Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T01:06:41.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Rules as Strict as Palestrina's’: The Regulation of Pitch and Rhythm in Ligeti's Requiem and Lux aeterna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2013

BENJAMIN R. LEVY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

György Ligeti has stated that his micropolyphonic compositions were ‘governed by rules as strict as Palestrina's’ (Ligeti 1983, 14); some of these rules are preserved directly in his sketches and others can be derived from the compositions themselves. This article discusses the artistic context in which Ligeti developed systems of rules for individual compositions, and investigates in depth the composer's rules for the organization of pitch and rhythm in two of his seminal works from the 1960s, transmitting the explicit rules for pitch in sketches for the ‘De die judicii’ movement of the Requiem and uncovering implicit rules for rhythm in Lux aeterna. By examining both the rules and their application in composition, with the exceptions that arise therein, we come to a better understanding of the aesthetic goals Ligeti's rules were devised to meet, and the balance of stricture and freedom that was essential to the composer's persona.

Type
Articles
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , September 2013 , pp. 203 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, Jonathan. ‘Inaudible Structures, Audible Music: Ligeti's Problem, and his Solution.’ Music Analysis 6/3 (1987): 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Jonathan. ‘Voice Leading as a Spatial Function in the Music of Ligeti.’ Music Analysis 13, 2/3 (1994): 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Jonathan. ‘Rules and Regulation: Lessons from Ligeti's Compositional Sketches,’ in György Ligeti: of Foreign Lands and Strange Sounds, Duchesneau, Louise and Marx, Wolfgang, eds., 149–67. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Boulez, Pierre. ‘Schoenberg is Dead,’ in Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship, ed., Thévenin, Paule, trans., Walsh, Stephen, 209–214. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Clendinning, Jane Piper. ‘Contrapuntal Techniques in the Music of György Ligeti.’ Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1989.Google Scholar
Clendinning, Jane Piper. ‘Structural Factors in the Microcanonic Compositions of György Ligeti’ in Concert Music, Rock, and Jazz since 1945: Essays and Analytical Studies, ed. Marvin, Elizabeth West and Hermann, Richard, 229–256. Rochester NY: University of Rochester Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dibelius, Ulrich. György Ligeti: eine Monographie in Essays. Mainz: Schott, 1994.Google Scholar
Dubiel, Joseph. ‘‘When you are a Beethoven:’ Kinds of Rules in Schenker's ‘Counterpoint.’’ Journal of Music Theory 34/2 (1990): 291–340.Google Scholar
Gottwald, Clytus. ‘Lux aeterna: ein Beitrag zur Kopositionstechnik György Ligetis.’ Musica 25/1 (1971): 12–17.Google Scholar
Jarvlepp, Jan. ‘Pitch and Texture Analysis of Ligeti's Lux Aeterna’ in ex tempore 2/1 (1982), 16–32, accessed through http://www.ex-tempore.org/jarvlepp/jarvlepp.htm, March 12, 2012.Google Scholar
Jarry, Alfred. The Ubu Plays, trans. Connolly, Cyril and Taylor, Simon Watson. New York: Grove Weidenfield, 1969.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, Knud. The Style of Palestrina and the Dissonance, trans. Hamerik, Margaret W.. London: Oxford University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, Knud. 1992. Counterpoint: The Polyphonic Vocal Style of the Sixteenth Century, trans. Haydon, Glen. New York: Dover Publications. Reprint of the 1939 Prentice-Hall edition.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Harald. Von innen und aussen, ed. Grünzweig, Werner and Krieger, Gottfried. Hofheim: Wolke Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Levy, Benjamin R. ‘Shades of the Studio: Electronic Influences on Ligeti's Apparitions.’ Perspectives of New Music 47/2 (2009): 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligeti, György. ‘Pierre Boulez: Decision and Automatism in Structure 1a,’ trans. Black, Leo, in Die Reihe 4, Young Composers, 36–62. Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania: T. Presser and London: Universal Edition, 1960 (German edition, 1958).Google Scholar
Ligeti, György. ‘Metamorphoses of Musical Form’ trans. Cardew, Cornelius, in Die Reihe 7, Form – Space, 5–19. Bryn Mawr: Theodore Presser, 1965 (German edition 1960).Google Scholar
Ligeti, György. Ligeti in Conversation, trans., Schabert, Gabor J., et al.London: Ernst Eulenburg, Ltd., 1983.Google Scholar
Ligeti, György. ‘Träumen Sie in Farbe?’: Gÿorgy Ligeti im Gespräch mit Eckhard Roelcke. Vienna: Paul Zsolnay Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Ligeti, György. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 2, ed. Lichtenfeld, Monika. Mainz: Schott, 2007.Google Scholar
Michel, Pierre. György Ligeti: Compositeur d'aujourd'hui. Paris: Minerve, 1985.Google Scholar
Roig-Francolí, Miguel. ‘Harmonic and Formal Processes in Ligeti's Net-Structure Compositions.’ Music Theory Spectrum 17/2 (1995): 242–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbe, Herman. ‘Techniques médiévales en musique contemporaine: histoire de la musique et sens culturel.’ Revue belge de Musicologie 34/35 (1980/81): 220–33.Google Scholar
Sabbe, Herman. György Ligeti: Studien zur kompositorischen Phänomenologie, Musik-Konzepte 53, series eds., Metzger, Heinz-Klaus and Riehn, Rainer. Munich: edition text+kritik, 1987.Google Scholar
Salmenhaara, Erkki. Das musikalische Material und seine Behandlung in den Werken ‘Apparitions,’ ‘Atmospheres,’ und ‘Requiem’ von György Ligeti. Regensburg: Gustav Bosse Verlag, 1969.Google Scholar
Steinitz, Richard. György Ligeti: Music of the Imagination. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Wilson, Charles. ‘György Ligeti and the Rhetoric of Autonomy.’ Twentieth Century Music 1/1 (2004): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar