Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:16:03.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defining discordance in twin studies of risk and protective factors for late life disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Margaret Gatz*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, [email protected]
Nancy L Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Michael Crowe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Amy Fiske
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr Margaret Gatz, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, 3620 McClintock, Los Angeles, California90089-1061, USA. Tel: 213 740 2212; Fax: 213 746 5994

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In studies that employ matched pair analysis to identify environmental exposures important for a disorder, criteria for discordant pairs are seldom discussed. Yet several assumptions concerning the definition of discordancy may have considerable influence over what results are found. Problems are exacerbated when age of onset for a disorder is late in life. We propose a new set of criteria for defining discordant pairs in studies of dementia, taking into account duration of discordance and competing causes of mortality, and evaluate the consequences of choosing alternative definitions of discordancy. Twin Research (2000) 3, 159–164.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000