Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:11:31.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The city as a transient home: residential patterns of Moscow workers around the turn of the twentieth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2012

ANNA MAZANIK
ANNA MAZANIK*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Central European University, Nador u. 9, Budapest, 1051, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article examines the social topography and the housing patterns of Moscow workers in the context of their social status and experience of immigration. It argues that in the early twentieth century Moscow was characterized by extremely poor housing conditions and the absence of clear residential segregation of social classes due to the lack of profound planning policy and urban reforms.

Type
Eastern European Cities
Information
Urban History , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 51 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I. Verner, Sovremennoe khozyaistvo goroda Moskvy (Modern Economy of Moscow) (Moscow, 1913), 6.

2 Park, R.E. and Burgess, E.W., The City (Chicago, 1925)Google Scholar; Sennett, R., Families against the City: Middle-Class Homes of Industrial Chicago (Cambridge, MA, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, G.S., Outcast London: A Study in the Relationship between Classes in Victorian Society (Oxford, 1971)Google Scholar; Warner, S.B. Jr, The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of its Growth (Philadelphia, 1968), 161–77Google Scholar; Cannadine, D., ‘Residential differentiation in nineteenth-century towns: from shapes on the ground to shapes in society’, in Johnson, J.H. and Pooley, C.G. (eds.), The Structure of Nineteenth-Century Cities (London, 1982), 235–52Google Scholar.

3 Harvey, D., Consciousness and the Urban Experience: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization (Baltimore, 1975)Google Scholar; Olsen, D., The City as a Work of Art: London, Paris, Vienna (New Haven, 1986), 132–58Google Scholar; Hall, P., Cities in Civilization (London, 1998), 158–201Google Scholar.

4 Statisticheskiy atlas goroda Moskvy (Moscow Statistical Atlas) (Moscow, 1911), 55. Domestic servants, though comprising around one tenth of the city labour force, are excluded from the analysis because their settlement patterns corresponded to their workplace, and therefore did not reflect the residential patterns of the urban poor.

5 According to the memoirs of P. Timofeev, the word ‘rabochii’ initially was applied exclusively to the unskilled worker and was an insult to the skilled worker, referred to as ‘masterovoi’. See Timofeev, P., ‘What the factory worker lives by’, in Bonnell, V. (ed.), The Russian Worker: Life and Labour under the Tsarist Regime (Berkeley, 1983), 75.Google Scholar

6 Hohenberg, P. and Lees, L., The Making of Urban Europe, 1000–1950 (Cambridge, MA, 1985), 237.Google Scholar

7 Zvyagintsev, E.A.et al. (eds.), Moskva (Moscow, 1915), 112Google Scholar; Glavneishiye predvaritelnyye dannyye perepisi goroda Moskvy 6 marta 1912 g. (Main Preliminary Data from the Moscow Census of 6 March 1912) (Moscow, 1913).

8 Anderson, B., Internal Migration during Modernization in Late Nineteenth-Century Russia (Princeton, 1980), 106Google Scholar; Mironov, B., The Social History of Imperial Russia, 1700–1917 (Boulder, 1999), 333, 341–2Google Scholar.

9 Kurkin, P.I., Statistika dvizheniya naseleniya v Moskovskoy gubernii, 1883–1897 (Statistics of the Population Movement in Moscow Province) (Moscow, 1902).Google Scholar

10 Mironov, The Social History of Imperial Russia, 333.

11 Bradley, J., Muzhik and Muscovite: Urbanization in Late Imperial Russia (Berkeley, 1985), 103.Google Scholar

12 Bater, J., ‘Transience, residential persistence, and mobility in Moscow and St Petersburg, 1900–1914’, Slavic Review, 39 (1980), 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Dement'yev, E.M., Fabrika: chto ona dayet naseleniyu i chto ona u nego beret (The Factory: What it Gives to People and What it Takes from Them) (Moscow, 1897), 17–26.Google Scholar

14 Rashin, A.G., Formirovaniye rabochego klassa Rossii (The Formation of Russian Working Class) (Moscow, 1958), 356.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 362.

16 Mironov, The Social History of Imperial Russia, 347; Burds, Jeffrey, Peasant Dreams and Market Policies: Labor Migration and the Russian Village, 1861–1905 (Pittsburgh, 1998), 25–38Google Scholar.

17 Statisticheskiy atlas goroda Moskvy (Moscow, 1887), 43; Gerö, A. and Poór, J. (eds.), Budapest: A History from its Beginnings to 1996 (Boulder, 1997), 104Google Scholar.

