Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:05:51.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘How We Were Never Posthuman’: Technologies of the Embodied Voice in Pamela Z's Voci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2021

G. DOUGLAS BARRETT Open the ORCID record for G. DOUGLAS BARRETT [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses composer Pamela Z's work in light of critiques of posthumanism from Black studies and sound/music studies. Z's large-scale multimedia work Voci (2003), which the artist describes as a ‘polyphonic mono-opera’, consists of a series of eighteen scenes that combine vocal performance with digital video and audio processing. Z manipulates these sources using the BodySynth, an alternate controller interface that converts bodily gestures into expressive control signals. Z's work has been considered through cyborgian, Afrofuturist, and posthumanist discourses. But rather than affirm her practice as fully consonant with technological visions of the posthuman, I argue that she challenges the very liberal humanism upon which the posthuman is built. For a key tenet of liberal humanism, as Alexander G. Weheliye observes, was the racial and gendered apportionment of humanity into full humans, not-quite-humans, and non-humans. We have never been completely human, he suggests, let alone posthuman.

Z uses technologies of the embodied voice to confront both the posthuman imaginary and the continued effects of its ideological preconditions in racio-colonial liberal humanism. In a Voci scene entitled ‘Voice Studies’, for instance, Z engages the problem of ‘linguistic profiling’ as it applies to housing discrimination, citing the work of Stanford linguistics researcher John Baugh. Against a backdrop of percussive vocalizations, Z explains, ‘Studies reveal that people can often infer the race of an individual based on the sound of their voice’, subsequently playing back recordings of housing applicants containing vocal signifiers of racial difference. The article then contrasts this kind of ‘aural dimension of race’ found in Jennifer Lynn Stoever's notion of the ‘sonic color line’ with Pierre Schaeffer's attempt to separate sound from the social – as well as from bodies and identities – in his practice of acousmatic reduction. With this in mind, I show how Z construes the voice as an acous(ma)tic technology of embodiment while reframing opera's humanist legacy through Voci's allegorical narration of the ‘prehuman’, ‘human’, and ‘posthuman’. Moving with and against a posthuman imaginary, Z suggests that although we have never quite been human or posthuman, we may nevertheless narrate new versions of each.

Type
Article
Information
Twentieth-Century Music , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 3 - 27
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbate, Carolyn. In Search of Opera. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
André, Naomi. Black Opera: History, Power, Engagement. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Auner, Joseph. ‘“Sing It for Me”: Posthuman Ventriloquism in Recent Popular Music’. Journal of the Royal Musical Association 128/1 (2003), 98–122.Google Scholar
Barrett, G. Douglas. ‘The Brain at Work: Cognitive Labor and the Posthuman Brain in Alvin Lucier's Music for Solo Performer’. Postmodern Culture 27/3 (2018). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/688621 (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Barrett, Lindon. Blackness and Value: Seeing Double. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, John. ‘Linguistic Profiling’, in Black Linguistics: Language, Society and Politics in Africa and the Americas, ed. Ball, Arnetha, Makoni, Sinfree, Smitherman, Geneva, and Spears, Arthur K.. New York: Routledge, 2003. 155–68.Google Scholar
Bebey, Francis. African Music: A People's Art. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
BodySynth. ‘The BodySynth | History’. www.thebodysynth.com/history (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
BodySynth. ‘The BodySynth Specifications Summary’. https://web.archive.org/web/20160303052323/http://www.synthzone.com/bsynth.html (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.Google Scholar
Brookes, Stephen. ‘Pamela Z at the Tivoli’, Washington Post, 15 May 2007. Performing Arts Section, 2 (C).Google Scholar
Burton, Justin Adams. Posthuman Rap. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, Richard A. ‘Florentine Humanism and the Birth of Opera: The Roots of Operatic “Conventions”’. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 31/1 (2000), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascone, Kim. ‘The Aesthetics of Failure: “Post-Digital” Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music’. Computer Music Journal 24/4 (2000), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chion, Michel. Audio-Vision: Sound of Screen, trans. Gorbman, Claudia. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Chow, Rey. ‘Listening After “Acousmaticity”: Notes on a Transdisciplinary Problematic’, in Sound Objects, ed. Steintrager, James A. and Chow, Rey. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2018. 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Hannah, Gutkin, David, and Vágnerová, Lucie. ‘A Chronology’, in Technology and the Diva: Sopranos, Opera, and Media from Romanticism to the Digital Age, ed. Henson, Karen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 1–10.Google Scholar
Clarke, Bruce. Narrative and Neocybernetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornago, Noé. ‘Schaeffer, Boulez, and the Everyday Diplomacies of French Decolonization’, in International Relations, Music and Diplomacy: Sounds and Voices on the International Stage, ed. Ramel, Frédéric and Prévost-Thomas, Cécile. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dery, Mark. ‘Black to the Future: Interviews with Samuel R. Delany, Greg Tate, and Tricia Rose’. South Atlantic Quarterly 94/4 (1993), 735–78.Google Scholar
Dolar, Mladen. ‘The Birth of Opera from the Spirit of Absolutism’, in Slavoj Žižek and Mladen Dolar, Opera's Second Death. New York: Routledge, 2002. 5–7.Google Scholar
Dolar, Mladen. A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folk. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2015 (1903).Google Scholar
Dyson, Frances. Sounding New Media: Immersion and Embodiment in the Arts and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidsheim, Nina Sun. ‘Marian Anderson and “Sonic Blackness” in American Opera’. American Quarterly 63/3 (2011), 641–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Cristin. Antebellum Posthuman: Race and Materiality in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York: Fordham University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshun, Kodwo. More Brilliant than the Sun: Adventures in Sonic Fiction. London: Quartet Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Goehr, Lydia. ‘The Domestic Diva: Toward an Operatic History of the Telephone’, in Technology and the Diva: Sopranos, Opera, and Media from Romanticism to the Digital Age, ed. Henson, Karen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 104–23.Google Scholar
Golumbia, David. The Cultural Logic of Computation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, J. Jack and Livingston, Ira, eds. Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. ‘Companions in Conversation [with Cary Wolfe]’, in Manifestly Haraway. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2016. 199–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’. Socialist Review 80 (1985), 65–108.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, Karen. ‘Introduction: Of Modern Operatic Mythologies and Technologies’, in Technology and the Diva: Sopranos, Opera, and Media from Romanticism to the Digital Age, ed. Henson, Karen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 11–23.Google Scholar
Hester, Helen. ‘Technically Female: Women, Machines, and Hyperemployment’. Salvage, 8 August 2016. http://salvage.zone/in-print/technically-female-women-machines-and-hyperemployment/ (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman. ‘Outer Worlds: Persistence of Race in Movement “Beyond the Human”’. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21/2–3 (2015), 215–18.Google Scholar
Kane, Brian. Sound Unseen: Acousmatic Sound in Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Jennifer. ‘Pamela Z’, in In Her Own Words: Conversations with Composers in the United States. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2013. 211–27.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Kathy. ‘A Few Facets of Pamela Z’, MusicWorks 76 (Spring 2000), www.pamelaz.com/musicworks.html (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter, trans. Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey and Wutz, Michael. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford, 1999.Google Scholar
Leman, Marc, Lesaffre, Micheline, and Maes, Pieter-Jan. ‘Introduction: What is Embodied Music Interaction?’, in The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction, ed. Leman, Marc, Lesaffre, Micheline, and Maes, Pieter-Jan. New York: Routledge, 2017. 1–10.Google Scholar
Lewis, George E. ‘Improvised Music after 1950: Afrological and Eurological Perspectives’. Black Music Research Journal 16/1 (1996), 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, George E. ‘Too Many Notes: Complexity and Culture in Voyager’. Leonardo Music Journal 10 (2000), 33–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, George E. ‘The Virtual Discourses of Pamela Z’. Journal of the Society for American Music 1/1 (2007), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lydia H. ‘The Neurotic Machine’, in The Freudian Robot: Digital Media and the Future of the Unconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. 230–8.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C.B. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1980).Google Scholar
Lyon, Eric and Z, Pamela. ‘Interview with Pamela Z’. Seamus Online, 28 July 2016. www.seamusonline.org/interview-with-pamela-z/ (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. What Animals Teach Us about Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
McKittrick, Katherine. ‘Yours in the Intellectual Struggle’, in On Being Human as Praxis, ed. McKittrick, Katherine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015. 1–8.Google Scholar
Midgette, Anne. ‘Music Review: An Encyclopedia of Voices, Human and Otherwise’. New York Times, 30 October 2004, National Edition. Arts Section (sec. B), 11.Google Scholar
Mills, Mara. On the Phone: Hearing Loss and Communication Engineering. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Moten, Fred. In the Break: The Aesthetics of the Black Radical Tradition. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alondra, ed. ‘Afrofuturism’, Social Text 71 (2002).Google Scholar
Neumark, Norie. ‘Animal Tracks: Affect, Aesthetics, Ethics’, in Voicetracks: Attuning to Voice in Media and the Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017. 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Charissa. ‘Recoding the Voice: Experimental Singing after “Extended Vocal Techniques” in the Electroacoustic Performance of Pamela Z’. Paper presented at the conference After Experimental Music, Ithaca, NY, February 2018.Google Scholar
Obadike, Mendi. ‘Low Fidelity: Stereotyped Blackness in the Field of Sound’. PhD diss., Duke University, 2005.Google Scholar
Parisi, Luciana. ‘AI (Artificial Intelligence)’, in Posthuman Glossary, ed. Braidotti, Rosi and Hlavajova, Maria. New York: Bloomsbury, 2018. 21–2.Google Scholar
Pettman, Dominic, ‘The Cybernetic Voice’, in Sonic Intimacy: Voice, Species, Technics (or, How To Listen to the World) (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Jennifer. ‘Caring: Care Labor, Conversational Artificial Intelligence, and Disembodied Women’, in The Robotic Imaginary: The Human and the Price of Dehumanized Labor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2018. 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Tara. Pamela Z’, in Pink Noises: Women on Electronic Music and Sound. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, David. Why Birds Sing: A Journey Into the Mystery of Bird Song. New York: Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Pierre. In Search of a Concrete Music, trans. North, Christine and Dack, John. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Pierre. Treatise on Musical Objects: An Essay Across Disciplines. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Sellar, Tom. ‘Parts of Speech: Interview with Pamela Z’. Theater Magazine 30/2 (2000). www.pamelaz.com/theater.html (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Silverman, Kaja. The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, Sidonie and Watson, Julia. ‘Introduction’, in De/Colonizing the Subject: The Politics of Gender in Women's Autobiography, ed. Smith, Sidonie and Watson, Julia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Spillers, Hortense J. ‘Mama's Baby, Papa's Maybe: An American Grammar Book’. Diacritics 17/2 (1987), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanyek, Jason and Piekut, Benjamin, ‘Deadness: Technologies of the Intermundane’. TDR: The Drama Review 54/1 (2010), 14–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoever, Jennifer Lynn. ‘Fine-Tuning the Sonic Color-line: Radio and the Acousmatic Du Bois’. Modernist Cultures 10/1 (2015), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoever, Jennifer Lynn. The Sonic Color Line: Race and the Cultural Politics of Listening. New York: New York University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, Rosalyn. And So I Sing: African-American Divas in Opera and Concert. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 1990.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Atau. ‘Embodied Musical Interaction: Body Physiology, Cross Modality, and Sonic Experience’, in New Directions in Music and Human-Computer Interaction, ed. Holland, Simon, Mudd, Tom, Wilkie-McKenna, Katie, McPherson, Andrew, and Wanderley, Marcelo M.. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019. 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vágnerová, Lucie, ‘Composed Instruments, Failing Circuits: Out-of-Control Controllers and the Theatricality of Latency’. Paper presented at the conference After Experimental Music, Ithaca, NY, February 2018.Google Scholar
Vágnerová, Lucie. ‘Sirens/Cyborgs: Sound Technologies and the Musical Body’. PhD diss., Columbia University, 2016.Google Scholar
Valiquet, Patrick. ‘Hearing the Music of Others: Pierre Schaeffer's Humanist Interdiscipline’. Music and Letters 98/2 (2017), 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weheliye, Alexander G. ‘“Feenin”: Posthuman Voices in Contemporary Black Popular Music’. Social Text 20/2 (2002), 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weheliye, Alexander G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Weheliye, Alexander G. Phonographies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Weiser, Mark. ‘The Computer for the 21st Century’. Scientific American 265 (September 1991), 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizenbaum, Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, reissue of 1961 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Wilson, Elizabeth. ‘Artificial Psychotherapy’, in Affect and Artificial Intelligence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2010. 83–108.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Cary. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Cary. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wynter, Sylvia. ‘The Ceremony Found: Towards the Autopoetic Turn/Overturn, its Autonomy of Human Agency and Extraterritoriality of (Self-)Cognition’, in Black Knowledges/Black Struggles: Essays in Critical Epistemology, ed. Ambroise, Jason R. and Broeck, Sabine. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2015. 184–252.Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. Interview by the author. Skype, 28 May 2018. (On Voci and other compositions.)Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. ‘Pamela Z's Voci’. www.pamelaz.com/voci.html (accessed 28 May 2018).Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. ‘Pamela Z, Voci, Libretto and Stage Directions’. Last Letter Music – ASCAP, 2003/2004 (Kitchen 2004 Version).Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. Voci (performance). The Kitchen, 28–30 October 2004. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. Voci (performance). ODC Theater, 27–29 March, 3–5 April 2003. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. Programme note on Voci. The Kitchen, New York, 28–30 October 2004.Google Scholar
Pamela, Z. Programme note on Voci. ODC Theater, 27–29 March, 3–5 April 2003. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar