Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:24:53.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A ‘social evil’: Liverpool moneylenders 1920s–1940s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2015

PETER FEARON
PETER FEARON*
Affiliation:
School of History, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the 1920s and 1930s many working-class families needed emergency credit. Their use of pawnbrokers is well documented but the presence of a network of moneylenders, most of whom were women operating from their own homes, is not. This article examines the background to and the impact of the Moneylenders Act (1927) which was designed to reduce the number of working-class lenders, widely perceived as disreputable, in order to protect vulnerable borrowers, most of whom were women. Using Liverpool as a case-study, I also examine the possible reasons for the dramatic decline in the number of licensed moneylenders and analyse the implications of this for the provision of working-class credit.

Type
Research Article
Information
Urban History , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 440 - 462
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Johnson, P., Saving and Spending. The Working-Class Economy in Britain 1970–1939 (Oxford, 1985)Google Scholar; Tebbutt, M., Making Ends Meet. Pawnbroking and Working-Class Credit (Leicester, 1983)Google Scholar; Scott, P.M., ‘The twilight world of inter-war British hire purchase’, Past and Present, 177 (2002), 195–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, P.M. and Walker, J., ‘Working-class household consumption smoothing in inter-war Britain’, Journal of Economic History, 72 (Sep. 2012), 797–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar; O’Connell, S. and Read, C., ‘Working-class consumer credit in the UK, 1925–60: the role of the check trader’, Economic History Review, 57 (2005), 378–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, A., ‘“Funny money”. Hidden charges and repossession: working-class experiences of consumption and credit in the inter-war years’, in Benson, J. and Ugolini, L. (eds.), Cultures of Selling. Perspectives on Consumption and Society since 1700 (Aldershot, 2006)Google Scholar.

2 O’Connell, S., Credit and Community. Working-Class Debt in the UK since 1880 (Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar, see ch. 4.

3 An Act to Amend the Law with Respect to Persons Carrying on Business as Moneylenders, 17 & 18 Geo. 5, c. 21, Jul. 1927.

4 Times, 10 Feb. 1925, 9.

5 An Act to Amend the Law with Respect to Persons Carrying on Business as Moneylenders, 63 & 64 Vict., c. 51, Aug. 1900.

6 An Act for Consolidating, with Amendments, the Acts relating to Pawnbroking in Great Britain, 35 & 36 Vict., c. 93, Aug. 1872.

7 Pawnbroking can be divided into two activities: ‘city pawnbroking’, which concentrates on watches, jewellery and plate, and ‘industrial pawnbroking’, which concentrates on bedding and clothing. Minkes, A.L., ‘The decline of pawnbroking’, Economica, 20 (1953), 12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 How the Casual Labourer Lives, report of the Liverpool Joint Research Committee on the Domestic Condition and Expenditure of the Families of Certain Liverpool Labourers (Liverpool, 1909), v–vii, xv, xv–xix, xxviii. Of the 14 social workers involved in this project, 13 were female, only one of whom was married. See also O’Mara, P., The Autobiography of a Liverpool Irish Slummy (London, 1934)Google Scholar, 66–8; de Vesselitsky, V. and Bulkley, M.E., ‘Money-lending among the London poor’, Sociological Review, 9 (1917), 135–7Google Scholar.

9 This wifely ignorance was also evident in Scotland. Hughes, A., Gender and Political Identities in Scotland, 1919–1939 (Edinburgh, 2010), 144CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Casual Labourer (1909), xii, xiv; Ayers, P., ‘The hidden economy of dockland families: Liverpool in the 1930s’, in Hudson, P. and Lee, W.R. (eds.), Women's Work and the Family Economy in Historical Perspective (Manchester and New York, 1990), 275–6Google Scholar.

11 Ayers, P. and Lambertz, J., ‘Marriage relations, money and domestic violence in working-class Liverpool, 1919–39’, in Lewis, J. (ed.), Women's Experience of Home and Family, 1850–1940 (Oxford, 1986), 196–205Google Scholar; Ayers, P., ‘The making of men: masculinities in inter-war Liverpool’, in Walsh, M. (ed.), Working out Gender. Perspectives from Labour History (Aldershot, 1999), 66–75Google Scholar; see also Ross, E., ‘Survival networks: women's neighbourhood sharing in London before World War 1’, History Workshop Journal, 15 (1983), 4–26Google Scholar.

12 Glazeley, I. and Newell, A., ‘The end of destitution: evidence from urban British working households 1904–37’, Oxford Economic Papers, 64 (2012), 80CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 88.

13 Hanham, F.G., Report of Enquiry into Casual Labour in the Merseyside Area (Liverpool, 1930), 174Google Scholar.

14 Phillips, G. and Whiteside, N., Casual Labour. The Unemployment Question in the Port Transport Industry 1880–1970 (Oxford, 1985), 184–7Google Scholar, 209–22.

15 Hanham, Report of Enquiry, 87–8

16 Caradog Jones, D. (ed.), The Social Survey of Merseyside, 3 vols. (Liverpool, 1934), vol. II, 85–96Google Scholar.

17 P. Ayers, ‘The hidden economy’, 273–5, 277–82; Roberts, E., Women's Work 1840–1940 (London, 1988), 49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Newcome Fox, S., ‘Liverpool’, in Black, C. (ed.), Married Women's Work. Being the Report of an Inquiry Undertaken by the Women's Industrial Council (London, 1915; repr. New York and London, 1980), 177–94Google Scholar.

19 Working-class female networks were vital in Scotland too. Hughes, Gender and Political Identities, 163–4.

20 Times, 10 Feb. 1925, 9; 26 Mar. 1925, 12.

21 Pedersen, S., Eleanor Rathbone and the Politics of Conscience (New Haven and London, 2004), 181Google Scholar.

22 Pedersen, S., ‘Dorothy Clarissa Keeling, 1881–1967’, Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar.

23 Keeling, D.C., The Crowded Stairs. Recollections of Social Work in Liverpool (London, 1961), 13Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., 13, 23–6.

25 Liverpool Record Office (LRO), Liverpool Personal Service Society Archive (LPSSA). The Executive Committee of the Personal Service Society (PSS), meeting in Sep. 1923, instructed Keeling to gather information on moneylending in advance of the October General Committee meeting. Executive Committee, minutes of meeting, 28 Sep. 1923, M364 PSS 1/1/1; General Committee, minutes of meeting, 26 Oct. 1923, M364 PSS 1/1/2.

26 How the Casual Labourer Lives, xv–ix, xxviii.

27 Keeling, Crowded Stairs, 59–69; LRO/LPSSA, Liverpool PSS Annual Report (AR), 1925, 11, M364 PSS 3/1/4.

28 LRO/LPSSA, AR, 1925, 11, M364PSS 3/1/4.

29 Keeling, Crowded Stairs, 111.

30 433% per annum was universally accepted as the annualized rate of interest for one penny in the shilling per week loans. It was presumably calculated by multiplying the weekly rate of 8.333% x 52 = 433%. The compound interest rate is higher: 542%. This might have been more difficult to explain than 433%, which would be a reason why it was not used.

31 Times, 10 Feb. 1925, 9.

32 LRO/LPSSA, AR, 1925, 10, M364 PSS 3/1/4.

33 Report by the Joint Select Committee of the House of Lords and Commons on the Moneylenders Bill and the Moneylenders (Amendment) Bill (London: HMSO, 28 Jul. 1925). For Keeling's evidence, see 19 Jun., paras. 900–44.

34 Times, 20 Jun. 1925, 5.

35 Keeling, The Crowded Stairs, 112.

36 Joint Select Committee, Robert Gee, 24 Jun., para. 1434.

37 Ibid., Col. Watts-Morgan, 17 Jun., para. 369.

38 Ibid., Mr Wells, 17 Jun., paras. 197–8; Fred Ohlsen, 17 Jun., paras. 346–53; Benjamin Astbury, 18 Jun., para. 708.

39 Ibid., Mr R.W. Warnes, 25 Jun., paras. 1483–98.

40 Ibid., Albert Partridge, 17 Jun., paras. 235–9.

41 Times, 10 Feb. 1925, 9; 18 Mar. 1925, 14.

42 Tebbut, Making Ends Meet, 54.

43 O’Connell, Credit and Community, 132–5, 142. A Liberal Jewish Synagogue in London forbade any moneylender to hold an official post in it. Times, 29 Jul. 1925, 5.

44 Times, 2 Dec. 1927, 7; 22 Dec. 1927, 6; 31 Dec. 1927, 7; 10 Jan. 1928, 11.

45 The responsibility for registration was transferred from the commissioners of Customs and Excise to the local authorities in 1949.

46 For legislation details, see Johnson Orchard, D. and May, G., Moneylending in Great Britain (New York, 1933), 115–48Google Scholar; Thorp, L. and Aiken Watson, A., The Law of Moneylending (London, 1928)Google Scholar, 106–4, 115–16.

47 Times, 26 Jun. 1925, 8.

48 48% had the virtue of simplicity but compromised pure mathematical accuracy. Bizley, M.T.L., ‘The rate of interest under the Moneylenders Act 1927’, Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 92 (1966), 340–6Google Scholar.

49 LRO/LPSSA, AR (1927), M364PSS 3/1/6, 11.

50 Thorp and Watson, The Law of Moneylending, 106–8.

51 Orchard and May, Moneylending, 137–8.

52 An illiterate Liverpool moneylender was awarded a certificate, Times, 21 Dec. 1927, 4; another by the Lambeth Police Court, Times, 22 Dec. 1927, 4; an unemployed man awarded a certificate by West Ham Police Court, Times, 12 Aug. 1930, 15; a credit draper was refused a licence on the grounds that he was already in the credit trade, Times, 19 Oct. 1937, 9.

53 The names and addresses of applicants for moneylenders’ certificates in Liverpool from 1934–35 to 1948–49 can be found at LRO 447MAG/11/1.

54 De Vesselitsky and Bulkley, ‘Moneylending’, 132–3.

55 Of 17 people applying for a certificate at the Marylebone Police Court, 13 were female. Times, 17 Aug. 1928, 9; in Glasgow, of the 57 women who applied for certificates, most were married and intended to carry on the business from their own homes. Times, 2 Dec. 1927, 7. A Greenwich magistrate noted the large number of female applicants who ‘seemed respectable and honest, but he doubted their intellectual capacity’. He adjourned their applications for a week to enable the women to become acquainted with the act. Times, 20 Jan. 1928, 5.

56 Mr Stonely to Mr Wilcox, 8 Nov. 1929, The National Archives (TNA), ‘Registration of moneylenders’; McGowan to Pool, 28 Nov. 1929; file note, 26 Sep. 1931, IR40/3555.

57 House of Commons Debates, vol. 223 (1928–29), col. 1732; ibid., vol. 278 (1932–33), col. 1276. On the eve of World War I, there were approximately 6,000–8,000 licensed lenders in Great Britain. Orchard and May, Moneylending in Great Britain, 148.

58 Roberts, E., A Woman's Place. An Oral History of Working-Class Women 1890–1940 (Oxford, 1984), 148–51Google Scholar.

59 Possibly because many of the new council estates were located some distance from the city centre. McKenna, M., ‘The suburbanisation of the working-class population of Liverpool between the wars’, Social History, 16 (1991), 177–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also C. Pooley and S. Irish, The Development of Corporation Housing in Liverpool 1869–1945, Resource Paper of the Centre for North-West Regional Studies (Lancaster, 1984).

60 O’Connell, Credit and Community, 162–5.

61 Times, 12 Aug. 1930, 15.

62 Lenders could agree to debt rescheduling if repayment difficulties were explained by a social worker. LRO/LPSSA, ‘Memories of the Personal Service Society’ (typescript memoirs of Mrs Stapleton, Liverpool, 1930), M364 PSS/11/5.

63 O’Connell, Credit and Community, 162–5.

64 As a ‘Lusitania widow’, Mary Fearon received a weekly Mercantile Marine pension.

65 Dudgeon, J.P., Our Liverpool. Memories of Life in Disappearing Britain (London, 2011), 188–92Google Scholar.

66 Men without Work. A Report Made to the Pilgrim Trust (Cambridge, 1938). This investigation compared social and economic conditions in Blackburn, Crook, Deptford, Leicester, Liverpool and the Rhondda.

67 In 2012, the city had just 466,400 residents.

68 Gazeley, I., Poverty in Britain 1900–1965 (Basingstoke, 2003), 111–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Whiteside, N., ’Counting the cost: sickness and disability among working people in an era of industrial recession, 1920–39’, Economic History Review, 40 (1987), 228–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Men without Work, 90–8.

70 Ibid., 128. See also University of Liverpool, The Social Survey of Liverpool, no. 3, ’Poverty on Merseyside (its association with overcrowding and unemployment)’ (Liverpool, 1931).

71 Caradog Jones, D., Trade Revival in a Depressed Area (Liverpool, 1937), 55–63Google Scholar.

72 Thane, P., ‘The “welfare state” and the labour market’, in Crafts, N., Gazeley, I. and Newell, A. (eds.), Work and Pay in Twentieth-Century Britain (Oxford, 2007), 186–8Google Scholar.

73 Jones, Social Survey, vol. I, 208, 234–8. Chapter 12 contains a fascinating analysis of Merseyside working-class budgets.

74 Ibid., vol. II, 132–4.

75 Times, 7 Jan. 1931, 9; 7 Nov. 1936, 9; 29 Apr. 1937, 9; 1 Sep. 1938, 9.

76 LRO/LPSSA 10th AR (1928), PSS 3/1/7, 10–11.

77 LRO/LPSSA 12th AR (1930), PSS 3/1/9, 10; LPPS 17th Annual Report (Oct. 1934 – Sep. 1935), 3/1/12, 16–17.

78 LRO/LPSSA 19th AR (1 Oct. 1936 – 30 Sep. 1937), LPSS 3/1/13, 28–9; 23rd AR (1 Oct. 1940 – 30 Sep. 1941), PSS 3/1/17, 12.

79 LRO/LPSSA 9th AR (1927), LPSS 3/1/6, 15.

80 TNA, letter from B.J. Hyde, ‘London and Provincial Legal Aid to Moneylenders Licensing Department’, 29 Jun. 1929, IR 40/3555. Didlum was a savings club where savers put aside a sum each week in anticipation of spending on a special event such as Christmas, a wedding or a holiday.

81 TNA, records of the Metropolitan Police Office (MEPO), Detective Sergeant Fairchild to divisional inspector, 3 Feb. 1939; Kate Skillett, statement under caution, 17 Feb. 1939; assistant commissioner to Customs and Excise, 5 Aug. 1939, MEPO 2/4180.

82 Minkes, ‘Decline of pawnbroking’, 19–20. Unfortunately, Minkes does not provide a source for the moneylenders’ licence figure.

83 See Hughes, J., Port in a Storm. The Air Attacks on Liverpool and its Shipping in the Second World War (Birkenhead, 1993)Google Scholar.

84 Statements of Eliza Gregory, Annie Pike, Annie Viney and Annie Allen, all taken on 1 Feb. 1939, MEPO 2/4180, TNA. All were married women who lived in the same block of flats. Mrs Skillett, the lender, lived three miles away.