Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:08:50.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Address: Tudor Government: The Points of Contact III. The Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

G. R. Elton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

WHEN on the previous two occasions I discussed Parliament and Council as political centres, as institutions capable of assisting or undermining stability in the nation, I had to draw attention to quite a few unanswered questions. However, I also found a large amount of well established knowledge on which to rely. Now, in considering the role of the King's or Queen's Court, I stand more baffled than ever, more deserted. We all know that there was a Court, and we all use the term with frequent ease, but we seem to have taken it so much for granted that we have done almost nothing to investigate it seriously. Lavish descriptions abound of lavish occasions, both in the journalism of the sixteenth century and in the history books, but the sort of study which could really tell us what it was, what part it played in affairs, and even how things went there for this or that person, seems to be confined to a few important articles. At times it has all the appearance of a fully fledged institution; at others it seems to be no more than a convenient conceptual piece of shorthand, covering certain people, certain behaviour, certain attitudes. As so often, the shadows of the seventeenth century stretch back into the sixteenth, to obscure our vision. Analysts of the reigns of the first two Stuarts, endeavouring to explain the political troubles of that age, increasingly concentrate upon an alleged conflict between the Court and the Country; and so we are tempted, once again, to seek the prehistory of the ever interesting topic in the age of Elizabeth or even Henry VIII.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 26 , December 1976 , pp. 211 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zagorin, P., The Court and the Country: the Beginning of the English Revolution (London, 1969), p. 41Google Scholar.

2 Ross, C. D., Edward IV (London, 1974), p. 312Google Scholar.

3 de Guevara, Antonio, A Dispraise of the Life of a Courtier and a Commendation of the Life of a Labouring Man, trs. Bryan, F. (London, 1548)Google Scholar.

4 Cf. Starkey, D. R., ‘The King's Privy Chamber 1485–1547’ unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (Cambridge, 1973)Google Scholar.

5 MacCaffrey, Wallace T., ‘Place and Patronage in Elizabethan Polities’, Elizabethan Government and Society, ed. Bindoff, S. T., Hurstfield, J., Williams, C. H. (London, 1961), pp. 100 –10Google Scholar.

6 Elton, G. R., The Tudor Constitution (Cambridge, 1960), p. 122Google Scholar.

7 Wallace, W. M., Sir Walter Raleigh (London, 1959), pp. 25, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Read, Conyers, Mr Secretary Walsingham and the Policy of Queen Elizabeth i, (Oxford, 1925). P. 438Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., 437.

10 Two Early Tudor Lives, ed. Sylvester, R. S. and Harding, D. P. (New Haven, Conn., 1962), p. 202Google Scholar.

11 Letters and Papers of Henry VIII [hereafter LP], x. 792.

12 The Memoirs of Robert Carey, ed. Mares, F. H. (Oxford, 1972), pp. 29, 30–31, 43–44Google Scholar.

13 LP, xii. II. 952.

14 LP, x, pp. 291–92.

15 Smith, L. Baldwin, Henry VIII: the Mask of Royally (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Johnson, P., Elizabeth I: a Study in Power and Intellect (London, 1974)Google Scholar.

16 Ives, E. W., ‘Faction at the Court of Henry VIII: the Fall of Anne Boleyn ‘, History, 47 (1972), pp. 169 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar. In a still unpublished paper, written before Dr Ives' article appeared, Dr D. R. Starkey offers a slightly different and rather more penetrating interpretation which rightly stresses the role of the Privy Oiamber in the story. I am obliged to Dr Starkey for letting me see his essay.

17 Ante, 25 (1975) 205.

18 MacCaffrey, Wallace T., The Shaping of the Elizabethan Regime (Princeton, N.J., 1968)Google Scholar.

18a Williams, N. J., All the Queen's Men (London, 1972), p. 14Google Scholar.

19 Read, Conyers, Mr Secretary Walsingham (three volumes); Mr Secretary Cecil and Queen Elizabeth (London, 1955)Google Scholar; Lord Burghley and Queen Elizabeth (London, 1960)Google Scholar.

20 Ives, , op. cit., pp. 177–78Google Scholar.