Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:06:06.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governmentality on the Park Hill estate: the rationality of public housing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2010

MATTHEW HOLLOW
MATTHEW HOLLOW*
Affiliation:
Wolfson College, University of Oxford, Linton Road, Oxford, OX2 6DU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article evaluates the inherent ambiguity of the landmark Park Hill housing estate in Sheffield, England. Incorporating Foucault's theories on governmentality and biopolitics, this article explores how techniques of power and control radically affected the way this building was both used and viewed. It shows how conflicting discourses about human needs and desires influenced the way that subjects were housed, managed and regulated in Sheffield during the supposedly homogeneous welfare-state years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 117 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I. Soutar, ‘Park Hill in the limelight’, Sheffield Telegraph, 15 Feb. 2008, 5.

2 Note that Hyde Park, which was designed to complement the Park Hill project, was constructed between 1960 and 1965 on an adjoining site and provided a further 1,322 dwellings. See Sheffield Local Studies Collection (SLS), Housing and Local Government Files (HLG) MP 4107M, Sheffield Housing Corporation: Report of a Visit by Treasury Officers (Feb. 1968).

3 Glendinning, M. and Muthesius, S., Tower Block: Modern Public Housing in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (Yale, 1994), 127Google Scholar.

4 Smithson, A., Urban Structuring: Studies of Alison & Peter Smithson (New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Smithson, A., Team 10 Primer (London, 1968)Google Scholar. Lynn and Smith actually worked with the Smithsons on the ‘deck access’ system during their time at the Architectural Association in London.

5 See for example, Bacon, C., Park Hill in its Social Context (Sheffield, 1985)Google Scholar; R. Banham, ‘Park Hill housing, Sheffield’, Architectural Review (Dec. 1961), 403–10; Abbott, D. and Pollit, K., Hill Housing: A Comparative Study (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Glendinning and Muthesius, Tower Block, 125–31.

6 See Bacon, Park Hill, 47–61.

7 Quoted in C. Windle, ‘Retreat up the hill’, The Times: Bricks and Mortar (6 Jul. 2007), 7. See also SLS/HLG 711.595F, Sheffield City Council, Park Hill Development Brief (Sheffield, 2004).

8 In December 1998 the estate became a Grade II listed building.

9 Note that (at time of print) renovation work is now currently underway on the site.

10 Bonta, J.P., Architecture and its Interpretations: A Study of Expressive Systems in Architecture (London, 1979)Google Scholar, discusses many of the issues that arise when trying to ‘read’ buildings.

11 Ravetz, A., Council Housing and Culture: The History of a Social Experiment (London, 2001), 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 A point that is also made in Whyte, W., ‘How do buildings mean? Some issues of interpretation in the history of architecture’, History and Theory, 45 (May 2006), 171–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Cole, I. and Furbey, R., The Eclipse of Council Housing (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Swenarton, M., Homes Fit for Heroes: The Politics and Architecture of Early State Housing in Britain (London, 1981)Google Scholar; Malpass, P. and Murie, A., Housing Policy and Practice, 5th edn (London, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Dunleavy, P., The Politics of Mass Housing in Britain 1945–1975: A Study of Corporate Power and Professional Influence in the Welfare State (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar; B. Finnimore, ‘The industrialisation of housing: building systems and social housing in postwar Britain, 1942–1975’ (University of London Ph.D. thesis, 1986).

15 Power, A., Property before People: The Management of Twentieth-Century Council Housing (London, 1987)Google Scholar; Towers, G., Shelter Is Not Enough: Transforming Multi-Storey Housing (Bristol, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Donald, J., Imagining the Modern City (London, 1999)Google Scholar; Ravetz, Council Housing and Culture, 193–228; Fyfe, N. R. (ed.), Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space (London, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glendinning and Muthesius, Tower Block.

17 Foucault, M., ‘Governmentality’, in Faubion, J. D. (ed.), Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. III: Power (London, 2002), 219–20Google Scholar.

18 Foucault, M., ‘Questions of method’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (London, 1991), 74Google Scholar.

19 M. Foucault, ‘Politics and the study of discourse’, in Burchell, Gordon and Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect, 61. The best example of this is probably in Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, A. (London, 1977)Google Scholar.

20 C. Gordon, ‘Governmental rationality’, in Burchell, Gordon and Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect, 14.

21 Foucault, M., ‘The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (New York, 1997), 300Google Scholar.

22 T. Crosby, ‘Multi-storey housing for Sheffield’, Architectural Design (Jun. 1955), 192.

23 This is perhaps most evident in Foucault, M., The History of Sexuality, vol. I, trans. Hurley, Robert (London, 1981)Google Scholar.

24 Foucault, M., ‘The birth of biopolitics’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.), Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. I: Ethics (London, 2000), 73Google Scholar.

25 Burns, W., New Towns for Old: The Technique of Urban Renewal (London, 1963), 99Google Scholar.

26 SirSillitoe, P., Cloak without Dagger (London, 1955), 45Google Scholar; Foster, H., ‘Some aspects of the Sheffield development plan’, in Linton, D. L. (ed.), Sheffield and its Region: A Scientific and Historical Survey (Sheffield, 1956), 243Google Scholar.

27 Foucault, M., ‘Right of death and power over life’, in Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault Reader (New York, 1984), 261Google Scholar.

28 Donald, Imagining the Modern City, 31.

29 Central Housing Advisory Committee (CHAC), Design of Dwellings: Dudley Report (London, 1944); CHAC, Councils and their Houses (London, 1959); Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHLG), Homes for Today and Tomorrow: Parker Morris Report (London, 1961).

30 MHLG, The Density of Residential Areas (London, 1952).

31 Womersley's letter is reprinted in Bacon, Park Hill, 9.

32 Glendinning and Muthesius, Tower Block, 66–8.

33 M. Foucault, ‘Panopticism’, in Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader, 208.

34 Berman, M., All that Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity, 2nd edn (London, 1988), 16Google Scholar.

35 M. Foucault, ‘Space, knowledge, and power’, in Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader, 245.

36 Fishman, R., Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Le Corbusier (Cambridge, 1982), 182–8Google Scholar.

37 Scott, J.C., Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale, 1998), 104Google Scholar.

38 Foster, ‘Some aspects of the Sheffield development plan’, 243.

39 Scott, Seeing like a State, 115.

40 Foucault, ‘Panopticism’, 207.

41 Young, M.D., Family and Kinship in East London (London, 1957)Google Scholar; Group, Midland (ed.), Nigel Henderson: Photographs of Bethnal Green, 1949–1952 (Nottingham, 1978)Google Scholar; Smithson, Team 10 Primer.

42 SLS/Local Pamphlets, vol. 205, no. 1 04256, City of Sheffield Housing Committee (CSHC), Multi-Storey Housing in Some European Countries: Report on Findings and Provisional Plan (Sheffield, 1955), 52–3.

43 SLS/Local Pamphlets, vol. 30, 04256, City of Sheffield Architects’ Department, Park Hill Redevelopment: Part II (Sheffield, 1958), 2.

44 SLS/Local Pamphlets, vol. 30, 04256, 49.

45 The ‘birth’ of the social subject is brilliantly traced in Rabinow, P., French Modern: Norms and Forms of the Social Environment (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

46 Rose, N., Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge, 1999), 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Ericksen, E.G., Urban Behavior (New York, 1954), 5Google Scholar.

48 Mitchell, C.D., Lupton, T., Hodges, M.W. and Smith, C.S., Neighbourhood and Community (Liverpool, 1954), 147–8Google Scholar.

49 Glendinning and Muthesius, Tower Block, 2.

50 Rabinow, French Modern, 67.

51 See Rose, N., Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London, 1989), 229–39Google Scholar.

52 DrHalmos, P., Solitude and Privacy: A Study of Social Isolation, its Causes and Therapy (London, 1952), 141Google Scholar.

53 Slayton, W.L. and Dewey, R., ‘Urban redevelopment and the urbanite’, in Woodbury, C. (ed.), The Future of Cities and Urban Development (Chicago, 1953), 297Google Scholar.

54 A. Smithson, ‘Decisions’, Architectural Design (Jun. 1956), 230.

55 Liepmann, K., The Journey to Work: Its Significance for Industrial and Community Life (London, 1944), 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 CHAC, Moving from the Slums (London, 1956), 6. This facet of the plan is also explored in SLS/HLG 331.8335G, Garnsey, S., The Community in the Sky: Life on the Park Hill Flats (Sheffield, 1980), 5Google Scholar.

57 SLS/HLG MP 4871M, ‘Appraisal of Park Hill redevelopment, Sheffield’ (Jul. 1963), 282.

58 Ibid.

59 SLS/HLG 331.8335G, CSHC, Park Hill Survey (1962), 9.

60 SLS/HLG MP 4871M, ‘Appraisal of Park Hill’, 283.

61 Foucault, Discipline and Punish, 170.

62 SLS/HLG 331.8335F, CSHC, Park Hill Redevelopment (1960), 1.

63 Rose, Powers of Freedom, 149. See also Morris, R.N. and Mogey, J., The Sociology of Housing (London, 1965), 165Google Scholar.

64 Ling, A., ‘Satisfying human needs at the core’, in Tyrwhitt, J., Sert, J.L. and Rogers, E.N. (ed.), The Heart of the City: Towards the Humanisation of Urban Life (London, 1952), 94Google Scholar.

65 Foucault, ‘Questions of method’, 79.

66 Burns, New Towns for Old, 94.

67 Empson, M., ‘The housing manager's contribution to estate planning’, in Rowles, R.J. (ed.), Housing Management (London, 1959), 54Google Scholar.

68 Ericksen, Urban Behavior, 422–3.

69 Dahir, J., Communities for Better Living: Citizen Achievement in Organisation, Design and Development (New York, 1950), 40Google Scholar.

70 R. Banham, ‘Park Hill revisited: English public housing that broke the rules (but works anyway)’, Architecture Plus (May, 1974), 114.

71 ‘Housing: Park Hill and Hyde Park’, Architects’ Journal (21 Jul. 1965), 160.

72 Ibid.

73 SLS/HLG 331.8335G, Park Hill Survey, 1.

74 Department of the Environment (DoE), The Estate outside the Dwelling: Reactions of Residents to Aspects of Housing Layout (London, 1972), 4.

75 Ravetz, Council Housing and Culture, 158.

76 DoE, The Estate outside the Dwelling, 27.

77 SLS/HLG MP 4871M, ‘Appraisal of Park Hill redevelopment’, 283.

78 DoE, The Estate outside the Dwelling, 31.

79 Ibid., 61–2.

80 Gordon, ‘Governmental rationality’, 3.

81 Harvey, D., The Condition of Post-Modernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Social Change (Oxford, 1989), 35Google Scholar.

82 C. Jameson, ‘British architecture: thirty years wasted’, Sunday Times (6 Feb. 1977), 14; S. Bayley (ed.), ‘Housing in Britain, 1952–77’, Architectural Review (Jan. 1977), 421. A. Coleman's Utopia on Trial: Vision and Reality in Planned Housing (London, 1985) is perhaps the most comprehensive and vociferous example of this backlash against ‘planned’ estates.

83 Foucault, ‘Space, knowledge and power’, 248.

84 SLS/HLG 331.8335G, Park Hill Survey, i.

85 Joyce, P., The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City (London, 2003), 4Google Scholar.

86 Taken from a lecture entitled ‘The meshes of power’ (1976), quoted in S. Eden and J.W. Crampton (ed.), Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography (London, 2007), 6.

87 SLS/HLG MP 4871M, ‘Appraisal of Park Hill redevelopment’, 281; Glendinning and Muthesius, Tower Block, 260.

88 G. Burchell, ‘Peculiar interests: civil society and governing “the system of natural liberty”’, in Burchell, Gordon and Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect, 121.

89 From a lecture that Foucault gave at Collége de France, 5 Apr. 1978, quoted in Gordon, ‘Governmental rationality’, 20; Rose, Powers of Freedom, 87.

90 Foucault, ‘Space, knowledge and power’, 247.