Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:38:13.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aetiology of teenage childbearing: reasons for familial effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Petra Otterblad Olausson*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute; Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden. [email protected]
Paul Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute.
Sven Cnattingius
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute.
*
*Correspondence: Petra Otterblad Olausson, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, PO Box 281, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel: + 46 8 728 61 29; Fax: + 46 8 31 49 57

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the contribution of the genetic and environmental factors to the risk of teenage childbearing, and to study whether life style, socio-economic conditions, and personality traits could explain possible familial effects. We linked two population-based registers: the Swedish Twin Register and the Swedish Medical Birth Register. The study covers female twin pairs born between 1953 and 1958, having their first infant before the age of 30 years (n = 1885). In order to separate familial effects from other environmental influences, and genetic effects from shared environmental effects, only complete twin pairs with known zygosity were included, in all 260 monozygotic and 370 dizygotic twin pairs. We used quantitative genetic analyses to evaluate the importance of genetic and environmental effects for liability to teenage childbearing. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the effects of life style, socio-economic situation, and personality on the probability of teenage childbearing, and to study whether psychosocial factors could explain possible familial effects. Fifty-nine percent (0–76%) of the variance in being a teenage mother was attributable to heritable factors; 0% (0–49%) was due to shared environmental factors; and 41% (23–67%) was explained by non-shared environmental factors. Thus, the data were consistent with the hypothesis that the familial aggregation of teenage childbearing is completely explained by genetic factors, although the alternative hypothesis that familial aggregation is entirely explained by shared environmental factors cannot be ruled out. Significant effects of smoking habits, housing conditions, and educational level were found in relation to liability to teenage childbearing. However, the familial effects on risk of teenage childbearing were not mediated through similarities in life style and socio-economic factors. When studying risk factors for teenage childbearing, it is recommended to include life style and socio-economic variables as well as information about family history of teenage childbearing. Twin Research (2000) 3, 23–27.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000