Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:43:16.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Environmental Governance, Technology and Politics: The Anthropocene Gap, by Victor Galaz Edward Elgar, 2014, 208 pp, £70 hb, ISBN 9781781955543

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2015

Rakhyun E. Kim
Rakhyun E. Kim*
Affiliation:
Griffith University Law School, Brisbane (Australia)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 202 - 205
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5 See, e.g., Crutzen, P.J., ‘Geology of Mankind’ (2002) 415(6867) Nature, p. 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Steffen, W. et al., Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure (IGBP Secretariat, 2004)Google Scholar; Steffen, W., Crutzen, P.J. & McNeill, J.R., ‘The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?’ (2007) 36(8) Ambio, pp. 614–621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Steffen, W. et al., ‘The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship’ (2011) 40(7) Ambio, pp. 739–761CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. & McNeill, J., ‘The Anthropocene: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives’ (2011) 369 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, pp. 842–867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

6 See, e.g., Young, O.R., The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale (The MIT Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Galaz, V. et al., ‘The Problem of Fit among Biophysical Systems, Environmental and Resource Regimes, and Broader Governance Systems: Insights and Emerging Challenges’, in O.R. Young, L.A. King & H. Schroeder (eds), Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers (The MIT Press, 2008), pp. 147–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See, e.g., Ostrom, E., ‘Coping with Tragedies of the Commons’ (1999) 2 Annual Review of Political Science, pp. 493–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P.C., ‘The Struggle to Govern the Commons’ (2003) 302(5652) Science, pp. 1907–1912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Ostrom, E., Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Ostrom, E., ‘Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change’ (2010) 20 Global Environmental Change, pp. 550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar.