Article contents
Family, lineage and dynasty in the late medieval city: re-thinking the English evidence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2019
Abstract
Ever since the publication in 1948 of Sylvia Thrupp's seminal book, The Merchant Class of Medieval London, successive generations of historians of English cities have advanced two central claims about the distinctiveness of the English urban landscape. First, ‘urban dynasties’ in late medieval England very rarely survived beyond two or three generations. Secondly, their weakness was a ‘peculiarly English’ phenomenon and a fundamental difference between English and continental towns. The article explores the historiographical significance of this thesis, the strength of which rests upon its explanatory role within a much wider narrative of English exceptionalism. It argues that the thesis has implications for the study of cities in continental Europe and, finally, it suggests that the English evidence might reveal a much more interesting picture of elite reproduction, when we think more critically and comparatively about how urban elites conceptualized ‘lineage’.
- Type
- Survey and Speculation
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
Footnotes
Caroline Barron, Frederik Buylaert, Marta Gravela, Jelle Haemers and Patrick Lantschner generously commented on earlier drafts of the article and gave advice on sources. I would also like to thank Marcus Meer for bibliographical assistance and the editor and anonymous reader for many helpful suggestions.
References
1 For the different editions, see Catalogue of Books Printed in the XVth Century now in the British Library, Part 11: England, ed. Hellinga, L. (’t Goy-Houten, 2007), 133–4, 150–1Google Scholar.
2 For what follows, see The Prologues and Epilogues of William Caxton, ed. Crotch, W.J.B. (Early English Text Society, original series, 176, 1929), 76–8Google Scholar.
3 Taylor, A., ‘Authors, scribes, patrons and books’, in Wogan-Browne, J. et al. (eds.), The Idea of the Vernacular: An Anthology of Middle English Literary Theory, 1280–1520 (Exeter, 1999), 364–5Google Scholar.
4 Harry, D., ‘William Caxton and commemorative culture in fifteenth-century England’, in Clark, L. (ed.), Exploring the Evidence: Commemoration, Administration and the Economy (Woodbridge, 2014), 63–80Google Scholar.
5 Sutton, A.F., ‘William Caxton, king's printer c. 1480–85: a plea for history and chronology in a merchant's career’, in Barron, C.M. and Sutton, A.F. (eds.), The Medieval Merchant (Donington, 2014), 259–83Google Scholar. On Caxton's stay in the Low Countries, where he had his first printing workshop, see Adam, R., ‘Printing books in Bruges in the fifteenth century’, in Hauwaerts, E. et al. (eds.), Colard Mansion: Incunabula, Prints and Manuscripts in Medieval Bruges (Ghent, 2018), 53–61Google Scholar.
6 Goody, J., The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe (Cambridge, 1983), 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Thrupp, S.L., The Merchant Class of Medieval London [1300–1500] (Chicago, 1948), ch. 5, esp. 191–206Google Scholar.
8 Hoskins, W.G., ‘English provincial towns in the early 16th century’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6 (1956), 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The quotation is at p. 8.
9 Hammer, C.I., ‘The Oxford town council in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Journal of British Studies, 18 (1978), 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Fleming, P., ‘Telling tales of oligarchy in the late medieval town’, in Hicks, M. (ed.), Revolution and Consumption in Late Medieval England (Woodbridge, 2001), 178Google Scholar.
11 Hoskins, ‘English provincial towns’, 19.
12 Platt, C., The English Medieval Town (London, 1976), 98–9Google Scholar.
13 Platt, C., Medieval Southampton: The Port and Trading Community, A.D. 1000–1600 (London, 1973), chs. 5–6Google Scholar; Jones, S. Rees, York: The Making of a City, 1068–1530 (Oxford, 2013), 186–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Williams, G.A., Medieval London: From Commune to Capital (London, 1963), 32–3, 50–75, 310–11Google Scholar.
14 Reynolds, S., Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe 900–1300, 2nd edn (Oxford, 1997), 209–10Google Scholar. See also McEwan, J., ‘The aldermen of London, c. 1200–80: Alfred Beaven revisited’, Transactions of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society, 62 (2017), 186–7Google Scholar.
15 Thrupp, Merchant Class, 228.
16 Platt, English Medieval Town, 102.
17 Cowan, A., ‘Urban elites in early modern Europe: an endangered species?’, Historical Research, 64 (1991), 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Castelnuovo, G., Être noble dans la cité. Les noblesses italiennes en quête d'identité (XIIIe–XVe siècle) (Paris, 2014), part 1Google Scholar; Lansing, C., The Florentine Magnates: Lineage and Faction in a Medieval Commune (Princeton, 1991)Google Scholar.
19 Hanawalt, B.A., Growing up in Medieval London: The Experience of Childhood in History (Oxford, 1993), 107Google Scholar; Hanawalt, B.A., The Wealth of Wives: Women, Law, and Economy in Late Medieval London (Oxford, 2007), 209Google Scholar.
20 Dyer, A.D., The City of Worcester in the Sixteenth Century (Leicester, 1973), 180–1, 186Google Scholar.
21 Nightingale, P., ‘Knights and merchants: trade, politics and the gentry in late medieval England’, Past and Present, 169 (2000), 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Carocci, S., ‘Social mobility and the Middle Ages’, Continuity and Change, 26 (2011), 371–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Prologues and Epilogues of William Caxton, 77.
24 Horrox, R., ‘The urban gentry in the fifteenth century’, in Thomson, J.A.F. (ed.), Towns and Townspeople in the Fifteenth Century (Gloucester, 1988), 22–44Google Scholar.
25 Thrupp, Merchant Class, ch. 5; Shaw, D.G., The Creation of a Community: The City of Wells in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1993), 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 Heers, J., Family Clans in the Middle Ages: A Study of Political and Social Structures in Urban Areas (Amsterdam, 1977), 6, 248Google Scholar.
27 Kermode, J., Medieval Merchants: York, Beverley and Hull in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1998), 308, 319Google Scholar.
28 Nicholas, D., Urban Europe 1100–1700 (Basingstoke, 2003), 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
29 For a recent call to engage once more with ‘class’, see Fynn-Paul, J., ‘Let's talk about class: towards an institutionalist typology of class relations in the cities of pre-modern Europe (c. 1200–c. 1800)’, Urban History, 41 (2014), 582–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Hilton, R., ‘Status and class in the medieval town’, in Slater, T.R. and Rosser, G. (eds.), The Church in the Medieval Town (Aldershot, 1998), 12–13Google Scholar.
31 Maschke, E., ‘Die Schichtung der mittelalterlichen Stadtbevölkerung als Problem der Forschung’, originally published in 1973 and reprinted in Maschke, E. (ed.), Städte und Menschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Stadt, der Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 1959–1977 (Wiesbaden, 1980), 162–6Google Scholar.
32 Monnet, P., ‘Zwischen Reproduktion und Repräsentation. Formierungsprozesse von Eliten in westeuropäischen Städten des Spätmittelalters: Terminologie, Typologie, Dynamik’, in Gruber, E. et al. (eds.), Städte im lateinischen Westen und im griechischen Osten zwischen Spätantike und Früher Neuzeit (Vienna, 2016), 177, 179, 180Google Scholar.
33 For one attempt, see C.E. Carpenter, ‘The formation of urban élites: civic officials in late-medieval York 1476–1525’, University of York D.Phil. thesis, 2000. Historians of German cities have pursued this agenda much more rigorously: Studt, B., ‘Erinnerung und Identität. Die Repräsentation städtischer Eliten in spätmittelalterlichen Haus- und Familienbüchern’, in Studt, B. (ed.), Haus- und Familienbücher in der Städtischen Gesellschaft des Spätmittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit (Cologne, 2007), 1–31Google Scholar.
34 Padgett, J.F., ‘Open elite? Social mobility, marriage, and family in Florence, 1282–1494’, Renaissance Quarterly, 63 (2010), 380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
35 Teuscher, S., ‘Politics of kinship in the city of Bern at the end of the Middle Ages’, in Sabean, D.W. et al. (eds.), Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-Term Development (1300–1900) (New York, 2007), 76Google Scholar.
36 Barron, C., ‘Chivalry, pageantry and merchant culture in medieval London’, in Coss, P. and Keen, M. (eds.), Heraldry, Pageantry and Social Display in Medieval England (Woodbridge, 2002), 219–41Google Scholar.
37 Carpenter, C., Locality and Polity: A Study of Warwickshire Landed Society, 1401–1499 (Cambridge, 1992), 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
38 Ibid., ch. 7.
39 Ibid., 252, 255–6; Carpenter, C., ‘The fifteenth-century English gentry and their estates’, in Jones, M. (ed.), Gentry and Lesser Nobility in Late Medieval Europe (Gloucester, 1986), 54Google Scholar. For the legal devices, see Payling, S.J., ‘Social mobility, demographic change, and landed society in late medieval England’, Economic History Review, new series, 45 (1992), 52–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
40 Carpenter, ‘Fifteenth-century English gentry’, 55.
41 Carpenter, Locality and Polity, 257.
42 Ibid., 253 n. 40.
43 These extracts from the will are taken from Richmond, C., ‘The Pastons revisited: marriage and the family in fifteenth-century England’, Historical Research, 58 (1985), 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 The quotation is from ibid.
45 Thrupp, Merchant Class, 339.
46 Ibid., 362.
47 For ‘legitim’, see Kermode, Medieval Merchants, 293.
48 Ibid., 303, 308. See also Dyer, City of Worcester, 180.
49 The National Archives (TNA), PROB 11/11/414.
50 For these examples, see Kermode, Medieval Merchants, 79, 307.
51 Maurel, C., ‘Un artifice contre l'extinction des familles? La substitution de nom et d'armes à Marseille (fin XIVe siècle – fin XVIe siècle)’, Médiévales, 19 (1990), 29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
52 Duindam, J., Dynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800 (Cambridge, 2015)Google Scholar.
53 Note here the distinction between ‘dynastic lineages’ and ‘patrilineal descent groups’ in Lansing, Florentine Magnates, 33–4, 37.
54 Padgett, ‘Open elite?’, 367.
55 Platt, English Medieval Town, 98.
56 Thrupp's specific interest was in the direct male line: Merchant Class, 199–200.
57 Gottfried, R.S., Bury St. Edmunds and the Urban Crisis: 1290–1539 (Princeton, 1982), 158Google Scholar.
58 Kermode, Medieval Merchants, 78–9.
59 Ibid., 72.
60 See also Cowan, ‘Urban elites’, 134 n. 57.
61 Dumolyn, J., ‘Later medieval and early modern urban elites: social categories and social dynamics’, in Asenjo-González, M. (ed.), Urban Elites and Aristocratic Behaviour in the Spanish Kingdoms at the End of the Middle Ages (Turnhout, 2013), 4–5Google Scholar.
62 Isenmann, E., Die deutsche Stadt im Mittelalter 1150–1550. Stadtgestalt, Recht, Verfassung, Stadtregiment, Kirche, Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft, 2nd rev. edn (Cologne, 2014), 750–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Zotz, T., ‘La représentation de la noblesse urbaine en Allemagne médiévale: les tournois et les premiers livres de famille’, in Petitfrère, C. (ed.), Construction, reproduction et représentation des patriciats urbains de l'antiquité au XXe siècle (Tours, 2013), 431–2Google Scholar.
63 Liddy, C.D., ‘“Sir ye be not kyng”: citizenship and speech in late medieval and early modern England’, Historical Journal, 60 (2017), 571–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
64 Hibbert, A.B., ‘The origins of the medieval town patriciate’, Past and Present, 3 (1953), 15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
65 For Flanders and the southern Low Countries, see Boone, M., ‘Les traditions de rebellions urbaines dans les anciens Pays-Bas: construction d'une identité urbaine, gestation d'une culture politique’, in Boone, M. (ed.), À la recherche d'une modernité civique. La société urbaine des anciens Pays-Bas au bas Moyen Âge (Brussels, 2010), 63 and n. 17Google Scholar. For Florence, see Lansing, Florentine Magnates, ch. 1.
66 Mineo, E.I., ‘States, orders and social distinction’, in Gamberini, A. and Lazzarini, I. (eds.), The Italian Renaissance State (Cambridge, 2012), 323–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
67 For the 1297 serrata, see Rösch, G., ‘The serrata of the great council and Venetian society, 1286–1323’, in Martin, J. and Romano, D. (eds.), Venice Reconsidered: The History and Civilization of an Italian City-State, 1297–1797 (Baltimore, 2000), 67–88Google Scholar.
68 A view set out in Chevalier, B., Les bonnes villes de France (Paris, 1982), 66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and restated more recently in B. Chevalier, ‘Le pouvoir par le savoir: le renouvellement des élites urbaines en France au début de l’âge modern (1350–1550)’, in Petitfrère (ed.), Construction, reproduction et représentation, 73–81.
69 Crouzet-Pavan, E., ‘Les élites urbaines: aperçus problématiques (France, Angleterre, Italie)’, in Gauvard, C. (ed.), Les élites urbaines au Moyen Âge (Paris, 1997), 18Google Scholar.
70 Thrupp, Merchant Class, 102.
71 de Lincy, Le Roux and Tisserand, L.M. (eds.), Paris et ses historiens aux XIVe et XVe siècles, histoire générale de Paris (Paris, 1867), 417–18Google Scholar.
72 M. Boone, ‘Le pouvoir et la lecture des paysages urbains: Flandre-Italie, une histoire comparative est-elle possible?’, in Boone (ed.), À la recherche d'une modernité civique, 101.
73 For the etymology of Geschlechter, see Isenmann, Die deutsche Stadt, 760.
74 Surmann, U., ‘Vom städtischen Umgang mit Bildern. Die Bildprogramme des Kölner Rathauses’, in Kier, H. et al. (eds.), Köln: Der Ratsturm. Seine Geschichte und sein Figurenprogramm (Cologne, 1996), 172, 180Google Scholar.
75 Isenmann, Die deutsche Stadt, 767.
76 Zotz, ‘La représentation de la noblesse urbaine’, 432; Isenmann, Die deutsche Stadt, 753.
77 Cowan, ‘Urban elites’, 133.
78 Teuscher, ‘Politics of kinship’, 86.
79 The question echoes the title of Monnet, P., ‘Doit-on encore parler de patriciat dans les villes allemandes de la fin du Moyen Âge?’, Bulletin de la Mission Historique française en Allemagne, 32 (1996), 54–66Google Scholar.
80 Klapisch-Zuber, C., Retour à la cite. Les magnats de Florence, 1340–1440 (Paris, 2006)Google Scholar.
81 See e.g. Isenmann's point that Cologne's Geschlechter after the constitution of 1396 were no longer ‘a political-social class’, but ‘a hereditarily-defined social group’: Die deutsche Stadt, 762.
82 Buylaert, F. et al. , ‘City portrait, civic body, and commercial printing in sixteenth-century Ghent’, Renaissance Quarterly, 68 (2015), 803–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
83 Molho, A., Marriage Alliance in Late Medieval Florence (Cambridge, MA, 1994), ch. 6Google Scholar; Padgett, ‘Open elite?’, 401–3.
84 Schulz, K., ‘Geburt, Herkunft und Integrität. Zur Handwerksehre vom 13. bis 16. Jahrhundert’, in Harding, E. and Hecht, M. (eds.), Die Ahnenprobe in der Vormoderne. Selektion, Initiation, Representation (Münster, 2011), 160Google Scholar.
85 C. Petitfrère, ‘Introduction’, in Petitfrère (ed.), Construction, reproduction et représentation, 6.
86 D. Crouch, ‘The historian, lineage and heraldry 1050–1250’, in Coss and Keen (eds.), Heraldry, Pageantry and Social Display, 18–19.
87 Burckhardt, J., The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. Middlemore, S.G.C. (London, 1990)Google Scholar. Its impact on historians of the family in Italy is underlined in Kirshner, J., ‘Family and marriage: a socio-legal perspective’, in Najemy, J.M. (ed.), Italy in the Age of the Renaissance (Oxford, 2004), 82–102Google Scholar. Goldthwaite's, R.A. ideas are set out in Private Wealth in Renaissance Florence: A Study of Four Families (Princeton, 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar and ‘The Florentine palace as domestic architecture’, American Historical Review, 77 (1972), 977–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
88 Heers, Family Clans.
89 Lansing, Florentine Magnates.
90 Herlihy, D. and Klapisch-Zuber, C., Tuscans and their Families: A Study of the Florentine Catasto of 1427 (New Haven, 1985)Google Scholar. For comment, see Kent, F.W., Household and Lineage in Renaissance Florence: The Family Life of the Capponi, Ginori, and Rucellai (Princeton, 1977), 11–14Google Scholar.
91 Herlihy and Klapisch-Zuber, Tuscans and their Families, 342, 343. For a similar understanding of ‘clan’ and ‘lineage’, from an anthropological perspective, see Goody, Development of the Family and Marriage, 224.
92 Klapisch-Zuber, C., ‘L'invention du passé familial à Florence (XIVe–XVe siècle)’, in Temps, mémoire, tradition au Moyen Âge (Aix-en-Provence, 1983), 99–103Google Scholar.
93 Herlihy and Klapisch-Zuber, Tuscans and their Families, 345–7.
94 Ciappelli, G., Memory, Family, and Self: Tuscan Family Books and Other European Egodocuments (14th–18th Century) (Leiden, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
95 Isenmann, Die deutsche Stadt, 777.
96 This double meaning is expressed by the terminology of ‘lines of descent’ and ‘lignages’ in Flandrin's, Jean-Louis influential Families in Former Times: Kinship, Household and Sexuality, trans. Southern, R. (Cambridge, 1979), 14–15Google Scholar.
97 Klapisch-Zuber, ‘L'invention du passé familial’, 102–3.
98 Kent, Household and Lineage, 6.
99 For the Ginori, Capponi and Rucellai, see ibid., 17. For the ‘fiscal’ household, see Herlihy and Klapisch-Zuber, Tuscans and their Families, 10, 12–13; Molho, Marriage Alliance, 203–4.
100 Kent, Household and Lineage, part 2.
101 Lansing, Florentine Magnates, 31.
102 Gravela, M., ‘The primacy of patrimony: kinship strategies of the political elite of Turin in the late Middle Ages (1340–1490)’, Continuity and Change, 32 (2017), 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
103 Ibid., 307–9.
104 Isenmann, Die deutsche Stadt, 777. For a similar distinction, see Rohmann, G., ‘Chroniques urbaines et livres de famille: les villes allemandes du XVe au XVIe siècle. Comparaison entre Augsbourg et Hambourg’, Histoire Urbaine, 28 (2010), 32Google Scholar.
105 Molho, Marriage Alliance, 340, 341.
106 Ibid., 342–4.
107 See the essays collected in Chojnacki, S., Women and Men in Renaissance Venice: Twelve Essays on Patrician Society (Baltimore, 2000), esp. ch. 10Google Scholar.
108 Teuscher, S., ‘Parenté, politique et comptabilité: chroniques familiales autour de 1500 (Suisse et Allemagne du Sud)’, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 59 (2004), 851–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Teuscher, ‘Politics of kinship’, 78–87.
109 This is one of the themes of Marcus Meer's forthcoming Ph.D. thesis, which I am supervising at Durham with Len Scales.
110 King, D., ‘Medieval glass-painting’, in Rawcliffe, C. and Wilson, R. (eds.), Medieval Norwich (London, 2004), 127–8Google Scholar. For one context, see Sheingorn, P., ‘Appropriating the Holy Kinship: gender and family history’, in Ashley, K. and Sheingorn, P. (eds.), Interpreting Cultural Symbols: St. Anne in Late Medieval Society (London, 1990), 169–98Google Scholar.
111 Klapisch-Zuber, ‘L'invention du passé familial’, 104.
112 For the ‘Medieval Urban Household’ project, see Jones, S. Rees et al. , ‘The later medieval English urban household’, History Compass, 5 (2007), 112–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Kowaleski, M. and Goldberg, P.J.P. (eds.), Medieval Domesticity: Home, Housing and Household in Medieval England (Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar.
113 For probate inventories, see TNA, PROB 2 and Leech, R.H., The Town House in Medieval and Early Modern Bristol (Swindon, 2014), ch. 5Google Scholar. For wills, see Liddy, L., ‘Affective bequests: creating emotion in York wills, 1400–1600’, in Champion, M. and Lynch, A. (eds.), Understanding Emotions in Early Europe (Turnhout, 2015), 273–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
114 King, C., ‘Private lives and public power: Norwich merchants’ houses between the 14th and 16th centuries’, in Heslop, T.A. and Lunnon, H.E. (eds.), Norwich: Medieval and Early Modern Art, Architecture and Archaeology (Leeds, 2015), 341–58Google Scholar.
115 For the work of reconstruction, see e.g. The Topography of Medieval and Early Modern Bristol: Part I, ed. Leech, R.H. (Bristol Record Society, 48, 1997)Google Scholar, and the largely unpublished research of the Norwich Survey, whose maps were deposited in the Norfolk Record Office (NRO, MC 146/52) in the 1980s. For interpretation, see Rees Jones, York.
116 NRO, NCR 1; London Metropolitan Archives (LMA), CLA/023/DW, CLA/023/PL/01, CLA/023/CP/01. Summary translations of the wills are published in Calendar of Wills Proved and Enrolled in the Court of Husting, London 1258–1688, ed. Sharpe, R.R., 2 vols. (London, 1889–90)Google Scholar.
117 Kowaleski, M., ‘The history of urban families in medieval England’, Journal of Medieval History, 14 (1988), 51–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
118 Borough Customs, ed. M. Bateson, 2 vols. (Selden Society, 18, 21, 1904, 1906). A notable exception is Hanawalt, who argued in Wealth of Wives that the legal rights of women facilitated the circulation of capital in late medieval London.
119 A Calendar of the Cartularies of John Pyel and Adam Fraunceys, ed. O'Connor, S.J. (Camden, 5th series, 2, 1993), 75–9, 88–9Google Scholar.
120 British Library, Add. MS 18783; LMA, COL/CS/01/015. For brief comment on the Liber Lynne, see Richardson, M., Middle-Class Writing in Late Medieval London (London, 2011), 74Google Scholar.
121 For a short conspectus of examples, see Isenmann, Die deutsche Stadt, 764–5. There is a growing secondary literature on these books, principally but not exclusively in German, notably the 2007 volume edited by Birgit Studt: Haus- und Familienbücher. For the possible influence of Florentine role models on Ulman Stromer's book and on other German family books, see Zahnd, U.M., ‘Einige Bemerkungen zu spätmittelalterlichen Familienbüchern aus Nürnberg und Bern’, in Endres, R. (ed.), Nurnberg und Bern. Zwei Reichsstädte und ihre Landgebiete (Erlangen, 1990), 18, 35–6Google Scholar.
122 Rohmann, ‘Chroniques urbaines’, 22–3.
123 Tricard, J., ‘Les livres de raison français au miroir des livres de famille italiens: pour relancer une enquête’, Revue historique, 624 (2002), 993, 999Google Scholar. It is not the only reason, as Tricard explains.
124 Herlihy and Klapisch-Zuber, Tuscans and their Families, 357–8.
125 Kermode, J., ‘Sentiment and survival: family and friends in late medieval English towns’, Journal of Family History, 24 (1999), 15 n. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
126 Stadsarchief Gent (SAG), Familiearchief, Inventaris 78/1, Familiearchief, Inventaris 127; Rijksarchief Gent, Familiefonds Borluut, nr. 600. For the reconstructed archive of one London family, see J. Williams, ‘A late-medieval family and its archive: the Forsters of London, c. 1440–c. 1550’, University of London Ph.D. thesis, 2011. See also Alcock, N.W., ‘The Catesbys in Coventry: a medieval estate and its archives’, Midland History, 15 (1990), 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
127 See e.g. Boffey, J., ‘Bodleian Library, MS Arch. Selden B. 24 and definitions of the “household book”’, in Edwards, A.S.G. et al. (eds.), The English Medieval Book: Studies in Memory of Jeremy Griffiths (London, 2000), 125–34Google Scholar.
128 Although the quotation is from Fleming, ‘Telling tales’, 178, see Campbell, R.H. and Skinner, A.S. (eds.), The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. I (Oxford, 1976), 421–2Google Scholar, cited in Molho, Marriage Alliance, 1–2. For a similar argument, see Cohn, S.K. Jr, ‘Two pictures of family ideology taken from the dead in post-plague Flanders and Tuscany’, in Carlier, M. and Soens, T. (eds.), The Household in Late Medieval Cities: Italy and Northwestern Europe Compared (Leuven, 2001), 177–8Google Scholar.
129 TNA, C 241; Goddard, R., Credit and Trade in Later Medieval England, 1353–1532 (Basingstoke, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
130 TNA, PROB 11/13/83.
131 Kermode, Medieval Merchants, 286, 288, 290, 291. For a more recent appraisal, see T. Graham, ‘Knights and merchants: English cities and the aristocracy, 1377–1509’, University of Oxford D.Phil. thesis, 2017.
132 For this distinction, which was not always observed, see Calendar of Wills Proved and Enrolled in the Court of Husting, vol. I, xxiv–xxv, xxxi–xxxii, xlii.
133 Bristol Record Office, 04421/1a–c, 04422.
134 Clark, E., ‘City orphans and custody laws in medieval England’, American Journal of Legal History, 34 (1990), 168–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
135 SAG, Oud Archief, Serie 330.
136 Hanawalt, Growing up in Medieval London, 90–2, 95–6, 106–7.
137 Ibid., 107.
- 1
- Cited by