Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:00:47.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Environmental Constitutionalism, by James R. May & Erin Daly Cambridge University Press, 2014, 414 pp, £65 hb, ISBN 9781107022256

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

Tim Stephens*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Law School, Sydney, NSW (Australia)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4 Hamilton, C. & Grinevald, J., ‘Was the Anthropocene Anticipated’ (2015) 2(1) The Anthropocene Review, pp. 5972CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Steffen, W. et al., ‘Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet’ (2015) 347(6223) Science, pp. 737745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

6 See, e.g., Biermann, F., Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene (The MIT Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 The leading Australian piece, not cited by the authors, is Crawford, J., ‘The Constitution and the Environment’ (1991) 13(1) Sydney Law Review, pp. 1130Google Scholar. New Zealand and Canada, by contrast, attract greater attention.

8 A recent compendium of comparative constitutional materials is Ross, S., Irving, H. & Klug, H., Comparative Constitutional Law: A Contextual Approach (LexisNexis, 2014)Google Scholar.

9 E.g., Constitution of the Philippines, Art. II, s. 16: ‘The State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature’.