Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-c65qm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T07:07:27.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perinatal Outcomes Following Selective Fetal Terminations of Complicated Monochorionic Pregnancies: Experience From a Referral Center in Southern Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2025

Melisa De Pauli
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain Fetal Medicine Foundation, London, UK
Pilar Carretero Lucena
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Granada, Spain
Andrea Samper Girona
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Granada, Spain
Olga Ocón Hernández*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Granada, Spain
José Alejandro Ávila Cabreja
Affiliation:
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la investigación Biosanitaria Andalucía Oriental, Granada, Spain
Francisca Sonia Molina
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Granada, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Olga Ocón Hernández; Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to to describe perinatal outcomes in monochorionic twin pregnancies after selective fetal reduction using bipolar cord coagulation (BCC) or interstitial laser ablation (ILA). This retrospective cohort study included monochorionic twin pregnancies requiring selective fetal reduction between 2008 and 2023 at a referral center in Spain. Maternal and perinatal data were collected and analyzed to compare outcomes between BCC and ILA techniques. The primary outcome was the survival of the co-twin, while secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, the incidence of PPROM, birth weight and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Eighty-four procedures were performed (30 ILA, 54 BCC). The overall co-twin survival rate was 80%, with BCC showing a higher survival rate (87%) compared to ILA (67%, p = .026). Fetal death before 24 weeks was more common in ILA (30%) than BCC (7.4%, p = .010). The mean gestational age at delivery was lower in BCC (36.6 weeks) than ILA (38.6 weeks, p = .021), and preterm delivery was more frequent in BCC (50%) compared to ILA (14%, p = .005). BCC seems to have a better overall survival than ILA in complicated monochorionic twins’ selective terminations. However, we could not clarify whether this difference was due to the technique itself or the different gestational age at the time of the procedure as well as the specific indication.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Society for Twin Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chaveeva, P., Poon, L. C., Sotiriadis, A., Kosinski, P., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2014). Optimal method and timing of intrauterine intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: Case study and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 35, 267279. https://doi.org/10.1159/000358593 Google ScholarPubMed
Donepudi, R., Hessami, K., Nassr, A. A., Espinoza, J., Sanz Cortes, M., Sun, L., Shirazi, M., Yinon, Y., Belfort, M. A., & Shamshirsaz, A. A. (2022). Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of different techniques. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 226, 646655.e643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.018 Google ScholarPubMed
Donepudi, R., Hessami, K., Nassr, A. A., Espinoza, J., Cortes, M. S., Belfort, M. A., & Shamshirsaz, A. A. (2022). Co-twin survival after selective fetal reduction in complicated multiple gestations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival rate according to indication for intervention. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 274, 182190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.028 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaerty, K., Greer, R. M., & Kumar, S. (2015). Systematic review and metaanalysis of perinatal outcomes after radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord occlusion in monochorionic pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213, 637643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.035 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanna, M. M., Rustico, M. A., Dell’Avanzo, M., Schena, V., Faiola, S., Consonni, D., Righini, A., Scelsa, B., & Ferrazzi, E. M. (2012). Bipolar cord coagulation for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: 118 consecutive cases at a single center. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 39, 407413. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.11073 Google Scholar
Lewi, L. (2022). Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100501 Google ScholarPubMed
Lewi, L., Cannie, M., Blickstein, I., Jani, J., Huber, A., Hecher, K., Dymarkowski, S., Gratacós, E., Lewi, P., & Deprest, J. (2007). Placental sharing, birthweight discordance, and vascular anastomoses in monochorionic diamniotic twin placentas. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 197, 587.e581587.e588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.009 Google ScholarPubMed
Lewi, L., Valencia, C., Gonzalez, E., Deprest, J., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2010). The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203, 213.e211213.e214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.018 Google ScholarPubMed
Litwinska, E., Syngelaki, A., Cimpoca, B., Frei, L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2020). Outcome of twin pregnancy with two live fetuses at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 55, 3238. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21892 Google ScholarPubMed
Mackie, F. L., Rigby, A., Morris, R. K., & Kilby, M. D. (2019). Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG, 126, 569578. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15530 Google ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. C., & D’Addario, V. (2009). Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: A systematic review of literature. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200, 123129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.039 Google ScholarPubMed
Scheier, M., & Molina, F. S. (2011). Outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence following treatment with interstitial laser: A retrospective study. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 31, 3541. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334156 Google ScholarPubMed
van den Bos, E. M., van Klink, J. M. M., Middeldorp, J. M., Klumper, F. J., Oepkes, D., & Lopriore, E. (2013). Perinatal outcome after selective feticide in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 41, 653658. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12408 Google ScholarPubMed
van Hoek, M. J. C., van Klink, J. M. M., Verweij, E. J. T., Middeldorp, J. M., Haak, M. C., Lopriore, E., & Slaghekke, F. (2023). Perinatal outcome after selective fetal reduction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A comparison of techniques over a 20-year period. Prenatal Diagnosis, 43, 10281035. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6385 Google ScholarPubMed
Yinon, Y., Ashwal, E., Weisz, B., Chayen, B., Schiff, E., & Lipitz, S. (2015). Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic twins: prediction of obstetric outcome and comparison of techniques. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 46, 670677. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14879 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed