Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:15:55.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Rejoinder to ‘Size Matters, Although It Shouldn’t: The ICRW and Small Cetaceans’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2014

Sean Stephenson ,
Arne Mooers  and
Amir Attaran
Sean Stephenson
Affiliation:
Center for International Sustainable Development Law (CISDL), Montreal, QC (Canada). Email: [email protected].
Arne Mooers
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University (SFU), Department of Biological Sciences, Vancouver, BC (Canada). Email: [email protected].
Amir Attaran
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Faculties of Law and Medicine, Ottawa, ON (Canada). Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rejoinder
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , October 2014 , pp. 279 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Couzens, E., ‘Size Matters, Although It Shouldn’t: The ICRW and Small Cetaceans. A Reply to Stephenson, Mooers and Attaran’ (2014) 3(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 265–78.Google Scholar

2 Stephenson, S., Mooers, A. & Attaran, A., ‘Does Size Matter? The ICRW and the Inclusion of Small Cetaceans’ (2014) 3(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 241–63.Google Scholar

3 Washington, DC (US), 2 Dec. 1946, in force 10 Nov. 1948, available at: http://iwcoffice.int/convention.

4 Couzens, n. 1 above, at p. 266.

5 Ibid., at p. 266.

6 ICJ, Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan, New Zealand intervening), Judgment of 31 Mar. 2014, available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/148/18136.pdf.

7 Couzens, n. 1 above, at p. 277.

8 Stephenson, Mooers & Attaran, n. 2 above, p. 250.

9 Ibid., at p. 265.

10 Ibid., at p. 269.

11 Ibid., at p. 271.

12 Ibid., at p. 272.

13 Ibid., at p. 272.

14 Ibid., at p. 272.

15 Ibid., at p. 272.

16 IWC, Future of the IWC, available online at: http://iwc.int/future.

17 IWC, ‘Annual Report of the International Whaling Commission 2011, Chair’s Report of the 63rd Annual Meeting’, at p. 7, available at: https://archive.iwc.int/pages/view.php?ref=1577&search=%21collection49&order_by=relevance&sort=DESC&offset=0&archive=0&k=&curpos=2.

18 Ibid., at p. 7.

19 IWC, ‘Annual Report of the International Whaling Commission 2012, Chair’s Report of the 64th Annual Meeting’, at p. 28, available at: https://archive.iwc.int/pages/view.php?ref=3273&search=%21collection49&order_by=relevance&sort=DESC&offset=0&archive=0&k=&curpos=1.

20 Couzens, E., ‘A Strange Beast Swimming Upstream: The International Whaling Commission in the Context of Synergies between Biodiversity-related MEAs’ (including a Multilateral Simulation Exercise), in Honkonen, T. & Couzens, E. (eds), International Environmental Law-making and Diplomacy Review (University of Eastern Finland, 2011), pp. 223– 60Google Scholar, at 225, available at: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/course_review_2011.pdf.

21 Ibid.

22 Ibid., at p. 227.