¹ Hall, J.A., ‘In search of civil society’Google Scholar, in idem (ed.), Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison (Cambridge, 1995), 2.Google Scholar

² ‘Civil society has been found in the economy and in the polity; in the area between the family and the state, or the individual and the state; in non-state institutions which organize and educate citizens for political participation; even as an expression of the whole civilizing mission of modern society’: Kumar, K., ‘Civil society: an inquiry into the usefulness of an historical term’, British Journal of Sociology, 44, 3 (1993), 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ See, for example, Davidoff, L. and Hall, C., Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850 (London, 1987)Google Scholar who stress the ideological role of religion for linking ‘home life’ to an evolving associational public culture for a disenfranchised middle class, and Nossiter, T.J., Influence, Opinion and Political Idioms in Reformed England: Case Studies from the North-East, 1832–74 (Brighton, 1975)Google Scholar, who stresses the power of ‘influence’ in electioneering. This has inspired F. O'Gorman to test the ‘deference’ and ‘participatory’ models in contested elections: ‘Electoral behaviour in England, 1700–1872’, in Denley, P., Fogelvik, S. and Harvey, C. (eds), History and Computing II (Manchester, 1989), 221–2.Google Scholar

⁴ Bryant, C.G.A., ‘Social self-organisation, civility and sociology: a comment on Kumar's “Civil society”’, British Journal of Sociology, 44, 3 (1993), 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Gellner, E., ‘The importance of being modular’, in Hall, Civil Society, 41–3.Google Scholar

⁶ Hirst, P., ‘The state, civil society and the collapse of Soviet communism’, Economy and Society, 20, 2 (1991), 220, 231, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ The division between Habermas's ‘public sphere’ which is centred on communication and civil society based on associations is stressed by Bryant, who argues that the latter is the more useful: Bryant, C.G.A., ‘A further comment on Kumar's “Civil society”’, British Journal of Sociology, 45, 3 (1994), 497–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Habermas, J., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Enquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Burger, T. and Lawrence, F. (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), 32.Google Scholar

⁸ Shils, E., ‘The virtue of civil society’, Government and Opposition, 26, 1 (1991), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ Gellner, E., Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals (London, 1994), 98–100.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Storch, R.D., ‘The policeman as domestic missionary: urban discipline and popular culture in northern England, 1850–80’, Journal of Social History, 9 (1976), 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Silver, A., ‘The demand for order in civil society’, in Bordua, D.S. (ed.), The Police: Six Sociological Essays (New York, 1967), 13Google Scholar; Reith, C., British Police and the Democratic Ideal (Oxford, 1943), 4.Google Scholar

¹¹ Keane, J. (ed.), Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives (London, 1988), 40–3Google Scholar; Kumar, , ‘Civil society’, 376–83.Google Scholar

¹² Karlson, N., The State of State: An Inquiry Concerning the Role of Invisible Hands in Politics and Civil Society (Uppsala, 1993), 98, 116.Google Scholar

¹³ de Tocqueville, A., Democracy in America (1835–1840), trans. Lawrence, G. and Mayer, J.P. (London, 1994), 68.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Morris, R.J., ‘Subscriber democracies and civil society in Britain’ (unpubl. paper, 1995).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Checkland, O., Philanthropy in Victorian Scotland. Social Welfare and the Voluntary Principle (Edinburgh, 1980), 61–2Google Scholar; Wolff, J., ‘The culture of separate spheres: the role of culture in nineteenth-century public and private life’, in Wolff, J. and Seed, J. (eds), The Culture of Capital: Art, Power and the Nineteenth-Century Middle Class (Manchester, 1988), 118–21.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Seligman, A., The Idea of Civil Society (New York, 1992), 33.Google Scholar Shils identifies ‘civil manners’ as the third component of his conception of civil society (the other two are a range of autonomous institutions and a particular complex of relationships between civil society and the state which ensures separation between the two): ‘The virtue of civil society’, 4.

¹⁷ Mouzelis, N., ‘Modernity, late development and civil society’, in Hall, Civil Society, 237.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Morris, R.J., Class, Sect and Party: The Making of the British Middle Class. Leeds 1820–50 (Manchester, 1990), 249–61.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Godin, J.-B.A., Solutions Sociales (Paris, 1871)Google Scholar: see Markus, T.A., Buildings and Power: Freedom and Control in the Origins of Modern Building Type (London, 1993), 298–9.Google Scholar

²⁰ Morris, , ‘Subscriber democracies’, 6–7.Google Scholar

²¹ Morris, , Class, Sect and Party, 264–77.Google Scholar

²² Gellner, , ‘The importance of being modular’, 43.Google Scholar

²³ Morris, R.J. and Morton, G., ‘The re-making of Scotland: a nation within a nation, 1850–1920’, in Lynch, M. (ed.), Scotland, 1850–1979: Society, Politics and the Union (London, 1993), 15.Google Scholar

²⁴ The clearest example is Birmingham: see Briggs, A., Victorian Cities (London, 1963), ch. 5.Google Scholar

²⁵ Halévy, E., The Triumph of Reform (1830–1841) (London, 1961), 100.Google Scholar

²⁶ Bentham, J., Constitutional Code for the Use of All Nations and All Governments Professing Liberal Opinions, Vol. 1 (1830), ed. Rosen, F. and Burns, J.H. (Oxford, 1983), 15.Google Scholar Doubts are raised in Gellner, , Conditions of Liberty, 98–100.Google Scholar

²⁷ Justice to Scotland. Report of the Great Public Meeting of the National Association for the Vindication of Scottish Rights, held in the City Hall, Glasgow, , 12 15, 1853Google Scholar (Edinburgh, 1853), 11.

²⁸ Morton, G., ‘Scottish rights and “centralisation” in the mid-nineteenth century’, Nations and Nationalism, 2, 2 (1996), 258–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ Glasgow's first Police Act was in 1800.

³⁰ Irons, J.C., The Burgh Police (Scotland) Act, 1892 (Edinburgh, 1893), ix.Google Scholar

³¹ Atkinson, M., ‘The organisation of local government in Scotland’, Political Science Quarterly, XVIII, 1 (1903), 73, 86Google Scholar, argues this showed Scotland to be administered, not legislated for–a function of its separate legal system.

³² The comparable cost to obtain a charter in England ‘was at the very least over £100’: ibid., 72.

³³ Ross, W.A., ‘Early Scottish local government’, Public Administration, XXIV (Spring 1946)Google Scholar.

³⁴ These suburban ‘free-riders’ were a particular problem for Glasgow where it was surrounded by nine parasitic police burghs until 1891: Atkinson, ‘Local government in Scotland’, 72.

³⁵ Although not all burghs were keen to exploit these new powers: Police (Scotland) Abstract of Return from each Burgh in Scotland, PP 1847, vol. LVII; Carson, K. and Idzikowska, H., ‘The social production of Scottish policing, 1795–1900’, in Hay, D. and Snyden, F. (eds), Policing and Prosecution in Britain, 1750–1850 (Oxford, 1989), 274.Google Scholar

³⁶ Robert Wallace, Liberal MP for Greenock, Hansard, 3rd ser., 15, 29 Jan. – 28 Feb. (1833), 646–50.Google Scholar

³⁷ For a useful discussion on this legislation, see Carson, and Idzikowska, , ‘Social production’, 270–4.Google Scholar

³⁸ Case for the Commissioners of Police for the City of Edinburgh and Adjoining Districts, for the Opinion of Counsel (1854), 2Google Scholar, emphasis added. The Commissioners empowered to carry the 1805 Act into effect were: Lord Provost, four Bailies, Dean of Guild, Treasurer, Deacon Convenor, Sheriff-Depute (but not his substitute) and fifteen other public functionaries.

³⁹ Weber, M., The City, trans, and ed. Martindale, D. and Neuwirth, G. (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Although one contemporary argued that this Act was worded to save fees at the parliament office and ‘before experience showed the essential importance of expressing a clear separation between the executive and economical branches of the police’: Simpson, J., Hints on the Principles of a Constitutional Police in Observations on ‘A letter to the inhabitants of Edinburgh on the new Police Bill’ [by Henry Cockburn] (Edinburgh, 1822), 17, 23.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Report of the Committees appointed by the Merchant Company, Incorporations, and Several other Public Bodies in the City of Edinburgh; to Consider the Effects of the Act lately Passed for Regulating the Police of the said City [Edinburgh, 1806], 2–3.Google Scholar

⁴² Journal of the House of Commons, 88 (1833), 236.Google Scholar

⁴³ Merchant Company (Edinburgh, 1806), 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ A blow at the root! Being Queries relating to the Police of the City of Edinburgh. Addressed to the Citizens by a Fellow Citizen (Edinburgh, 1812), 15.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Annual Accounts of the Edinburgh Police Establishment, for the year from Whitsunday 1857 to Whitsunday 1858 (Edinburgh, 1858), 2–3.Google Scholar The complexities of this legislation are reflected in Irons' annotated guide to the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892 which runs to over 940 pages. Attempts were made, however, to make the details of the fines comprehensible to the less educated with the publication of Extracts from the Edinburgh Police Act, 1879, for the Benefit of Children and Working People (Edinburgh, 1879).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ This debate focuses around who should take responsibility for the fraudulent conduct of a clerk in the Police Establishment: see, J.C.S., Remarks on Captain Brown's Letter to the Lord Provost of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, 1820), 204Google Scholar; Simpson, , Hints on the Principles, 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Lord Provost McLaren in a letter to Linton (14 Sept. 1854), quoting a report on the limit of the power of the Lord Provost and Sheriff over the Superintendent of Police circulated on 9 Nov. 1843, Case for the Commissioners of Police, 41.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Constitution of the Police Force of the City of Edinburgh, Duties of the Officers and Regulations for their Government and Guidance, Prepared by Linton, Thomas, Superintendent of Police (Edinburgh, 1861), 10–11.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ 33&34 Viet., ch. xlviii [20 Jun. 1870].

⁵⁰ The Lord Provost, Magistrate and Town Council of Edinburgh; the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh; the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh; the Senatus Academicus of the University of Edinburgh; the Company of Merchants of the City of Edinburgh; the Chamber of Commerce and Manufactures of Edinburgh; the Senators of the College of Justice; the Faculty of Advocates; the Society of Writers to her Majesty's Signet; the Society of Solicitors before the Supreme Courts of Scotland; the Ministers of the Gospel of Edinburgh; six managers chosen by the General Court of Contributors; of the six, two shall be chosen from among the persons who are members of the Corporation who were connected to the Convalescent House belonging to the Corporation.

⁵¹ Kumar, , ‘Civil society’, 379.Google Scholar

⁵² Seligman, , The Idea, 102.Google Scholar

⁵³ Garcia, S., ‘Cities and citizenship’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, 1 (03 1996), 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁴ See, for example, An Act for enabling the purchase of the Braid Hills by the Lord Provost, Magistrates and Council of the City of Edinburgh to be completed; for extending the municipal and police boundaries of the city, including the royal burgh; for prohibiting and regulating games on Bruntsfield Links; and for other purposes [2 05 1890], 53Google Scholar Vict., ch. IV, 4.

⁵⁵ House of Commons, Select Committee on Private Bills (Group D), Edinburgh Boundaries Extension and Tramways Bill June 22,1920 (1920), 246Google Scholar, questions 2384–96.

⁵⁶ McCrae, G., The Amalgamation of Edinburgh and Leith (Edinburgh, 1896), 11–12.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Edinburgh Boundaries Extension and Tramways Bill, Brief for Counsel for the Promoters The Corporation of the City of Edinburg, Session 1920, Edinburgh Corporation (1920), 25.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ McCrae, , The Amalgamation, 11.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Edinburgh Boundaries Extension and Tramways Bill (1920), 25.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Memorandum and Outline of a Scheme of Amalgamation of Edinburgh, Leith, and Portobello, and the intermediate areas, and of an extension of the Boundaries thereof to include an additional area within the County of Midlothian as may be defined within limits to be afterwards fixed (c. 1894), 9.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Reconstruction Problems, 20.Google Scholar

⁶² Provost's prefatory note, ibid., 3.

⁶³ Statement by Mr Honoratus Lloyd, KC, part of the Counsel for Promoters, Select Committee on Private Bills (1920), 7.Google Scholar Although Leith had earlier used the example of the drainage for a new hospital in Leith being directed through Leith and not Edinburgh as part of its case to fend off amalgamation in 1896. See the motion of Munro Ferguson regarding the Edinburgh Extension Bill (By Order), Hansard, 4th ser., 41 (1896), 945–52.Google Scholar Portobello was amalgamated that year in the Edinburgh Extension Act (1896), 59&60Google Scholar Vict., ch. cciii.

⁶⁴ Edinburgh Boundaries Extension and Tramways Bill. Brief for Counsel (1920), 7.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Captain Wedgwood Benn presented a petition to the Commons late in the day from the citizens of the Burgh of Leith pointing out that on three occasions, after taking time to enquire into the issue, Parliament had rejected such an amalgamation and he made reference to a recent petition which had shown a majority of Leith's residents to favour the status quo: Hansard, vol. 130, H.C. Deb. 5th ser., 8 01 1920, 191.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Grierson, A., ‘One hundred years of Scottish local government’, Public Administration, xiii, 3 (1935), 233.Google Scholar For the detail of the changes, see Whyte, W.E., Local Government in Scotland, with complete statutory references, 2nd edn. (London, 1936), 20–1.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ I. Levitt, ‘Scottish sentiment, administrative devolution and Westminster, 1885–1964’, in Lynch, , Scotland, 1850–1979, 36.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Murray, C.deB., How Scotland is Governed (Glasgow, 1947), 55.Google Scholar It was empowered under the Local Government (Scotland) Act, 1894; Grierson, ‘One hundred years’, 234.

⁶⁹ See, for example, Minutes of Procedure in Enquiry (before the Sheriff of the Lothians) under the representation to the Right Hon. the Secretary for Scotland by the Town Council of the Burgh of Leith for uniting within one parish the existing parishes, and parts of parishes, situated within the said parish of Leith, 5–6 and 24 12 1894,348ff.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Murray, , How Scotland is Governed, 48, 50.Google Scholar

⁷¹ The Scottish Office's civil service structure was improved throughout the 1930s almost on a par with the large UK departments, yet it was still claimed to be under-staffed: Levitt, I. (ed.), The Scottish Office: Depression and Reconstruction, 1939–2959 (Edinburgh, 1992)Google Scholar; Levitt, , ‘Scottish sentiment’, 35, 37–8.Google Scholar

⁷² The editor J. Keane's ‘Introduction’ in Civil Society, 26.Google Scholar

⁷³ David Held has defined ‘overload’ as excessive demands on government and ‘legitimacy’ as the undermining of traditionally unquestioned norms and the politicization of more and more issues: Models of Democracy (Cambridge, 1987), 237.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Levitas, R. (ed.), The Ideology of the New Right (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar; King, D.S., The New Right: Politics, Markets and Citizenship (London, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Offe, C., Contradictions in the Welfare State (London, 1984)Google Scholar; Rose, R. and Peters, B., Can Governments go Bankrupt? (New York, 1977)Google Scholar; Jänicke, M., State Failure: The Impotence of Politics in Industrial Society, trans. Braley, A. (Cambridge, 1990), 32–3ff.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ D. Urquhart, speech to House of Commons on ‘Public Health Bill’, Hansard, 3rd ser., XCVIII, 5 05 1848, 712–13Google Scholar; Shannon, R., ‘David Urquhart and the Foreign Affairs Committees’, in Hollis, P. (ed.), Pressure From Without in Early Victorian England (London, 1974).Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Bagehot, W., The English Constitution (London, 1867)Google Scholar, with introduction by Grossman, R.H.S. (London, 1963), 153.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Tocqueville, , Democracy, 66–7.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Ibid., 67: ‘The towns of New England buy and sell, prosecute or are indicted, augment or diminish their rates, and no administrative authority ever thinks of offering any opposition’.

⁷⁹ Reports and Speeches on Local Taxation by George J. Goschen, M.P. (London, 1872), 11, 23, 143.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Supplementary and Final Report by the Accountant of Police on the Collection of the Police Establishment and other local rates leviable in connection therewith, for the year from Whitsunday 1864 to Whitsunday 1865 (Edinburgh, 1867).Google Scholar

⁸¹ Brown, S.J., Thomas Chalmers and the Godly Commonwealth in Scotland (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar

⁸² Banquet in Honour of the Right Honourable the Earl of Eglinton and Winton, K.T., President of the National Association for the Vindication of Scottish Rights to be held at the City Hall, Glasgow, on Wednesday, the 4th October, 1854 (Edinburgh, 1854), 4.Google Scholar

⁸³ Morton, ,‘Scottish rights’, 271–3.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Morton, G., Unionist-Nationalism: Governing Urban Scotland, 1830–1860 (East Linton, 1999)Google Scholar, chs 4 and 5.

⁸⁵ Arato, A., ‘Civil society, history and socialism: reply to John Keane’, Praxis International, 9, 1–2 (1989), 141.Google Scholar