No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2009
1 For a review of that tradition, and of the content and impact of the Urban History Yearbook, 1974Google Scholar, see Bloomfield, E., ‘The Urban History Yearbook— interdisciplinary forum or indispensable research tool?’, Urban History Review/Revue d'histoire urbaine, 16 (1987), 75–7.Google Scholar
2 For a review of this work see Mohl, R.A., ‘;The new urban history and its alternatives: some reflections on recent U.S. scholarship on the twentieth century city’, Urban History Yearbook, 1983, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 ‘Register of Research in Progress on the History of London’, The London Journal, 13 (1987–1988), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Dyos, H.J., ‘Editorial’, Urban History Yearbook, 1974, 5–6Google Scholar and his inaugural lecture, Urbanity and Suburbanity, 1973.Google Scholar
5 Wheatley, P., ‘European urbanization: origins and consummation’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 17 (1986), 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Rollison, D., ‘The bourgeois soul of John Smyth of Nibley’, Social History, 12 (1987), 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Ibid., his emphasis.
You have
Access