¹ Duncan, C. and Wallach, D., ‘The universal survey museum’, Art History, 3 (1980), 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pointon, M., Art Apart: Art Institution and Ideology Across England and North America (New York, 1994)Google Scholar; Waterfield, G. (ed.), Palaces of Art: Art Galleries in Britain 1790–1900 (London, 1991).Google Scholar

² Becker, H., Art Worlds (Berkeley, 1982).Google Scholar

³ Bourdieu, P., The Field of Cultural Production (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar

⁴ Ibid.; Malraux, A., The Voices of Silence (London, 1954).Google Scholar

⁵ Ibid.,86.

⁶ There are three points which evince the homologies between Scottish and American lines of museum development. Firstly, both countries had to deal with the desideratum of a burgeoning art tradition due, largely, to the patronage gap (see Goodrich, L., Art of the United States: 1670–1966 (New York, 1966)).Google Scholar Secondly, this gap was filled in both cases by private, individual interests. Initially, as in Scotland, America's art institutions were controlled by members of the traditional professions and the landed classes. But slowly patrician power and sensibility gave way to bourgeois rationality and control, with institutions of high art emerging as part of middle-class and upper middle-class formation (see Zukin, S., ‘Art in the arms of power: market relations and collective patronage in the capitalist state’, Theory and Society, 11 (1982), 423–51).Google Scholar Thirdly, the rise of substantial art museums – the National Gallery of Scotland in 1851, the Metropolitan Museum in New York and the Boston Museum of Fine Arts, both in 1870 – came to rest less on direct state initiative and national control, and more on the interests and conflicts of civic, urban elites. Hence, whilst most art museums in America before 1910 were established at the local level as an urban cultural resource, with the city authorities providing and maintaining the buildings, in Edinburgh, it is possible to ground the siting of the National Gallery in a broader movement of urban civility (see Youngson, A.J., The Making of Classical Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1966)).Google Scholar

⁷ Nenadic, S., ‘Scottish fiction and the material world in the early nineteenth century’, in Cummings, A.J. and Devine, T.M. (eds), Industry, Business and Society in Scotland since 1700 (Edinburgh, 1994).Google Scholar

⁸ Devine, T. M. (ed.), Conflict and Stability in Scottish Society (Edinburgh, 1990).Google Scholar

⁹ Nenadic, S., ‘The rise of the urban middle classes’, in Devine, T.M. and Mitchison, R. (eds), People and Society in Scotland, vol. 1, 1760–1830 (Edinburgh, 1988).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Lang, P. H., ‘Music and the court in the eighteenth century’, in Fritz, P. and Williams, D. (eds), City and Society in the Eighteenth Century (Edinburgh, 1973), 151.Google Scholar

¹¹ Enthusiastic acclaim greeted the RSA's annual exhibitions in the press and art journalism generally. ‘Our Art and Exhibitions are unquestionably the best things our country can boast’, enthused one critic, who continued, ‘Put together our yearly crop of books, forensic speeches, and pulpit preachments, consider them, and then pass into the Academy's exhibition, and admit that the artists are clearly our best and cleverest body of men’, Iconoclast, , Fine Art Pamphlets – Scottish (Edinburgh, 1860), 4.Google Scholar

¹² Duncan, C., ‘Art museums and the ritual of citizenship’, in Karp, I. (ed.), Exhibiting Cultures (Edinburgh, 1991), 99.Google Scholar

¹³ Hook, A., ‘Scotland and Romanticism: the international scene’, in Gifford, D. (ed.), The History of Scottish Literature: the Nineteenth Century (Edinburgh, 1989), 317, 318, 316.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Lukács, G., The Historical Novel (London, 1962), 33.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Hauser, A., The Social History of Art, vol. III: Rococo, Classicism, Romanticism (London, 1962), 166.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Scott, W., Waverley (Edinburgh, 1814), 144–5, 175.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Williams, A. G. and Brown, A., The Bigger Picture: a History of Scottish Art (London, 1993), 133.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Withers, C., ‘The historical creation of the Scottish highlands’, in Donnachie, I. and Whatley, C. (eds), The Manufacture of Scottish History (Edinburgh, 1992).Google Scholar

¹⁹ For a discussion of this tendency in English landscape pictures see Barrell, J., The Dark Side of the Landscape (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar

²⁰ Royal Association for the Promotion of Fine Arts, Annual Report (1837–1838), 124Google Scholar, my emphasis.

²¹ A point which must escape development at present turns on the relationship between the ideas of Romanticism, especially the stress on novelty, self-expression and varied experience, and the aggrandizement of the art market, at this time. Romanticism may well have freed up the necessary motivations to purchase works of art by encouraging modern habits of consumption generally among the middle classes in Scotland (see Campbell, C., The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism (Oxford, 1987)).Google Scholar

²² Royal Association for the Promotion of Fine Arts, Annual Report (1838–1839), 16–17.Google Scholar

²³ Fraser, W.H. and Morris, R.J. (eds), People and Society in Scotland, vol. II, 1830–1914 (Edinburgh, 1990).Google Scholar

²⁴ Cited in Gordon, E., The Royal Scottish Academy 1826–1976 (Edinburgh, 1976), 5.Google Scholar

²⁵ Hauser, , The Social History of Art.Google Scholar