Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:02:06.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards the Poor Theatre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2021

Extract

I am a bit impatient when asked, “What is the origin of your experimental theatre productions?” The assumption seems to be that “experimental” work is tangential (toying with some “new” technique each time) and tributary. The result is supposed to be a contribution to modern staging—scenography using current sculptural or electronic ideas, contemporary music, actors independently projecting clownish or cabaret stereotypes. I know that scene: I used to be part of it. Our Theatre Lab productions are going in another direction. In the first place, we are trying to avoid eclecticism, trying to resist thinking of theatre as a composite of disciplines. We are seeking to define what is distinctively theatre, what separates this activity from other categories of performance and spectacle. Secondly, our productions are detailed investigations of the actor-audience relationship. That is, we consider the spiritual and scenic technique of the actor as the core of theatre art.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Tulane Drama Review 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

TDR readers are already familiar with Jerzy Grotowski and his Polish Theatre Lab. Grotowski's mise-en-scène for Marlowe's Doctor Faustus was printed in T24 and a full account of the Theatre Lab appeared in T27. In the next issue we will publish an article about Kathakali—an actor training-method practiced for centuries in southern India and an important influence on Grotowski.

The Editor