Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T03:31:03.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Animal Law from the Margins: International Trade in Animals and Their Bodies, by Iyan Offor Routledge, 2023, 320 pp, £145 hb, £35.99 ebk ISBN 9781032226989 hb, 9781003273783 ebk

Review products

Global Animal Law from the Margins: International Trade in Animals and Their Bodies, by Iyan Offor Routledge, 2023, 320 pp, £145 hb, £35.99 ebk ISBN 9781032226989 hb, 9781003273783 ebk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

Veerle Platvoet Open the ORCID record for Veerle Platvoet [Opens in a new window]
Veerle Platvoet*
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Helsinki (Finland)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2024 , pp. 652 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Grear, A., ‘The Vulnerable Living Order: Human Rights and the Environment in a Critical and Philosophical Perspective’ (2011) 2(1) Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, pp. 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 27.

2 Ibid., p. 27.

3 Ibid., p. 33.

4 Baxi, U., The Future of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 234CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Matthews, K. Birrell & D., ‘Re-Storying Laws for the Anthropocene: Rights, Obligations and an Ethics of Encounter’ (2020) 31(3) Law and Critique, pp. 275–92Google Scholar, at 283.

6 Shanker, A. & Kempers, E. Bernet, ‘The Emergence of a Transjudicial Animal Rights Discourse and Its Potential for International Animal Rights Protection’ (2022) 10(2) Global Journal of Animal Law, pp. 1–53Google Scholar, at 1.

7 These changes include a newly appointed Advisory Board with animal law scholars from around the globe, as well as a statement on the aspirations of the journal on the website, available at: https://ojs.abo.fi/ojs/index.php/gjal/about. The aim of the journal – to foster a global platform in animal law – is considered in the editorial assessment of new submissions.

8 Marrakesh (Morocco), 15 Apr. 1994, in force 1 Jan. 1995, available at: http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/06-gatt_e.htm.

9 European Communities – Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products, WTO Appellate Body Report, WTO Docs WT/DS400/AB/R and WT/DS401/AB/R, 22 May 2014 (EC Seals case).

10 Ibid., paras 5.289, 5.338.

11 Favre, D., ‘An International Treaty for Animal Welfare’, in Cao, D. & White, S. (eds), Animal Law and Welfare: International Perspectives (Springer, 2016), pp. 87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar.