Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:49:37.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protecting the Third Pole: Transplanting International Law, by Simon Marsden Edward Elgar, 2019, 328 pp, £95 hb ISBN 9781786437402 hb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2022

Mehran Idris Khan
Mehran Idris Khan*
Affiliation:
Dalian Maritime University School of Law, Dalian (China)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 218 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chang, M.I. Khan & Y.-C., ‘Love for the Climate in Sino–Pakistan Economic Romance: A Perspective of Environmental Laws’ (2020) 23 Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, pp. 1–13Google Scholar.

2 Brandon, S. Marsden & E., Transboundary Environmental Governance in Asia: Practice and Prospects with the UNECE Agreements (Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar; Marsden, S., Environmental Regimes in Asian Subregions: China and the Third Pole (Edward Elgar, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See P. Legrand, ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’ (1997) 4(2) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, pp. 111–24; A. Boute, ‘The Impossible Transplant of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: The Challenge of Energy Market Regulation’ (2017) 6(1) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 59–85.

4 Florence (Italy), 20 Oct. 2000, in force 1 Mar. 2004, available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=176.

5 UNESCO Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Paris (France), 16 Nov. 1972, in force 17 Dec. 1975, available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext.

6 Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat, Ramsar (Iran), 2 Feb. 1971, in force 21 Dec. 1975, available at: http://www.ramsar.org.

7 Council of Europe, Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Bern (Switzerland), 19 Sept. 1979, in force 1 June 1982, available at: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/nature/bern/default_en.asp.

8 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, Madrid (Spain), 4 Oct. 1991, in force 14 Jan. 1998, available at: https://www.ats.aq/e/protocol.html.

9 See M. Cashmore et al., ‘The Interminable Issue of Effectiveness: Substantive Purposes, Outcomes and Research Challenges in the Advancement of Environmental Impact Assessment Theory’ (2004) 22(4) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, pp. 295–310; B. Ahmad & C. Wood, ‘A Comparative Evaluation of the EIA Systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia’ (2002) 22(3) Environmental Impact Assessment Review, pp. 213–34; I. Lyhne et al., ‘Theorising EIA Effectiveness: A Contribution Based on the Danish System’ (2017) 62 Environmental Impact Assessment Review, pp. 240–9.

10 UNECE Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, Espoo (Finland), 25 Feb. 1991, in force 10 Sept. 1997, available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM//env/eia/eia.htm.

11 Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, Kiev (Ukraine), 21 May 2003, in force 11 July 2010, available at: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/eia/documents/legaltexts/protocolenglish.pdf.

12 Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), Judgment (Merits), 25 Sept. 1977, ICJ Reports (1997), p. 7. See also Nagheeby, M., Faure, M. Piri D. & M., ‘The Legitimacy of Dam Development in International Watercourses: A Case Study of the Harirud River Basin’ (2019) 8(2) Transnational Environmental Law pp. 247–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin, Chiang Rai (Thailand), 5 Apr. 1995, in force 5 Apr. 1995, available at: https://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/policies/agreement-Apr95.pdf; Devlaeminck, D.J., ‘Softness in the Law of International Watercourses: The (E)merging Normativities of China's Lancang-Mekong Cooperation’ (2022) Transnational Environmental Law (forthcoming)Google Scholar.

14 UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Helsinki Convention), Helsinki (Finland), 17 Mar. 1992, in force 6 Oct. 1996, available at: http://www.unece.org/env/water.

15 Framework Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians, Kiev (Ukraine), 22 May 2003, in force 4 Jan. 2006, available at: http://www.carpathianconvention.org.

16 Alpine Convention, Salzburg (Austria), 7 Nov. 1991, in force 6 Mar. 1995, available at: https://www.alpconv.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Convention/EN/Framework_Convention_EN.pdf.