Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:25:50.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting civil society: deconstructing elite participation in the provincial English city, 1900–1950

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2013

NICK HAYES
NICK HAYES*
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Humanities, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With few dissenting voices, the historiography of twentieth-century urban civil society has been relayed through a prism of continuing and escalating elite disengagement. Within a paradigm of declinism, academics, politicians and social commentators contrast a past offering a richness of social commitment against a present characterized by lowering standards in urban governance. Put simply, the right sorts of people were no longer volunteering. Yet the data for such claims is insubstantial, and the applied methodology flawed. What are lacking are detailed empirical studies which offer flexible measures of status across a range of voluntary and political activities, so that we can better understand the social trends of urban volunteering across the first 50 years of the twentieth century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 287 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rubinstein, W., ‘Britain's elites in the inter-war period, 1918–39’, in Kidd, A. and Nicholls, D. (eds.), The Making of the British Middle Class? (Stroud, 1998), 198.Google Scholar

2 Garrard, J., ‘Urban elites, 1850–1914: the rule and decline of a new squireachy?’, Albion, 27 (1995), 583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Doyle, B., ‘The structure of elite power in the early twentieth-century city: Norwich, 1900–35’, Urban History, 24 (1997), 179–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, J., ‘Urban elites and urban history’, Urban History, 27 (2000), 269–74.Google Scholar

3 Nenadic, S., ‘Businessmen, the urban middle classes, and the “dominance” of manufacturers in nineteenth-century Britain’, Economic History Review, 44 (1991), 66–85Google Scholar; Daunton, M.J., Coal Metropolis: Cardiff 1870–1914 (Leicester, 1977), 149–51Google Scholar; Jones, G.W., Borough Politics: A Study of Wolverhampton Town Council, 1884–1964 (London, 1969), 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Lee, L.M., Social Leaders and Public Persons: A Study of County Government in Cheshire since 1918 (Oxford, 1963), 5–6Google Scholar; Trainor, R., ‘The middle class’, in Daunton, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Urban History of Britain, vol. III: 1840–1950 (Cambridge, 2000), 699–710.Google Scholar

5 Trainor, R., ‘The “decline” of British urban governance since 1850: a reassessment’, in Morris, R.J. and Trainor, R. (eds.), Urban Governance: Britain and Beyond since 1750 (Aldershot, 2000), 28–46Google Scholar; Hayes, N., ‘Things ain't what they used to be! Elites and constructs of consensus and conflict in twentieth-century English municipal politics’, in Doyle, B.M. (ed.), Urban Politics and Space in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Newcastle, 2007), 47–63.Google Scholar

6 R. Morris, ‘Author's response: urban governance in Britain and beyond since 1750’, Reviews in History (2001), www.history.ac.uk/reviews/paper/morrisr.html (accessed Feb. 2009).

7 The sample contained 3,320 individuals of which 10% could not be clearly identified, probably drawn disproportionately from the lower social classes.

8 McKibbin, R., Classes and Cultures: England 1918–1951 (Oxford, 1998), 44–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trainor, ‘The middle class’, 678–87; British Association for the Advancement of Science, A Scientific Survey of Nottingham and District (London, 1937), 40–1.

9 F. Hampton, ‘A brief survey of Nottingham's employment’, Jul. 1936 (in author's possession); Nottingham Journal, 21 Jul. 1936.

10 Nottingham Guardian, 2 Jan. 1934; Nottingham Journal, 4 Jan. 1938.

11 Trainor, ‘The middle class’, 687.

12 See Hayes, N., ‘“Calculating class”: housing, lifestyle and status in the provincial English city, 1900–1950’, Urban History, 36 (2009), 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Based on males leaving more than £25,000 as a percentage of total male deaths (over 25 years of age), adding a generous margin for under-recording and for status attributes not linked directly to wealth. Reports of Commission of His Majesty's Inland Revenue Y/E 1901, 1906, 1911: Cd 764, Cd 3110, Cd 5833.

14 Shapely, P., ‘Charity, status and leadership: charitable image and the Manchester man’, Journal of Social History, 32 (1998), 157–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stacey, M., Tradition and Change: A Study of Banbury (Oxford, 1960), 162–3.Google Scholar

15 Trainor, ‘The middle class’, 676; D. Reeder and R. Rodger, ‘Industrialisation and the city economy’, in Daunton ed.), Cambridge Urban History, 585; Savage, M. and Miles, A., The Remaking of the British Working Class, 1840–1940 (London, 1994), 62–3Google Scholar; McKibbin, Classes, 98–101.

16 Hennock, E.P., Fit and Proper Persons: Ideal and Reality in Nineteenth-Century Urban Government (London, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, passim; Trainor, R., Black Country Elites: The Exercise of Authority in an Industrialised Area 1830–1900 (Oxford, 1993), 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar; B. Doyle, ‘The changing functions of urban government’, in Daunton (ed.), Cambridge Urban History, 298–9.

17 Trainor, ‘“Decline”’, 33.

18 Morris, D.S. and Newton, K., ‘Profile of a local political elite: businessmen as community-decision-makers in Birmingham, 1838–1966’, New Atlantis, 2 (1970), 115–16.Google Scholar

19 Trainor, ‘“Decline”’, 34; Morris, J., Religion and Urban Change: Croydon, 1840–1914 (Woodbridge, 1992), 128–46Google Scholar; Green, S.J.D, Religion in the Age of Decline: Organisation and Experience in Industrial Yorkshire, 1870–1920 (Cambridge, 1996), 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Doyle, ‘Elite power’, 192–4; R. Trainor, ‘Neither metropolitan nor provincial: the interwar middle class’, in Kidd and Nicholls (eds.), Middle Class, 203–13; Gunn, S. and Bell, R., The Middle Classes: Their Rise and Sprawl (London, 2002), 86–91Google Scholar.

21 Trainor, ‘The middle class’, 705; Braithwaite, C., The Voluntary Citizen: An Enquiry into the Place of Philanthropy in the Community (London, 1938), 59Google Scholar.

22 Trainor, Black Country, 95, 103.

23 Kidd, A., ‘Civil society or the state? Recent approaches to the history of voluntary welfare’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 15 (2002), 335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Braithwaite, Voluntary Citizen, 230–1; Gorsky, M., Mohan, J., with Willis, T., Mutualism and Health Care: British Hospital Contributory Schemes in the Twentieth Century (Manchester, 2006), 103–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 139.

24 Beveridge, W. and Wells, A.F. (eds.), The Evidence for Voluntary Action (London, 1949), 81Google Scholar; Stacey, Tradition, 78–81; Trainor, Black Country, 312–27.

25 Perkin, H., The Rise of Professional Society: England since 1880 (London, 1989), 258–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Hayes, ‘“Calculating class”’.

27 Ibid. The rateable value of a house was its gross estimated rental, less an allowance for maintenance, repairs and insurance.

28 Tosh, J.A., A Man's Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England (Yale, 1999), 24–5Google Scholar, 47; C. Pooley, ‘Patterns on the ground: urban form, residential structure and the social construction of space’, in Daunton (ed.), Cambridge Urban History, 434.

29 Hayes, ‘“Calculating class”’.

30 Ibid., 125, for a discussion of standardizing data. Indicatively, properties over £70–5 pa would be labelled upper middle class (typically large, detached Victorian villas), those between £30 and £70 occupied by the middle middle class (from comfortable inter-war detached properties, to large Victorian semi-detached and detached villas), those between £12 and £30 lower middle class (bay terraced, two or three storey pre-1914 to inter-war semi-detached), and below £12–14 working class, with a typical by-laws terrace being valued at £9–10 pa.

31 Ex offico members such as medical staff on hospital boards are excluded from the calculations.

32 Trainor, Black Country, 103; Clements, R., Local Notables and the City Council (London, 1969), 52–8, 73–82Google Scholar; Garrard, ‘New squirearchy?’, 602–4.

33 Beveridge and Wells, Voluntary Action, pp. 155, 266; Jones, Borough Politics, 116–19; M. Daunton, ‘Payment and participation: welfare and state-formation in Britain 1900–1951’, Past and Present, 150 (1996), 189–90; Stacey, Tradition, chs. 2 and 3.

34 Nottingham Journal, 11 Apr. 1929.

35 Hayes, ‘“Calculating class”’, 117, 139–40.

36 Nottingham University Manuscripts Dept (NUMD) Uhg R12 and R16, Annual Reports, General Hospital, 1924, 1948.

37 Hogarth, R.G., The Trent and I Go Wondering By: Stories of Over Fifty Years of My Life in Nottingham (Nottingham, 1948), 9–11Google Scholar; Nottingham Journal, 11 Apr. 1929.

38 Jacob, F.H., A History of the General Hospital near Nottingham (London, 1951), 282–3.Google Scholar

39 NUMD Uhg M/1/3, House Committee Mins, General Hospital, 4 Sep. 1929, 12 Mar. 1930, 20 Feb. 1930, 4 Jun. 1930, 20 Aug. 1930, 26 Nov. 1930, 31 Dec. 1930; Hogarth, Trent and I, 50.

40 Nottingham Journal, 10 Feb. 1942.

41 Nottingham Evening News, 27 Nov. 1958; Hogarth, Trent and I, 51.

42 NUMD NUhf/M1, Executive Committee Mins, Ellerslie House, 11 Nov. 1921.

43 Garrard, ‘New squirearchy?’, 615–16; Shapely, ‘Charity’, 157–8.

44 NUMD NUhf/R2, Annual Report 1925–26, Ellerslie House; Nottingham and Notts Illustrated: ‘Up-to-Date’ Commercial Sketches (London, 1898), 64a–64b, 94–7Google Scholar.

45 Nottingham Guardian, 10 Nov. 1947.

46 Morris, D.S., and Newton, K., ‘The social composition of a city council: Birmingham 1925–1966’, Social and Economic Administration, 5 (1971), 33Google Scholar; Sharpe, L.J., ‘Elected representatives in local government’, British Journal of Sociology, 13 (1962), 205–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47 Hayes, ‘Things ain't’, 50–1, 56.

48 Trainor, ‘“Decline”’, 30–2.

49 Ibid., 35; Trainor, Black Country, passim.

50 Hayes, ‘“Calculating class”’, 116–22, 133–6.

51 Nottingham Guardian, 11 Jun. 1923; NUMD Uch M1/2, Executive Committee Mins, Children's Hospital, 27 May 1924.

52 Pollard, S., Britain's Prime and Britain's Decline: The British Economy 1870–1914 (London, 1989), 178–9.Google Scholar

53 NUMD Uch/R/2/4, J.D. Player, Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Sick and Annual Societies Children's Hospital Cot Fund, Annual Report 1929.

54 Roughly Pc1Vol-P individual score ranges can be contextualized as follows: upper class (+ 4.5 to + 3.0); upper middle (+ 3.5 to + 0. 2), middle middle (+0.2 to -1.5), lower middle (-2.0 to -3.0) and working (-3.5 to -4.0).

55 Rubinstein, ‘Britain's elites’, 196–200; Gunn, S., The Public Culture of the Victorian Middle Class: Ritual and Authority in the English Industrial City 1840–1914 (Manchester, 2000), 187–99Google Scholar; Trainor, ‘Neither metropolitan’, 203–13.

56 Meller, H. (ed.), Nottingham in the Eighteen Eighties: A Study in Social Change (Nottingham, 1971), 58–9.Google Scholar

57 Perkin, Professional Society, passim.

58 Routh, G., Occupation and Pay in Great Britain 1906–60 (Cambridge, 1965), 4–6.Google Scholar