Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:44:42.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helping Relationships and Genetic Propensities: A Combinatoric Study of DRD2, Mentoring, and Educational Continuation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Michael J. Shanahan*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States of America. [email protected]
Lance D. Erickson
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah, United States of America.
Stephen Vaisey
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Andrew Smolen
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder, United States of America.
*
*Address for correspondence: Michael Shanahan, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, CB 3210, Hamilton Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3210, USA.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From conception to death, helping relationships promote positive development and enable people to surmount challenges in their lives. Is it the case that the negative consequences of a genetic propensity for risky behaviors can be attenuated by helping relationships (a G × E)? But is it also the case that people with such a genetic propensity are less likely to have helping relationships compared to people without such a propensity (a rGE)? We illustrate this complex pattern of gene–environment interplay by drawing on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and a combinatoric analytic strategy. We focus on a gene associated with dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2 TaqIA), student–mentor relationships, and educational continuation beyond secondary school. Results reveal that, for both white and black males, DRD2 A1+ (A1A1 and A1A2 genotypes) is associated with a decreased likelihood of school continuation compared to their counterparts with DRD2 A1–; mentors who are teachers compensate for this negative association (a G × E); and youth with DRD2 A1+ are less likely to have a mentor who is a teacher than their counterparts with DRD2 A1– (a rGE).

Type
Guest Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007