Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:51:13.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stanislavski and the Playwright

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2022

Robert W. Corrigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

No name in acting is accorded the reverence by the American theatre as is Stanislavski's. He has been the high priest of American acting since the 1930's when the Group Theatre incorporated his system into their program; and today, a modified Stanislavski System is central to the “Method” of the Actor's Studio. Whether this great regard for Stanislavski has been a good thing for our theatre is much debated, but very little has been said about the effect of Stanislavski's System upon the way the actor approaches the written text of a play. It is time this be considered, for the effects have been insidious and may well have been harmful to the art of our theatre.

Type
Research Article
Information
Tulane Drama Review , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , February 1958 , pp. 62 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 The Tulane Drama Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Footnotes

1 Clurman, Harold, “Founders of the Modern Theatre,” Theatre Workshop I, 1937. p. 75.Google Scholar

2 K., Stanislavski, An Actor Prepares, New York, 1936. p. 18.Google Scholar

3 Ibid. pp. 294-5.

4 Houghton, Norris, Moscow Rehearsals, New York, 1936. p. 75.Google Scholar

5 Stanislavski, Op. Cit., p.126.

6 K., Stanislavski, My Life In Art, New York, 1956. pp. 347-8; 373-4.Google Scholar

7 D., Magarshack, Chehkov: A Life, New York, 1952. pp. 371-2.Google Scholar

8 Stanislavski, Op. Cit., pp. 354-5; 358.

9 Magarshack, Op. Cit., p. 359.

10 Ibid. p. 339.

11 Ibid. p. 332.

12 Stanislavski, Op.Cit, p. 348.

13 Magarshack, Op. Cit, p. 382.

14 Stanislavski, Op.Cit, p. 355.

15 Stanislavskis' system, if carried to its logical conclusion, would require that each actor have absolutely no knowledge of the other characters, and that in an ideal production each actor would be trained individually and then all would be brought together on the stage for the first time on opening night. The validity of this conclusion is based upon the fact that the moment an actor uses the other roles in the play to assist him in creating his part he is no longer being true to nature but is taking into account formal considerations which are not natural but artistic.

16 T. S., Eliot, “Rhetoric and Poetic Drama,” Selected Essays, New York, 1932. p. 28.Google Scholar