18 Verner, Sovremenno e khozyaistvo goroda Moskvy, 9–10.

19 Dement'yev, Fabrika, 247–9; for the analysis of the family patterns in peasant migration see also Johnson, R., ‘Peasant and proletariat: migration, family patterns and regional loyalties’, in Eklof, B. and Frank, S. (eds.), The World of the Russian Peasant: Post-Emancipation Culture and Society (Boston, MA, 1990), 82–3Google Scholar.

20 E.A. Oliunina, ‘The tailoring trade in Moscow and the villages of Moscow and Riazan’ provinces: material on the history of the domestic industry in Russia’, in Bonnell (ed.), The Russian Worker, 160–1.

21 Timofeev, ‘What the factory worker lives by’, 79.

22 Ibid., 78–9.

23 Vedomost’ tsen na zemlyu goroda Moskvy (Register of Land Prices in Moscow) (Moscow, 1911).

24 See Trushchenko, O.E., Prestizh tsentra: gorodskaya sotsialnaya segregatsiya v Moskve (The Prestige of the Centre: Urban Social Segregation in Moscow) (Moscow, 1995)Google Scholar, and P. Ilyin, ‘Georgafiya kul'tury v Moskve v kontse XIX – nachale XX veka’ (Cultural geography of Moscow in the late nineteenth to early twentieth centuries), in P. Ilyin and B. Ruble (eds.), Moskva rubezha XIX I XX stoletiy: vzglyad v proshloe izdaleka (Moscow at the Turn of the Century: Glance into the Past from Afar) (Moscow, 2004).

25 Kropotkin, P.A., Zapiski revolyutsionera (Notes of a Revolutionary) (Moscow, 1988), 38.Google Scholar

26 Statisticheskiy atlas goroda Moskvy, 1911, 55–6.

27 Verner, Sovremenno e khozyaistvo goroda Moskvy, 5.

28 See, for instance, Bill, V., The Forgotten Class: The Russian Bourgeoisie from the Earliest Beginnings to 1900 (New York, 1959)Google Scholar; Balzer, H. (ed.) Russia's Missing Middle Class: The Professions in Russian History (Armonk, NY, 1996)Google Scholar.

29 Bater, J., St Petersburg: Industrialization and change (Montreal, 1976), 287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Zvyagintsev et al. (eds.), Moskva, 253.

31 Kozminykh-Lanin, I.M., Devyatiletniy period fabrichno-zavodskoy promyshlennosti Moskovskoy gubernii (Nine-Year Period of the Industry in Moscow Province) (Moscow, 1911), 56.Google Scholar

32 Spisok fabrik i zavodov g. Moskvy i Moskovskoy gubernii (The List of Factories in Moscow and Moscow Province) (Moscow, 1916).

33 Kablukov, K.A., Studencheskiy kvartirny vopros v Moskve (The Housing Question among Moscow Students) (Moscow, 1908), 77.Google Scholar

34 TsIAM (Central Historical Archive of Moscow), f. 179, op. 63., d. 18390, 9–10.

35 Statisticheskiy ezhegodnik goroda Moskvy (Moscow Annual Statistical Book) (Moscow, 1908–16), 82.

36 Kir'yanov, Yu.I. and Volin, M.S. (eds.), Rabochiy klass Rossii ot zarozhdeniya do nachala XX v. (The Russian Working Class from its Emergence till the Beginning of the Twentieth Century) (Moscow, 1989), 340.Google Scholar

37 Verner, Sovremenno e khozyaistvo goroda Moskvy, 7.

38 Doklad Moskovskoy gorodskoy upravy (Report of the Moscow City Board), 1914, no. 1914, quoted in Alaverdyan, S.K., Zhilishchny vopros v Moskve (Housing Question in Moscow) (Yerevan, 1961; original edn 1915), 33–4Google Scholar. These statistics were also used in the studies by Bradley, Muzhik and Muscovite, 196, and Ruble, B., Second Metropolis: Pragmatic Pluralism in Gilded Age Chicago, Silver Age Moscow and Meiji Osaka (Cambridge, 2001), 266Google Scholar.

39 Bater, St Petersburg, 329, quoted in Ruble, Second Metropolis, 266.

40 S.I. Kanatchikov, ‘From the story of my life’, in Bonnell (ed.), The Russian Peasant, 40.

41 Ibid., 66.

42 Kir'yanov and Volin (eds.), Rabochiy klass Rossii ot zarozhdeniya do nachala XX v., 340; Kablukov, Studencheskiy kvartirny vopros v Moskve, 33, 77.

43 Sokolov, D.A. and Grebenshchikov, V.I., Smertnost’ v Rossii i borba s neyu (Mortality in Russia and Struggle against It) (St Petersburg, 1901), 7–8.Google Scholar

44 Bradley, Muzhik and Muscovite, 200.

45 Statisticheskiy atlas goroda Moskvy, 1911, 55.

46 Dement'yev, Fabrika, 171.

47 Ibid., 175–6.

48 Kishkin, N., ‘Zhilishchny vopros v Moskve i blizhayshiye zadachi v ego razreshenii gorodskoy dumoy’ (Housing question in Moscow and immediate tasks of the municipality to solve it), Gorodskoye delo, 5–6 (1913), 353.Google Scholar

49 Kishkin, ‘Zhilishchny vopros v Moskve’, 353.

50 Stavrovsky, V., ‘Sanitarnoye sostoyaniye fabrik odnoy iz yugo-vostochnykh okrain Moskvy’ (Sanitary conditions of the factories in one of the south-eastern outskirts of Moscow), Izvestya Moskovkoy gorodskoy dumy, 6–7 (1909), 48.Google Scholar

51 Boldina, E., ‘Statisticheskiy portret Moskvy na 1910 g’ (Statistical portrait of Moscow in 1910), Moskovskiy Arkhiv, 1 (1996), 162–83.Google Scholar

52 Statisticheskiy atlas goroda Moskvy (Moscow, 1890), vol. VII; Bradley, Muzhik and Muscovite, 196.

53 See for instance Hamm, M., ‘The modern Russian city: an historiographical analysis’, Journal of Urban History, 4 (1977), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 Kropotkin, Zapiski revolyutsionera, 38–40.

55 Sanitarnyye usloviya ko echno-komorochnykh kvartir v rabochikh rayonakh Moskvy (Sanitary Conditions of the Cot-and-Corner Apartments in the Workers’ Districts of Moscow) (Moscow, 1899), 13.

56 Kleptsova, N.Z., ‘O syrosti kamennykh zdaniy i kolichestvennoye opredeleniye yeye’ (About the dampness of stone buildings and its estimation), in Trudy vtorogo s'yezda russkikh vrachey v Moskve, vol. I (Moscow, 1887), 31–5Google Scholar; Bogopol'skiy, B.L., ‘K voprosu o prinyatii v zakonodatel'nom poryadke mer dlya uluchsheniya v gorodakh sanitarnogo sostoyaniya vsekh zhilykh pomeshcheniy, sdavaemykh vnayem’ (To the question of legislative measures to improve the sanitary conditions of all the flats for rent in the cities), in Vos'moy Pirogovskiy s'yezd, vol. III (Moscow, 1902), 47–8)Google Scholar.

57 Bullock, N., ‘Berlin’, in Daunton, M.J., Housing the Workers, 1850–1914 (London and New York, 1990), 219.Google Scholar

58 G. Gyáni, ‘Budapest’ in Daunton, Housing the Workers, 169.

59 Bradley, Muzhik and Muscovite, 197.

60 Sanitarnyye usloviya, 19.

61 Olsen, The City, 137–58.

62 Zvyagintsev et al. (eds.), Moskva, 235.

63 Maderthaner, W. and Musner, L., Unruly Masses: The Other Side of the Fin-de-Siècle Vienna (New York, 2008), 32.Google Scholar

64 Gilyarovsky, V., Moskva i moskvichi (Moscow and Muscovites) (Moscow, 1997), 25.Google Scholar

65 Kishkin, ‘Zhilishchny vopros v Moskve’, 293.

66 Ruble, Second Metropolis, 277.

67 Kishkin, ‘Zhilishchny vopros v Moskve’, 292–3.

68 Ibid., 292.

69 Ibid., 299.

70 Thurston, R., Liberal City, Conservative State: Moscow and Russia's Urban Crisis, 1906–1914 (Oxford, 1987), 44.Google Scholar

71 Bradley, Muzhik and Muscovite, 37.

72 Bogopol'skiy, ‘K voprosu o prinyatii v zakonodatel'nom poryadke mer dlya uluchsheniya v gorodakh sanitarnogo sostoyaniya vsekh zhilykh pomeshcheniy, sdavaemykh vnayem’, 50; Pokrovskaya, M.I., Sanitarnyi nadzor nad zhilishchami i sanitarnaya organizatsiya v razlichnykh gosudarstvakh (Sanitary Control of the Housing and Sanitary Organization in Different Countries) (St Petersburg, 1897), 128, 132Google Scholar.

73 Quoted in Thurston, Liberal City, 41.