Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:53:31.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Resettlement of England after the Barons' War, 1264–67

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

C. H. Knowles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The confiscation and redistribution of the estates of the supporters of Simon de Montfort after the battle of Evesham plunged much of England into confusion. Such was the magnitude and violence of the social upheaval that even after the publication of the Dictum of Kenilworth in October 1266, and the general surrender of the rebels in the following summer, had brought organized resistance to an end, the country was still tense and uneasy. In August 1270, King Henry III abandoned his intention of accompanying his son the Lord Edward on crusade and made it known that he had taken this decision because ‘the prelates, magnates and community of the realm, consider it neither expedient nor safe that both of us should leave the kingdom’. Yet when Edward returned to England as king in August 1274, only seven years after the capitulation of the last rebel stronghold of the Isle of Ely, the situation had undergone a striking transformation. The bulk of the Montfortians had already regained possession of their lands and were being reassimilated into the political community. The theme of this paper is the nature of that recovery, and the light it throws on the operation of the land market and the character of the rebellion of 1264–7.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 32 , December 1982 , pp. 25 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Powicke, F. M., King Henry III and the Lord Edward, II (Oxford, 1947), p. 582Google Scholar. Ch. XII and XIII still constitute the best account of the resettlement.

2 Cal. Inq. Misc., I, nos. 507, 609–869, 871–940; Cal. Inq. Post Mortem, Henry III, no. 907. See also Jacob, E. F., Studies in the Period of Baronial Reform and Rebellion, 1258–1267 (Oxford, 1925), p. 151Google Scholar.

3 ‘Notes on an English Cluniac Chronicle’, ed. Cam, H. M. and Jacob, E. F., Eng. Hist. Rev, xliv (1929), 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The lands of the rebels were ‘at the king's disposal to grant to whom he will, saving the homages and services of the chief lord of the fee’ (Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, p. 56).

4 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 451, 457, 458, 460, etc; Jacob, , Studies, pp. 155–6Google Scholar.

5 Rotuli Selecti, ed. Hunter, J. (Record Commission, 1834), pp. 247–58Google Scholar. For other grants, see Jacob, , Studies, pp. 153–5Google Scholar.

6 Close Rolls (Supp.), pp. 44–5, nos. 433–4; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 612, 622; Somerville, R., History of the Duchy of Lancaster, I (London, 1953), pp. 2, 3–4, 337Google Scholar.

7 Rot. Sel., p. 248.

8 Close Rolls (Supp.), p. 40, nos. 379, 382; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 410.

9 Rot. Sel., p. 249; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 466, 522.

10 E.g., de Lusignan, GeoffreyRot. Sel., pp. 248–9Google Scholar; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 214.

11 Close Rolls (Supp.), p. 45, no. 437; Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, p. 57. Cf. Jacob, E. F., ‘The Reign of Henry III. Some Suggestions’, T.R. Hist. S., 4th ser., 10 (1927), 31–2Google Scholar. Nevill's houses in London were granted to John de Warenne (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 457, 468). See below, n. 83.

12 Close Rolls (Supp.), p. 45, no. 439; Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, p. 57. For the substantial grants to his wife Maud, see Rot. Sel., p. 250.

13 For the fate of the Londoners, see Williams, G. A., Medieval London. From Commune to Capital (London, 1963), pp. 232–42Google Scholar.

14 See especially Lewis, Alun, ‘Roger Leyburn and the Pacification of England, 1265–7’, Eng. Hist. Rev., liv (1939), 198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Cal. Close Rolls, 1279 88, p. 88. The lands of John fitz John, his other son-in-law, were divided between Gilbert de Clare, earl of Gloucester, and Roger de Clifford (Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 164; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 457).

16 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 504.

17 E.g., the royal justice Gilbert de Preston received the holdings of his brother William, (Close Rolls (Supp.), p. 44, no. 424Google Scholar; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 516).

18 E.g., Richard de Taney's lands were secured by his son Richard (Cal. Inq. Misc., I, nos. 661, 706).

19 E.g., Hugh le Bigod was granted some of the lands of Wake, Baldwin (Close Rolls (Supp.), p. 47, no. 451)Google Scholar.

20 Bracton De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae, ed. Woodbine, G. W. (3 vols., New Haven, Conn., 1915–1940), III, p. 360Google Scholar.

21 E.g., above, n. 15; below, II. 96.

22 Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 130; Cal. Inq. Misc., I, nos, 675, 769, 771, 777, 785, 928; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 459–60, 462, 497–8. The right of widowed mothers to retain possession of their dower seems to have been protected from the beginning (Rot. Set., p. 248; Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, p. 56).

23 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 526, 529, 533, 550, etc.

24 Fryde, Natalie, The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II 1321–1326 (Cambridge, 1979), p. 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Waugh, S. L., ‘The Confiscated Lands of the “Contrariants” in Gloucestershire and Herefordshire in 1322: An Economic and Social Study’ (unpublished University of London Ph.D. thesis, 1975), pp. 31–6Google Scholar.

25 Ross, C. D., ‘Forfeiture for Treason in the Reign of Richard II’, Eng. Hist. Rev., lxxi (1956), 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 P.R.O., S.C. 1/8/2.

27 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 537, 560, 656–7.

28 Ibid., pp. 536, 608–io, 654. The full text is printed in Liber de Anliquis Legibus, ed. Stapleton, T. (Camden Soc., xxxiv, 1846), pp. lxii–lxviGoogle Scholar. Walerand, received compensation (Cat. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 668; Rot. Set., p. 249)Google Scholar.

29 The Metrical Chronicle of Robert of Gloucester, ed. Wright, W. A. (2 vols., Rolls Series, 1887), II, p. 768Google Scholar.

30 Powicke, , King Henry III, II, p. 532Google Scholar.

31 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 672.

32 Documents of the Baronial Movement of Reform and Rebellion 1258–1267, selected by Treharne, R. F., ed. Sanders, I. J. (Oxford, 1973), pp. 317–37Google Scholar.

33 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, pp. 16–17, 22, etc.

34 Ibid., pp. 241 –2, 492; Close Rolls, 1268–72, p. 74.

35 Powicke, , King Henry III, II, p. 537Google Scholar. Cf. Annales Monastici, ed. Luard, H. R. (5 vols., Rolls Series, 1864–1869), IV, pp. 183–4Google Scholar.

36 E.g., Cal. Inq. Misc., I, nos. 747, 753; P.R.O., Just. I. 1/59, m. 8. Later the earl complained that land had been seized by men who were not answerable to him (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 287).

37 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 539, 621; above, p. 27. For a different view of Gilbert de Clare see, Altschul, M., A Baronial Family in Medieval England: The Clares, 1217–1314 (Baltimore, 1965), pp. 110–21Google Scholar.

38 Powicke, , King Henry III, II, p. 541Google Scholar.

39 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 73.

40 Historical Papers and Letters from the Northern Registers, ed. Raine, J. (Rolls Series, 1873). PP. 17–18Google Scholar.

41 Ann. Monastici, IV, pp. 207– 10.

42 E.g., P.R.O., E.368/41, m. 15d (John de Churchill's redemption agreement with William de Chaboneys).

43 E.g., Priory of Barnwell, co. Cambs (P.R.O., Just I. 1/618, m.i) (Humphrey de Bassingborn's redemption agreement with John de Vaux).

44 E.g., Close Rolls, 1264–68, pp. 559–60. In some agreements a manor was mortgaged to the grantee as security for payment of the fine (e.g., ibid., p. 389).

45 E.g., ibid., p. 545.

46 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, pp. 169, 282–3.

47 Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 485; Cf. V. C. H. Warwicks., V (London, 1949), pp. 104–5.

48 Historical Letters from Northern Registers, pp. 19–20.

49 Documents of the Baronial Movement, pp. 324–5.

50 E.g., P.R.O., K.B. 27/15, m. 2d.

51 Cal. Chart Rolls, II, pp. 89–90. Cf. Barton, J. L., ‘The Medieval Use’, Law Quarterly Review, 81 (1965), p. 563Google Scholar.

52 Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, pp. 90–1; Complete Peerage, X, p. 220.

53 E.g., P.R.O., E.368/41, 42, 43. For later redemptions see, Powicke, , King Henry III, II. P. 554Google Scholar

54 See Select Cases in King's Bench, ed. Sayles, G. O., II (Selden Soc, 57, 1938), p. cxxiiGoogle Scholar.

55 Documents of the Baronial Movement, pp. 330–1.

56 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 160.

57 Ibid., p. 696.

58 E.g., Nicholas de Yattendon (Jacob, , Studies, p. 228Google Scholar; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 290).

59 The best account is still Jacob, , Studies, pp. 167–201Google Scholar.

60 Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 86.

61 The others were Robert de Vere, Ralph Basset of Drayton, Ralph Basset of Sapcote, Walter de Coleville, Hugh Despenser, John d'Eyvill, Gilbert de Gaunt, Henry of Hastings, John fitz John, William Marmion, William de Munchenesy, Adam de Neuf-marché, Roger de St. John, Nicholas de Segrave and John de Vescy.

62 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, pp. 641, 678; ibid., 1266–72, pp. 216–17; Close rolls, 1264–68, p. 387.

63 Powicke, , King Henry III, II, pp. 524–5Google Scholar; Denholm-Young, N., Richard of Cornwall (Oxford, 1947), p. 144, n. IGoogle Scholar. Certain estates were recovered (P.R.O., K.B. 27/15, m. iod; 18, m. 24d).

64 Cal. Close Rolls, 1279–88, p. 88.

65 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1272–81, p. 119.

66 Cal. Inq. Misc., I, no. 1024.

67 Coss, P. R., ‘Sir Geoffrey de Langley and the Crisis of the Knightly Class in Thirteenth-Century England’, Past & Present, no. 68 (1975), 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 74.

69 P.R.O., C.60/62, m. 7.

70 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, pp. 181, 636, 638; Chronica Monasterii de Melsa, ed. Bond, E. A. (3 vols., Rolls Series, 1866–1868), II, pp. xix, 118–19Google Scholar.

71 Close Rolls, 1268–72, pp. 588–9; ibid., 1264–68, pp. 399, 532; P.R.O., E. 159/42, m. 27d; 44, m. 12d.

72 Cal. Inq. Misc., I, no. 983; Cal. Pal. Rolls, 1266–72, pp. 636, 638.

73 The Early Rolls of Merton College, Oxford, ed. Highfield, J. R. L. (Oxford Hist. Soc., new ser., xviii, 1964), pp. 28, 42–3Google Scholar; Roth, C., ‘Oxford Starrs’, Oxoniensia, xxii (1957), 65–77Google Scholar.

74 Cal. Close Rolls, 1279–88, pp. 80–1. The list is incomplete e.g., Richard de Sees, a former rebel, disposed of land to Eleanor who bestowed it on Ferre, John (Close Rolls, 1264–68, pp. 505Google Scholar, 514; Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, p. 188). See also Harvey, Barbara, Westminster Abbey and its Estates in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1977), pp. 31–2Google Scholar.

75 The others were de Burgh, John and de Camoys, Ralph (Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 636Google Scholar; ibid., 1266–72, p. 61).

76 Rot. Sel., p. 248; Close Rolls (Supp.), p. 38, no. 355; P.R.O., K.B. 26/193, m 17d; Brand, P. A., ‘Oldcotes v. d'Arcy’, Medieval Legal Records, ed. Hunnisett, R. F. and Post, J. B. (London, 1978), pp. 68–9Google Scholar.

77 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1272–81, p. 113; cf. p. 80; Cal. Close Rolls, 1272 79, pp. 180, 205, 221; Cal. Chart. Rolls, II, p. 395.

78 Above, p. 33.

79 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 608; Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 254. See above, p. 29.

80 de Brus, Robert (d. 1276) (Complete Peerage, IX, p. 483Google Scholar; Cal. Inq. Post Mortem, Edward I, II, nos. 160, 194).

81 Guiseppi, M. S., ‘On the Testament of Sir Hugh de Nevill, written at Acre, 1267’, Archaeologia, lvi (2nd ser., vi, 1899), 359Google Scholar.

82 P.R.O., D.L. 25/L. 1317; Excerpta ē Rotulis Finium, II (Record Commission, 1836), p. 498Google Scholar.

83 Cal. Inq. Post Mortem, Edward I, II, no. 6. Hugh's houses in London were redeemed by his brother John in 1270 (P.R.O., K.B. 26/198, m. 18d). See above, n. 11.

84 ‘Miracula Simonis de Montfort’, The Chronicle of William de Rishanger of the Barons' Wars, ed. Halliwell, J. O. (Camden Soc, xv, 1840), pp. 67–110Google Scholar; Finucane, R. C., Miracles and Pilgrims. Popular Beliefs in Medieval England (London, 1977), pp. 131–5, 169–70Google Scholar.

85 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1247–58, p. 655; ibid., 1258–66, pp. 163, 327.

86 Close Rolls, 1264–68, pp. 520–1; P.R.O., K.B. 26/182, m. 22; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 326.

87 ‘Miracula’, p. 106. Simon, died at Easter 1274 (Ann. Monastici, III, p. 260)Google Scholar.

88 Powicke, F. M., ‘Guy de Montfort (1265–71)’, T.R. Hist. S., 4th ser., 18 (1935), 1–23, especially 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 D.N.B., LVIII, p. 288. William was in the garrison of Gloucester castle which surrendered to Edward in June 1265 (Ann. Monastici, IV, p. 166). For the career of his brother John see below, pp. 40–1.

90 l'ita Edwardi Secundi, ed. Denholm-Young, N. (London, 1957), p. 109Google Scholar.

91 P.R.O., KB. 26/205, m. 8.

92 Denholm-Young, N., ‘Feudal Society in the Thirteenth Century: The Knights’, History, xxix (1944), 107–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 Parliamentary Writs, ed. Palgrave, F., I (Record Commission, 1827), pp. 193–5Google Scholar.

94 Tout, T. F., Chapters in the Administrative History of Mediaeval England, I (Manchester, 1920), p. 309Google Scholar.

95 Cal. Pal. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 423.

96 Ibid., 1266–72, p. 12. Walter Giffard's sister Maud was the widow of the rebel William d'Evreux killed at Evesham (ibid., 1258–66, p. 462).

97 Ibid., 1266–72, p. 621; Cal. Fine Rolls, 1272–1307, p. 11.

98 Cal. Pal. Rolls, 1272–81, p. 112; D.N.B., L, pp. 280–1.

99 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 265; P.R.O., Just. I. 1/83, m. I4d.

100 State Trials of the Reign of Edward the First, 1289–93, ed. Tout, T. F. and Johnstone, Hilda (Camden Soc., 3rd ser., ix, 1906), pp. xxxi–xxxiiGoogle Scholar; Select Cases in King's Bench, I (Selden Soc, 55, 1936), pp. li–liiGoogle Scholar.

101 Cal. Pal. Rolls, 1247–58, p. 56; Close Rolls, 1264–1268, p. 131.

102 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1258–66, p. 392; Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 131.

103 Close Rolls, 1264–68, p. 257; ibid., 1268–72, p. 353; Cal. Fine Rolls, 1272–1307, pp. 32, 103.

104 Griffiths, R. A., The Principality of Wales in the Later Middle Ages, I: South Wales, 1277–1536 (Cardiff, 1972), pp. 94–5Google Scholar; Complete Peerage, VI, pp. 405–8.

105 Beebe, B., ‘The English Baronage and the Crusade of 1270’, Bull. Insl. Hist. Res., xlviii (1975), 131–5Google Scholar.

106 Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1266–72, p. 574.

107 Flores Historiarum, ed. Luard, H. J. (3 vols., Rolls Series, 1890), III, p. 6Google Scholar; Annales Londonienses, ed. Stubbs, W. (Rolls Series, 1882), p. 69Google Scholar; Ann. Monastici, IV, pp. 197–8.

108 Calendar of Documents relating to Scotland, ed. Bain, J., I (Edinburgh, 1881), p. 487Google Scholar, no. 2456 (redemption agreement with the count of St. Pol).

109 The Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough, ed. Rothwell, H. (Camden Third Series, lxxxix, 1957), p. 209Google Scholar.

110 D.N.B., LVIII, p. 287; Complete Peerage, XII, pt. ii, pp. 278–80. Edward paid for masses for the soul of William de Munchenesy, who had fought against him at Lewes and Kenilworth, and was killed fighting in Wales in 1287 (Cal. Inq. Misc., I., no. 845; Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1272–81, p. 80; Complete Peerage, IX, p. 424, n. ‘c’).