Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:15:51.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fountain of the Innocents and its place in the Paris cityscape, 1549–1788

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

DAVID GILKS
DAVID GILKS*
Affiliation:
School of History, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses how the Fountain of the Innocents appeared and also how it was used and perceived as part of the Paris cityscape. In the 1780s, the plan to transform the Holy Innocents’ Cemetery into a market cast doubt on the Fountain's future; earlier perceptions now shaped discussions over reusing it as part of the transformed quarter. The article documents how the Fountain was dismantled in 1787 and re-created the following year according to a new design, explaining why it was created in this form. Finally, the article considers what contemporary reactions to the remade Fountain reveal about attitudes toward the authenticity of urban monuments before the establishment of heritage institutions and societies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 49 - 73
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Calvino, I., Invisible Cities, trans. W. Weaver (London, 1974), 106–7Google Scholar.

2 Van Damme, S., Métropoles de papier. Naissance de l'archéologie urbaine à Paris et à Londres (XVIIe–XXe siècle) (Paris, 2012), 12–15 Google Scholar, 94.

3 Latour, B. and Hermant, E., Paris ville invisible (Paris, 1998)Google Scholar, Plan 52; Lefebvre, H., The Production of Space, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith (Oxford, 1991), 33 Google Scholar.

4 Malinowski, B., Collected Works, vol. X, ed. Firth, R. (London, 1935), 20 Google Scholar.

5 Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y., ‘The cultural biography of objects’, World Archaeology, 31 (1999), 169–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Rossi, A., The Architecture of the City, trans. D. Ghirado and J. Ockman (Cambridge, MA, 1984), 46–8Google Scholar.

7 On their collaboration, see Leproux, G., ‘Histoire de Paris’, Annuaire de l'École pratique des hautes études, section des sciences historiques et philologiques, 143 (2012), 229–34Google Scholar; idem, ‘Jean Goujon et la sculpture funéraire’, in Zerner, H. and Bayard, M. (eds.), Renaissance en France, Renaissance française? (Paris, 2009), 117–29Google Scholar.

8 On the area, see Fleury, M. and Leproux, G. (eds.), Les Saints-Innocents (Paris, 1990)Google Scholar. For simple maps showing the Fountain's locations and surroundings between 1550 and 1877, see https://repository.library.brown.edu/studio/item/bdr:86322/, accessed 30 Jul. 2016.

9 Macfarlane, I., The Entry of Henri II into Paris, 16 June 1549 (New York, 1982)Google Scholar; Usher, P., Epic Arts in the French Renaissance (Oxford, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 15, 121; Beguin, S., ‘Quelques remarques sur les artistes de l'entrée de Henri II’, in Oursel, H. and Fritsch, J. (eds.), Henri II et les arts (Paris, 2003), 135–54Google Scholar.

10 Guerin, P. (ed.), Registres des deliberations du bureau de la ville de Paris, vol. III (Paris, 1886), 175 Google Scholar.

11 It followed recent efforts to improve the flow of water from Belleville to the earlier fountain on the same site – see Archives nationales, France (AN), K 955, no. 11, and Q1 1109, doss. ‘Fontaines publiques’, ordinances dated 6 Aug. 1538 and 25 Sep. 1540. On the wider context, see M. Baudouin-Matuszek, ‘Le domaine royale à Paris’, in Oursel and Fritsch (eds.), Henri II et les arts, 105; AN, Q1 1109 and K 955, no. 11; Lisle, P. Cebron de and Smith, P., ‘Paris en quête d'eau’, in Massounie, D. et al. (eds.), Paris et ses fontaines: de la Renaissance à nos jours (Paris, 1995), 14 Google Scholar.

12 Guerin (ed.), Registres, vol. III, 164–71; Chartrou, J., Les entrées solennelles et triomphales à la Renaissance (1484–1551) (Paris, 1928), 99Google Scholar; ‘Rapport présenté par Charles, M. Sellier sur l'enquête ordonnée par Colbert en 1678’, in Procès-verbal de la Commission municipale du vieux Paris, 3 (1898), 16 Google Scholar.

