 1977), 94.Google ScholarPubMed

9 Brasnett, M., Voluntary Social Action: a History of the National Council of Social Services 1919–1969 (London, 1969), 1–18.Google Scholar

10 The Bradford Unemployed Emergency Committee, Report (1894).Google Scholar

11 Bradford Daily Telegraph, 4 02 1903Google Scholar; Forward, 20 10 1904Google Scholar; Laybourn, K., ‘The defence of bottom dog: the Independent Labour Party in local politics’, in Wright, D.G. and Jowitt, T. (eds), Victorian Bradford (Bradford, 1981), 232.Google Scholar

12 Forward, 28 01 1905.Google Scholar

13 Wakefield, E.W., ‘The growth of charity organisation in the north of England’, Charity Organisation Review, xxiv (1908), 40.Google Scholar

14 Snowden, G.R., Report to the President of the Local Government Board on Guilds of Help in England (Cd. 56664, 1911), 16–17.Google Scholar

15 The Helper, vol. VII, 3, 03 1913Google Scholar, report of a paper by Loch, C.S. at a conference of CO societies, 24 01 1913.Google Scholar

16 Macadam, E., The New Philanthropy (London, 1934), 18.Google Scholar

17 Simey, M.B., Charitable Effort in Liverpool (Liverpool, 1951), 4.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., 124–36.

19 Help, vol. IV, 3, 12 1908.Google Scholar

20 Borough of Pool League of Help, minutes, 13 04 1908.Google Scholar

21 Guild, Bradford, minute book, 23 10 1905.Google Scholar

22 Guild, Bradford, minute book, 15 11 1905.Google Scholar

23 Moore, , ‘Social work’, 95.Google Scholar

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid., 96.

26 Francis, E.G., ‘The probable effects of the Insurance Act on the work of the Guilds of Help’, Report of the NAGH (1914), 17–24.Google Scholar

27 Milledge, W., ‘The future of the Guild of Help: how to give it permanence and authority’, Report of the NAGH (1914), 22–36.Google Scholar

28 McBriar, A.M., An Edwardian Mixed Doubles: The Bosanquets versus the Webbs (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar

29 Snowden, , Guilds, 8–9, 12–15.Google Scholar

30 ‘Proceedings of the Council’, The Reporter, 10 11 1913Google Scholar; Moore, , ‘Social work’, 98.Google Scholar

31 Poole League of Help, minutes, 18 11 1907.Google Scholar

32 The Helper, vol. I, 1, 01 1909, 8.Google Scholar

33 Help, vol. I, 12, 11 1906.Google Scholar

34 County Borough ofBolton Guild of Help. Third Annual Report, 11 1908, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Snowden, , Guilds, 7.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., 19.

37 Ibid., 7.

38 Ibid., 19.

39 Halifax Citizen's Guild of Help, Fifth Annual Report 1909–10, 4.Google Scholar

40 Bradford City Guild of Help, casebooks 1603, 1620, 1908, 2205, 2359, 2523, 2561 and 3378.

41 Help, vol. I, 6, 24.Google Scholar

42 CGH, Bradford, minutes, 15 11 1904.Google Scholar

43 Ibid., minutes, 30 November 1904.

44 Ibid., minutes, 12 December 1904.

45 Help, vol. I, 4, 01 1906.Google Scholar

46 CGH, Bradford, casebook 2523, 16 12 1907.Google Scholar

47 Hartley, E.R. letter, Forward, 24 03 1906.Google Scholar

48 Snowden, , Guilds, 5.Google Scholar

49 Brasnett, , Voluntary Social Action, 6.Google Scholar

50 Moore, , ‘Social work’, 91–2.Google Scholar

51 Bolton, Bradford, Croydon, Eccles, Halifax, Middlesbrough, Poole, Reading and Warrington guilds have the best collections.

52 Forward, 24 03 1906.Google Scholar

53 CBBGH Magazine, vol. II, 5, 02 1908.Google Scholar

54 Ibid., 11, August 1908.

55 Forward, 10 03 1906.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., 24 March 1906.

57 Yeo, S., Religion and Voluntary Organisation (London, 1976), 228Google Scholar; Reading Observer, 16 01 1909.Google Scholar

58 Help, vol. I, 6, 03 1906.Google Scholar

59 The Helper, vol. III, 2, 03 1911.Google Scholar

60 MissReddish, Sarah was born in 1850 and died in 02 1928Google Scholar; Bolton Journal, 18 02 1913Google Scholar; Bolton Journal and Guardian, 24 02 1928Google Scholar; Hollis, P., Ladies Elect: Women in English Local Government 1865–1914 (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar

61 Help, vol. IV, 2, 11 1908.Google Scholar

62 Yeo, , Religion, 229.Google Scholar

63 Cahill, and Jowitt, , ‘The New Philanthropy’, 229.Google Scholar

64 Rowntree, B.S., ‘Social Symposium 1: The social worker’, Friends Quarterly Examiner, xxxviii (1904), 73.Google Scholar

65 The Helper, vol. II, 05 1910Google Scholar, quoting P. Bageral of Harrogate, a Local Government Board Inspector for the Poor Law.

66 CGH, Bradford, Seventh Annual Report, 1910–11Google Scholar, and Fifteenth Annual Report, 1918–19Google Scholar. The latter stated that there were 31,723 names on the register.

67 Snowden, , Guilds, 9.Google Scholar

68 Ibid., 11; The Helper, vol. II, 09 1910Google Scholar, notes that Halifax Guild was formed largely due to the efforts of a committee of clergy and others in January 1905, mainly due to Rev. Canon Savage, Vicar of Halifax. The Poole League of Help was formed by the Rector, Rev. Reginald Fawkes, who organized a preliminary meeting on 28 October 1907.

69 Poole League of Help, minutes, 20 01 1908.Google Scholar

70 Hints to Helpers, quoted in Kidd, A.J., ‘Charity organisation and the unemployed in Manchester c. 1870–1914’, Social History, 9 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar