No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Orality and Rhetoric in Scelsi's Music
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2011
Abstract
In his later music Giacinto Scelsi rejected the mediation of notation, improvising his works and viewing the scores, produced mostly by assistants, as a mere record. But to what extent did he really transcend the ‘tyranny of writing’ and how might one demonstrate this? Critics have tended to echo the composer in reducing the problem to an opposition between writing and sound per se. In this article I discuss the limitations of this view and propose a more structural approach, using in particular the analysis of Walter Ong. I argue that Scelsi's idiom, while novel in its extreme economy of means, uses these means in such a way as to restore a traditional sense of musical ‘grammar’. I illustrate the rhetorical versatility of this grammar by contrasting the two apparently similar movements of the Duo of 1965.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
Ancona, Solange. ‘Canti del Capricorno’, in Giacinto Scelsi: viaggio al centro, ed. Castanet, and Cisternino, . 132–150.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christine. ‘Klang als Energie: Anahit von Giacinto Scelsi’. MusikTexte 81–2 (1999), 72–82.Google Scholar
Angermann, Klaus, ed. Giacinto Scelsi, im Inners des Tons: Symposion Giacinto Scelsi Hamburg 1992. Hofheim: Wolke, 1993.Google Scholar
Baroni, Mario. ‘Musical Grammar and the Study of Cognitive Processes of Composition’. Musicae Scientiae 3/1 (1999), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béthune, Christian. ‘Le jazz comme oralité seconde’. L'homme 171–2 (2004), 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulez, Pierre. ‘The Musician Writes: for the Eyes of the Deaf?’, trans. Samuels, Robert, in The Pleasure of Modernist Music, ed. Ashby, Arved. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 1994. 197–222.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, Giulio. ‘Suono e processo nei “Quattro pezzi per orchestra (ciascuno su una nota sola) (1959)” di Giacinto Scelsi’, in Giacinto Scelsi: viaggio, ed. Castanet, and Cisternino, . 246–259.Google Scholar
Castanet, Pierre-Albert. ‘Ambiguità e ambivalenza dell’originale suono di Giacinto Scelsi', in Giacinto Scelsi: viaggio, ed. Castanet, and Cisternino, . 41–60.Google Scholar
–––––, and Cisternino, Nicola, eds. Giacinto Scelsi: viaggio al centro del suono. La Spezia: Luna, 1993.Google Scholar
Cisternino, Nicola. ‘Cercle Scelsi 1994’. I suoni, le onde … Rivista della Fondazione Isabella Scelsi [Rome] 5 (1994), 13.Google Scholar
Colangelo, William. ‘The Composer-Performer Paradigm in Giacinto Scelsi's Solo Works’. PhD diss., New York University, 1996.Google Scholar
Cremonese, Adriano, ed. Giacinto Scelsi. Rome: Nuova Consonanza / Parole Gelate, 1985.Google Scholar
Cremonese, Adriano. Giacinto Scelsi: prassi compositiva e riflessione teorica fino alla metà degli anni '40. Palermo: L'Epos, 1992.Google Scholar
Di Giacomo, Andrea. ‘Il suono scomposto’. Tesi di laurea, Università di Bologna, 2005.Google Scholar
Drott, Eric. ‘Class, Ideology and il caso Scelsi’. Musical Quarterly 89/1 (2006), 80–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, John Miles. The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methodology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. The Singer of Tales in Performance. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 1995.Google Scholar
Freeman, Robin. ‘Tanmatras: the Life and Work of Giacinto Scelsi’. Tempo 176 (1991), 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Luke O. ‘Literacy, Orality and the Parry–Lord “Formula”: Improvisation and the Afro-American Jazz Tradition’. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 22/2 (1991), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuriati, Giovanni. ‘Suono, improvvisazione, trascrizione, autorialità, Oriente, … e Scelsi. Alcune riflessioni di un etnomusicologo’, in Giacinto Scelsi nel centenario della nascita, ed. Tortora. 263–79.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Interface between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Halbreich, Harry. ‘Analisi di Konx-Om-Pax di Giacinto Scelsi’, in Giacinto Scelsi: viaggio, ed. Castanet and Cisternino. 184–97.Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. The Work of Music and the Problem of Its Identity, trans. Czerniawski, Adam. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaecker, Friedrich. ‘“Der Dilettant und die Profis”: Giacinto Scelsi, Vieri Tosatti & Co.’. MusikTexte 104 (2005), 27–40.Google Scholar
Kanno, Mieko. ‘Thoughts on How to Play in Tune: Pitch and Intonation’. Contemporary Music Review 22/1–2 (2003), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred. ‘Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems’, in Generative Processes in Music, ed. Sloboda. 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Albert. The Singer of Tales (1960), 2nd edn, ed. Mitchell, Stephen and Nagy, Gregory. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mallet, Frank, Mazzoni, Marie-Cécile, and Texier, Marc. ‘Conversations avec Giacinto Scelsi’, in Scelsi, Les anges sont ailleurs …, 62–84. Transcript of Radio France / France-Musique broadcast, 1987.Google Scholar
Mastropietro, Alessandro. ‘Action music (1955) … action painting: su un nodo della produzione pianistica di Scelsi e su alcune ipotesi definitorie della sua tecnica compositiva’, in Giacinto Scelsi nel centenario della nascita, ed. Tortora. 119–144.Google Scholar
Menke, Johannes. Pax, Analyse bei Giacinto Scelsi: Tre canti sacri und Konx-Om-Pax. Hofheim: Wolke, 2004.Google Scholar
Menke, Johannes. ‘La nuova concezione della tonalità di Scelsi’, in Giacinto Scelsi nel centenario della nascita, ed. Tortora. 55–60.Google Scholar
Metzger, Heinz-Klaus. ‘Das Unbekannte in der Musik’, in Giacinto Scelsi, ed. Metzger and Riehn. 10–23.Google Scholar
––––, and Riehn, Rainer, eds. Giacinto Scelsi. Musik-Konzepte 31. Munich: text + kritik, 1983.Google Scholar
Molino, Jean. ‘Che cos’è l'oralità musicale?', in Enciclopedia della Musica, ed. Nattiez, Jean-Jacques, Bent, Margaret, Dalmonte, Rossana, and Baroni, Mario. Turin: Einaudi, 2005. 367–413.Google Scholar
Murail, Tristan. ‘Scelsi, de-compositore’, in Giacinto Scelsi: viaggio, ed. Castanet, and Cisternino, . 83–90. Trans. Hasegawa, Robert in Contemporary Music Review 24/1–2 (2005), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murail, Tristan. ‘Scelsi, l'Itinéraire: l'exploration du son’, Journal de Royaumont 2 (1988). Trans. Hasegawa, Robert in Contemporary Music Review 24/1–2 (2005), 181–185.Google Scholar
MusikTexte 81–2 (1999; Scelsi double issue, ed. Gisela Gronemeyer and Reinhard Oehlschlägel).Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Rhetoric, Romance and Technology: Studies in the Interaction of Expression and Culture. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Pelé, Gérard. ‘Modélisation de l’intensité dans la musique semi-improvisée: l'exemple de Giacinto Scelsi', in Les universaux en musique: actes du quatrième congrès international sur la signification musicale, ed. Miereanu, Costin and Hascher, Xavier. Paris: Sorbonne, 1998. 447–463.Google Scholar
Piras, Elisabetta, Baroni, Mario, and Zanarini, Gianni. ‘Improvvisazioni di Giacinto Scelsi: il caso problematico dell’ondiola'. … i suoni, le onde … Rivista della Fondazione Isabella Scelsi [Rome] 19–20 (2007–8), 3–9.Google Scholar
Pressing, Jeff. ‘Cognitive Processes in Improvisation’, in Cognitive Processes in the Perception of Art, ed. Crozier, W. R. and Chapman, A. J.. Advances in Psychology 19. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984. 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressing, Jeff. ‘Improvisation: Methods and Models’, in Generative Processes in Music, ed. Sloboda. 129–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reish, Gregory. ‘The Transformation of Giacinto Scelsi's Musical Style and Aesthetics, 1929–1959’. PhD diss., University of Georgia, 2001.Google Scholar
Reish, Gregory. ‘Una nota sola: Giacinto Scelsi and the Genesis of Music on a Single Note’. Journal of Musicological Research 25 (2006), 149–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scelsi, Giacinto. Les anges sont ailleurs…, ed. Kanach, Sharon, trans. Kanach, and others. Arles: Actes Sud, 2006.Google Scholar
Scelsi, Giacinto. ‘Force cosmique’, in Les anges sont ailleurs … . 151–3.Google Scholar
Scelsi, Giacinto. ‘La puissance cosmique du Son’, in Les anges sont ailleurs … . 149–50.Google Scholar
Scelsi, Giacinto. ‘Remarques sur la composition’, in Les anges sont ailleurs … . 175–7.Google Scholar
Scelsi, Giacinto. ‘Son et musique’, ed. Luciano Martinis, in Les anges sont ailleurs … . 125–39.Google Scholar
Schatt, Peter W. ‘Informelle Formen: Giacinto Scelsis Pranam II als Musik objektivierte Intuition’, in Neue Musik vermitteln: Analysen – Interpretation – Unterricht. Mainz: Schott, 2004. 141–153.Google Scholar
Sloboda, John, ed. Generative Processes in Music: the Psychology of Performance, Composition and Improvisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles L. ‘The Large Ensemble Works of Giacinto Scelsi and the Influence of Western and Non-Western Traditions: an Analysis of I Presagi’. DMA thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2005.Google Scholar
Thein, Wolfgang. ‘Botschaft und Konstruktion: nichtimprovisierte Momente in der Musik Giacinto Scelsis’, in Giacinto Scelsi, im Inners des Tons, ed. Angermann. 51–68.Google Scholar
Tortora, Daniela. ‘“Le voci del mondo”: genesi, scrittura e interpretazione dei Canti del Capricorno ’. Il Saggiatore Musicale 11/1 (2004), 111–142.Google Scholar
Tortora, Daniela, ed. Giacinto Scelsi nel centenario della nascita: atti dei convegni internazionali: Roma, 9–10 dicembre 2005; Palermo, 16 gennaio 2006. Rome: Aracne, 2008.Google Scholar
Tosatti, Vieri. ‘Scelsi, c’est moi'. Il giornale della musica 25 (January 1989), 1, 10.Google Scholar
Treitler, Leo. ‘Oral, Written, and Literate Process in the Transmission of Medieval Music’. Speculum Musicae 56/3 (1981), 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uitti, Frances-Marie. ‘Preserving the Scelsi Improvisations’. Tempo 194 (1995), 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdess, Richard. ‘The Oral in Writing: Early Indian Musical Notations’. Early Music 24/3 (1996), 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenck, Martin. ‘Das Irreduktible als Kriterium der Avantgarde’, in Giacinto Scelsi, ed. Metzger and Riehn. 67–81. It. trans. in Giacinto Scelsi, ed. Cremonese. 75–90.Google Scholar