13 This description selectively borrows from Colombier, P., Jean Goujon (Paris, 1949), 56–69 Google Scholar; Miller, N., ‘The form and meaning of the Fontaine des Innocents’, Art Bulletin, 50 (1968), 270–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; J. Thirion, ‘La Fontaine des Nymphes’, in Fleury and Leproux (eds.), Les Saints-Innocents, 121–43; D. Rabreau, ‘Sculpture et iconographie’, in Massounie et al. (eds.), Paris et ses fontaines, 151–2; Zerner, H., Renaissance Art in France. The Invention of Classicism (Paris, 2003)Google Scholar, 174, 187, 190–1, 434–5.

14 Macfarlane, The Entry of Henri II, 32–5.

15 Guerin (ed.), Registres, vol. III, 164–71; S. Serlio, Sebastiano Serlio on Architecture, trans. V. Hart and P. Hicks, vol. II (New Haven, 2001), xxxvii, 270.

16 The concept of ‘afterlife’ comes from Benjamin, W., ‘The task of the translator’, in Bullock, M. and Jennings, M. (eds.), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, vol. I: 1913–1926 (Cambridge, MA, 1996), 256 Google Scholar. This section nuances E. Pommier, ‘Une intervention de Quatremère de Quincy’, in Fleury and Leproux (eds.), Les Saints-Innocents, 145–9.

17 Chesne, A. du, Les antiqvitez et recherches des villes, casteavx, et places plus remarquables de toute la France (Paris, 1609)Google Scholar, part 2, 796; Breul, J. Du, Le theatre des antiquités de Paris (Paris, 1612)Google Scholar, book 3, 790; Bouquet, S., Bref et sommaire recueil de ce qui a este'faict, & de l'ordre tenuë a'la ioyeuse & triumphante entree de tres-puissant, tres-magnanime & tres-chrestien Prince Charles IX (Paris, 1572), 30 Google Scholar.

18 Corrozet, G., Antiquitez, croniques et singularitez de Paris (Paris, 1581), 264 Google Scholar.

19 Zerner, Renaissance Art, 182.

20 Silvestre, I., Liure de diuerses perspectiues et paisages faits sur le naturel (Paris, 1650)Google Scholar, title page.

21 Nationalmuseum, Stockholm: NMH CC2217.

22 The Fountain was used for the entry of 1571 but merely provided water for a nearby sculpture group – Bouquet, Bref et sommaire recueil, 30.

23 AN, Q1 1109, doss. ‘Fontaines publiques’, ordinances dated 1 Oct. and 29 Oct. 1622.

24 d'Aviler, A., Cours d'architecture qui comprend les ordres de Vignole (Paris, 1700), 80Google Scholar; Brice, G., Nouvelle description de la ville de Paris, vol. I (Paris, 1725), 492 Google Scholar; Haskell, F. and Penny, N., Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500–1900 (New Haven, 1981)Google Scholar, 40, 56; Tesson, M., ‘Matériaux pour servir a l’établissement du casier archéologique et artistique’, in Procès-verbaux de la Commission municipale du vieux Paris (Paris, 1922), 58 Google Scholar.

25 Chantelou, P. Fréart de, Journal du voyage du cavalier Bernin en France, ed. Lalanne, L. (Paris, 1885), 42 Google Scholar. Bernini's purported description was, in fact, an exaggeration of Fréart's words, which were then misattributed to the Italian by Brice, G., Description nouvelle de ce qu'il y a de plus remarquable dans la ville de Paris, vol. I (Paris, 1685), 82 Google Scholar; Saugrain, N., Les curiositez de Paris (Paris, 1716), 29 Google Scholar, and others. On guidebooks, see Chabaud, G. et al. (eds.), Les guides imprimés du XVIe au XXe siècle (Paris, 2000), 59–80 Google Scholar.

26 This started with Félibien, A., Entretiens sur les vies et sur les ouvrages des plus excellens peintres anciens et modernes (Paris, 1674), 64 Google Scholar; Le Maire, Paris ancien et nouveau, vol. II (Paris, 1685), 431; Monier, P., Histoire des arts qui ont rapport au dessin (Paris, 1698), 314 Google Scholar.

27 Morery, L., Le grand dictionnaire historique, vol. IV (Paris, 1707), 154 Google Scholar; Lister, M., A Journey to Paris in the Year 1698 (London, 1699), 56 Google Scholar.

28 Pérelle, G., Vues des belles maisons de France (Paris, 1693)Google Scholar; J. Scotin print in Brice, Nouvelle description (1725 edn) – Scotin's original drawing is in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, département Estampes et photographie.

29 Voltaire, Le temple du gout [1731], in Cronk, N. (ed.), The Complete Works of Voltaire, vol. IX (Oxford, 1999), 169 Google Scholar.

30 AN, Q1 1182: Beausire's report of 30 Aug. 1696 detailing work undertaken; various lease contracts dated 23 Jan. 1715, 2 Aug. 1743 and 25 Jun. 1746.

31 AN, K1025, doss. 6; Blondel, J., Architecture françoise, vol. III (Paris, 1754)Google Scholar, plate 308; Garrioch, D., The Making of Revolutionary Paris (Los Angeles, 2002), 221 Google Scholar; Roche, D., A history of everyday things (Cambridge, 2000), 154 Google Scholar; Carbonnier, Y., Maisons parisiennes des Lumières (Paris, 2012), 439 Google Scholar.

32 Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF), Joly de Fleury papers, Assemblies de police, 1321, 26–9.

33 Garrioch, The Making of Revolutionary Paris, 237–8.

34 I. Dérens, ‘Un siècle d’édiles parisiens: Jean Beausire et sa lignée’, in Massounie et al. (eds.), Paris et ses fontaines, 132–42; AN, AFII 48, no. 167, letters from Bailly to de Goudio dated 24 Sep. and 13 Oct. 1791.

35 Chesne, Les antiqvitez, book 3, 790; Breul, Le théâtre des antiquitez, 1071; Malingre, C., Les antiquites de la ville de Paris (Paris, 1640)Google Scholar, book 3, 797; Le Maire, Paris ancien et nouveau, vol. II, 431–7.

36 Brice, G., Description nouvelle de la ville de Paris, vol. I (Paris, 1698), 235 Google Scholar; Brice, Nouvelle description (1725 edn), 493; Saugrain, Les curiositez, 29–30.

37 AN, K1025, doss. 6.

38 The shift is obscured by commentaries that copied descriptions from the previous period of its afterlife, such as Rouge, G. Le, Les curiositez de Paris, vol. I (Paris, 1742), 230 Google Scholar; d'Argenville, A. Dézallier, Voyage pittoresque de Paris (Paris, 1749), 121–2Google Scholar; and Voyage pittoresque de Paris (Paris, 1757), 156; la Force, J. Piganiol de, Description historique de la ville de Paris et de ses environs, vol. III (Paris, 1765), 306–8Google Scholar; Almanach parisien (Paris, 1772), 70–1; Nugent, Grand Tour, vol. IV (London, 1778), 79–80; Thiery, L., Guides des amateurs, vol. I (Paris, 1787), 78 Google Scholar; Anon., Almanach Parisien (Paris, 1789), 174.

39 This started in the 1720s (for instance in Brice, Nouvelle description, 492) and was widely accepted by the 1740s.

40 On Goujon's sculptures, see Diderot, D., ‘Salon de 1767’, Oeuvres, vol. IV (Paris, 1996), 530 Google Scholar; Barry, J., The Works of James Barry, vol. I (London, 1809), 33 Google Scholar; Massounie, D., Les monuments de l'eau: aqueducs, châteaux d'eau et fontaines dans la France urbaine, du règne de Louis XIV à la Révolution (Paris, 2009), 116 Google Scholar; West, A., From Pigalle to Préault: neoclassicism and the sublime in French sculpture, 1760–1840 (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar, ch. 6; Poulet, A. et al. (eds.), Clodion 1738–1814 (Paris, 1992), 19 Google Scholar. On Goujon as a national hero equal to Italian masters, see Lacombe, J., Dictionnaire portative des beaux-arts (Paris, 1759), 285 Google Scholar; Milizia, F., Le vite de piu celebri architetti d'ogni nazione e d'ogni tempo (Rome, 1768), 256 Google Scholar; Blondel, F., Homme du monde éclaire par les arts, vol. II (Paris, 1774), 232 Google Scholar; Bonafous, L. de, Dictionnaire des artistes ou notice historique et raisonnee des architectes, vol. I (Paris, 1776), 651 Google Scholar; d'Argenville, A. Dezallier, Vies des fameux architectes depuis la renaissance des arts, vol. I (Paris, 1787)Google Scholar, vi.

41 J. Barrier, ‘Fontaines et embellissements de la capitale’, in Massounie et al. (eds.), Paris et ses fontaines, 125–30; Massounie, Les monuments, 47.

42 Laugier, M., Essai sur l'architecture (Paris, 1753), 190 Google Scholar.

43 Blondel, Architecture françoise, vol. III, 7–9, 226; Journal des Savants (Jan. 1755), 27–9; ‘P.’, ‘Fontaines’, in Diderot, D. and d'Alembert, M. (eds.), Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonne des sciences, des arts et des metiers, vol. VII (Paris, 1757), 96 Google Scholar; Dezallier d'Argenville, Vies, 470.

44 See eighteenth-century references in nn. 40 and 43.

45 See, for instance, Bachaumont, L., Essai sur la peinture, la sculpture et l'architecture (Paris, 1751), 62–3Google Scholar; Mairobert, M. Pidansat de and d'Angerville, M. et al. (eds.), Mémoires secrets pour servir à l'histoire de la République des lettres en France depuis 1762 jusqu'à nos jours, vol. XXXII (London, 1788)Google Scholar, entry 20 Jun. 1786, 119.

46 Reproduced and discussed in Crow, T., Painters and Public Life in Eighteenth-Century Paris (New Haven, 1985), 9 Google Scholar. Caylus has been attributed with its composition – Gazette des beaux-arts, 4 (1857), 50; Watelet engraved the first version around 1753.

47 Blondel, Architecture françoise, vol. III, 9.

48 A. Quatremère de Quincy, ‘Aux auteurs du journal’, Journal de Paris, 42, 11 Feb. 1787, 181.

49 Blondel, Architecture françoise, vol. III, 7–9, 226; idem, L'homme du monde eclaire par les arts, vol. II (Paris, 1774), 232–3; la Grave, G. Poncet de, Projet des Embellissments de la Ville et Faubourgs de Paris, vol. I (Paris, 1756), 190–1Google Scholar; Papayanis, N., Planning Paris before Haussmann (London, 2004), 22–3Google Scholar, 28.

50 For earlier examples of these demands, see, for instance, Voltaire, ‘Des embellissements de Paris’ [1749], in Oeuvres de Voltaire, vol. XXIX (Paris, 1830), 101; Saint-Yenne, É. La Font de, L'Ombre du grand Colbert (Paris, 1752), 336–7Google Scholar; Gresset, ‘Epitre a monsieur de Tournehem’ in Bachaumont, L. de, Essai sur la peinture, la sculpture, et l'architecture (1752 edn), 127–33Google Scholar.

51 Archives de Paris (AP), D1Z, box 59, ‘Innocents (Square de)’, 139, Arrêt du Conseil, 9 Nov. 1785; Thiery, Guide des amateurs, vol. I (1787 edn), 479; Brockliss, L. and Jones, C., The Medical World of Early Modern France (Oxford, 1997), 753 Google Scholar.

52 AN, L656, no. 53, Z10 222, Z1J 1151; Thouret, J., Rapport sur les exhumations du cimetière et de l'église des Saints-Innocents (Paris, 1789)Google Scholar; Thury, L. Hericart de, Description des catacombs de Paris (Paris, 1815), 173–5Google Scholar.

53 De Mairobert and d'Angerville et al. (eds.), Mémoires secrets, vol. XXXII, entry 20 Jun. 1786, 119–20; Quatremère, ‘Aux auteurs du journal’, 181.

54 Quatremère, ‘Aux auteurs du journal’, 181–3.

55 Journal de Paris, 42, 11 Feb. 1787, 183; A. Pajou, ‘Aux auteurs du journal’, Journal de Paris, 50, 19 Feb. 1787, 217–18.

56 ‘Avis sur la fontaine des innocents’, 9 Jul. 1787, in Lasteyrie, F. de, ‘Document inédit sur la Fontaine des Innocents’, Correspondence litteraire, 12 (1860), 272–5Google Scholar; Quincy, A. Quatremère de, ‘Goujon’, Encyclopédie méthodique: architecture, vol. II (Paris, 1820), 475–6Google Scholar. Six was first credited with this proposal in Landon, C. (ed.), Annales du Musée et de l’École moderne des beaux-arts, vol. I (Paris, 1803), 110–12Google Scholar.

57 Rampelberg, R., Le ministre de la maison du roi, 1783–88: Baron de Breteuil (Paris, 1975), 239–45Google Scholar; Poyet, ‘Aux mêmes’, Journal de Paris, 262, 9 Sep. 1809, 1868.

58 Chastel, A. et al., ‘Les Halles de Paris’, Le Bulletin monumentale, 127 (1967), 76 Google Scholar.

59 ‘Avis sur la fontaine des innocents’, 272–5.

60 Monin, H. (ed.), L'état de Paris en 1789 (Paris, 1889), 366 Google Scholar; AN, F13 1013, doss. 34, letter from De Crosne to Poyet headed ‘Translation de la fontaine des innocents’, copy dated 25 Jun. 1793 from the original of 18 Aug. 1787.

61 AN, Z1H 336A, details of the meeting of the Bureau de la ville de Paris, dated 27 Sep. 1787; Stein, H., Augustin Pajou (Paris, 1912), 108 Google Scholar; Millart and C. Pécoul, ‘Procès-verbal du déplacement de la Fontaine des Innocents’ – cited Schneider, R., Quatremère de Quincy et son intervention dans les arts (1788–1830) (Paris, 1910), 26–7Google Scholar.

62 Dulaire, J., Histoire physique, civile, et morale de Paris, vol. V (Paris, 1821), 483 Google Scholar; AN, F13 1013, doss. 34. Poyet letter dated 5 Jun. year 2; AN, F13 212, doss. ‘Fontaine des Innocents 1787’; AN, F17 1265 and F21*2470, no. 60, 1920, containing multiple documents dated 1792–96 concerning disputes over ornaments; Bibliothèque historique de la ville de Paris (BHVP), NA, MS 182, fol. 169, Belanger letter to prefect of the Seine dated 26 Oct. 1806.

63 AN, O1 1919/3, 245, Pajou letter to d'Angiviller dated 11 Oct. 1787; AN, O1 1180, 568, d'Angiviller letter to Pajou dated 14 Nov. 1787.

64 Batissier, L. and Dulaire, J., Histoire de Paris et de ses monuments, par Dulaure. Nouvelle édition, refondue et complétée jusqu'à nos jours (Paris, n.d. [1846]), 284 Google Scholar; AN, O1 499, fols. 181, 192, 212, 319; AP, D1 Z59, doss. ‘Innocents, square de’, no. 141.

65 BHVP, MS 1212, fol. 15, Pajou letter to Bailly dated 15 Nov. 1789; Stein, Pajou, 371–83. The commission had two phases, contrary to Pajou's version of events when he demanded payment.

66 AN, O1 499, fols. 212 (Breteuil to Poyet, 11 Apr. 188), 320 (Breteul to Thiroux de Crosne, 7 Jun. 1788).

67 Tesson, ‘Matériaux’, 59; F. and Lazare, L., Dictionnaire administratif et historique des rues et monuments de Paris (Paris, [1855] 1994), 433 Google Scholar; P. Grégoire, Fontaine des Innocents (1788), BnF, département Estampes et photographie; AP, D12 59.

68 BHVP, MS 1212, fol. 15; AN, F13 212.

69 Tesson, ‘Matériaux’, 59.

70 Poyet's scheme was represented in a pen and ink drawing (‘Vue perspective de la fontaine des innocents, présentée à Monsieur de Villedeuil’ – Private collection, 36 × 51.5cm) that later appeared as an engraving in Borde, J. La et al. (eds.), Voyage pittoresque de la France, vol. X, livraison 56 (Paris, 1792)Google Scholar, no. 84. Stalls were only erected in 1811 and to a different design – AN, F13 1162, F13 942, no. 52; AP, 6AZ8, doss. 422. From 1789 to 1811, large umbrellas – shown in many visual representations (Figure 4) – provided some shelter for market sellers and their produce.

71 Journal de Paris, 50, 19 Feb. 1787, 217–18.

72 AN, H748 231, no. 18, H1023 17; Michel, P., ‘La politique d'acquisition des Batiments du Roi pour les collections royales dans la seconde moitie du XVIIIe siècle: modalities, choix et portee’, in Favreau, M. et al. (eds.), De l'usage de l'art en politique (Rennes, 2009), 45–61 Google Scholar.

73 G. Joudiou, ‘Le marché et le square des Innocents’, in Fleury and Leproux (eds.), Les Saints-Innocents, 163–75; Tesson, ‘Matériaux’, 59; Péridier, J., La commune et les artistes: Pottier, Courbet, Vallès, J.-B. Clément (Paris, 1980), 66 Google Scholar.

74 This same design – supplemented with the flagpole added to the Fountain in 1791 – reappeared in Sobre, Le marché des innocents vu de la Maison Batave (1804) – Musée Carnavalet.

75 These are calculated using the height – 2.29m – of the standing nymphs.

76 Nineteenth-century accounts named Mézières, Lhuillier and Daujon without specifying their division of labour, but this can be surmised from payment disputes and information about their areas of expertise. AN, F13 212, F13 1013; Negre, V., L'ornement en série (Paris, 2006), 87, 94–5Google Scholar, 133; Szambien, W., Le Musée d'architecture (Paris, 1988), 23, 44–5Google Scholar.

77 Thirion, ‘La Fontaine des Nymphes’, 141–2; Stein, Pajou, 234–9; J. Draper and G. Sherf, Augustin Pajou, Royal Sculptor (New York, 1998), 80–2.

78 Emeric-David, T., Recherches sur l'art statuaire (Paris, [1805] 1863), 299–302 Google Scholar, 308; Quincy, A. Quatremère de, Letters to Miranda and Canova on the Abduction of Antiquities from Rome and Athens, trans. C. Miller and D. Gilks (Los Angeles, 2012), 156 Google Scholar; Planche, G., Portraits d'artistes, vol. I (Paris, 1853), 146–72Google Scholar, 178.

79 AN, O1 499, fols. 181–2, 192, 212, 319–20, F13 212.

80 La Borde et al. (eds.), Voyage pittoresque, vol. X, livraison 56, 2–3; Pujoulx, J., Paris a la fin du XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1801), 28 Google Scholar; Lenoir, A., Histoire des arts en France, prouvée par les monuments (Paris, 1811), 290 Google Scholar; Landon (ed.), Annales, 91–3, 111–12; Landon, C. and Legrand, J., Description de Paris, vol. II (Paris, 1809), 71–3Google Scholar; Victoire, J. de Saint, Tableau historique et pittoresque de Paris, vol. II (Paris, 1809), 256 Google Scholar.

81 Faroult, G., Hubert Robert (1733–1808). Un peintre visionnaire (Paris, 2016), 386–7Google Scholar; AN, AFIII, 48, no. 167, F21*2470, doss. 211, 76–7, and doss. 372, 142, F21*2471, doss. 167, 150–1, F14 2152, F14 2180/2, F21*2473, 282–7.

82 Anon., Le Voyageur (Paris, 1797), 130; Saint Victoire, Tableau historique, vol. II, 256; Pujoulx, Paris, 28; Landon (ed.), Annales, 91–3.

83 Journal de Paris, 229, 17 Aug. 1809, 1698; L. de Belan, ‘Aux rédacteurs’, Journal de Paris, 234, 23 Aug. 1809, 1736; AP, VO3/655 and 4AZ 6, no. 309; Joudiou, ‘Le marché’, 164, 169.

84 Poyet, ‘Aux rédacteurs’, Journal de Paris, 262, 9 Sep. 1809, 1868.

85 Diezmann, A., Malerische Wanderungen durch Paris oder Schilderungen der denkwürdigsten (Leipzig, 1816), 204–6Google Scholar; Kolloff, E., Paris: Reisehandbuch (Leipzig, 1849), 152 Google Scholar; Quatremère, ‘Goujon’, 476; Quincy, A. Quatremère de, ‘Goujon’, in Dictionnaire historique d'architecture, vol. I (Paris, 1832), 679Google Scholar; Planche, Portraits d'artistes, vol. I (Paris, 1853), 170.

86 AN, F21*2542/12, doss. 52; Procès-verbaux. Commission municipale du vieux Paris (Paris, 1918), 84; Baltard, V., Agrandissement et construction des halles centrales d'approvisionnement. Rapport fait au Conseil municipal (Paris, 1845), 74 Google Scholar.

87 C. Daly, Revue generale de l'architecture et des travaux publics, 18 (1860), 155; Lepine, P. et al., Gabriel Davioud, architecte 1824–1881 (Paris, 1981), 41Google Scholar; Moniteur de la mode, 1 (1860), 203; Correspondant, 61 (1863), 893; Baedeker, K., Paris and its Environs (Leipzig, 1878), 180 Google Scholar; Stanford, E., Stanford's Paris Guide (London, 1862), 113–14Google Scholar; Procès-verbaux. Commission de vieux Paris (Paris, 1901), 136.

88 Bell, D., The Cult of the Nation in France. Inventing Nationalism, 1680–1800 (Cambridge, MA, 2003)Google Scholar.

89 Journal de Paris, 14 Mar. 1787.

90 Potofosky, A., ‘Recycling the city: Paris, 1760s–1800’, in Fennetaux, A. et al., The Afterlife of Used Things: Recycling in the Long Eighteenth Century (New York, 2015), 71–2Google Scholar.

91 Karmon, D., The Ruins of the Eternal City: Antiquity and Preservation in Renaissance Rome (Oxford, 2011), 6–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Preserving antiquity in a Protestant city: the Maison Carrée in sixteenth-century Nimes’, in Raguin, V. Chieffo (ed.), Art, Piety, and Destruction in European Religion, 1500–1700 (Farnham, 2010), 113–35Google Scholar.

92 Podany, G., ‘Lessons from the past’, in Grossman, J. Burnett et al. (eds.), History of Restoration of Ancient Stone Sculptures (Los Angeles, 2003), 17 Google Scholar.

93 AN, L656, doss. 53, archbishop of Paris orders the demolition of the Church of the Holy Innocents, 31 Nov. 1786.