Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T09:42:21.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Dramatic Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2022

Extract

I USE this title, because not only is Sartre a philosophical dramatist, but he is also a dramatic philosopher. I mean, that when he philosophizes he dramatizes his philosophical concepts. You cannot fully understand his philosophical drama unless you have an inkling of his dramatic philosophy. That is why when “existentialism” was all the rage in France (and elsewhere) about eleven years ago, but of course nobody had read L'Etre et le Néant, it was possible to get such a totally wrong idea of what Sartre was trying to do. (You will remember the story he himself tells of the young woman who utters a rude word and then exclaims “Ah, je crois que je deviens existentialiste.“) I must start, therefore, with the briefest account of his philosophical system, for the sake of those unfamiliar with it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 The Tulane Drama Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A lecture delivered at Carleton College, 9 May 1957.

References

1 “L'Etre et le Néant,” p. 675 ff.

2 “Ibid.,” p. 404.

3 “Situations” I., Feb., 1939.

4 “The Psychology of Imagination” (L'Imaginaire), pp. 267-71.

5 “Les Mouches,” pp. 99 ff.

6 “L'Etre et le Néant,” pp. 463 ff.

7 It was pointed out to me in discussion that in Sartre's “Les Jeux sont Faits” (the film script) there is an example of a happier love relationship. I agree.

8 “Les Mandarins,” p. 487.

9 “Les Mandrins,” p. 192.