Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:13:16.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Address: The Rise and Fall of English Landed Families, 1600–1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

John Habakkuk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are two types of question that can be asked about estate-ownership. The first relates to actual families. What was the rate of turnover of landed families, i.e. what percentage appeared and disappeared in, say, each half century? What sort of families were rising and for what reasons? How many were old-established and how many were new? Which families were declining and how many were extinguished; and what were the causes of decline and extinction? Among such questions it is reasonable to ask whether the size of a family's estate made a difference to its survival, whether for example the great families of 1600 fared better or worse than the gentry in the following centuries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 29 , December 1979 , pp. 187 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Borlase, William, quoted in Daniel, and Lysons, Samuel, Magna Britannia, III (1814), clxxivGoogle Scholar.

2 Thompson, F. M. L., ‘The Social Distribution of Property in England since the Sixteenth Century’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., xix, no. 3 (1966), 505–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 SirSpelman, Henry, The History and Rate of Sacrilege, edited by two priests ot the Church of England (London, 1846)Google Scholar, chs. vi–viii, apps. i–iii. The importance of descent for the ownership of estates was first systematically discussed by Cooper, J. P., ‘The Counting of Manors’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., viii, no. 3 (1956), 377–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Hollingsworth, T. H., The Demography of the British Peerage (Supplement to Population Studies, vol. XVIII, No. 2, 1964), p. 30Google Scholar.

5 Martin, J. O., ‘The Landed Estate in Glamorgan circa 1660 to 1760’ (Cambridge Ph.D. thesis 1978), p. 219Google Scholar.

6 Hollingsworth, , Demography of the British Peerage, p. 20Google Scholar.

7 Complete Peerage, ed. Cockayne, G. E., II, 402Google Scholar, n. ‘b’.

8 Private Act 24 Geo. III (1783), cap. 9. To invest part of the devised estates dis-charged of the uses of Charles, late Duke of Bolton's will, in trustees to enable them to carry into execution a decree and orders of the court of chancery for sale thereof. Private Act Geo. III (1790), cap. 37, with same intent referring specifically to manors of Fisherton and Delamere, Co. Wilts.

9 For an example, see the will of Hillersden, Thomas of Elstow, (Bedfordshire Notes and Queries, iii. 284)Google Scholar.

10 Loftis, John, Comedy and Society from Congreve to Fielding (Stanford, 1959), p. 46Google Scholar.

11 Henry, Elizabeth and George. Letters and Diaries of Henry, Tenth Earl of Pembroke and his Circle, ed. Herbert, Lord (London, 1939), p. 18Google Scholar.

12 Private Act 20 Geo. III (1780) cap. 40: To vest the fee simple of estates settled by thewill of Robert, late Duke of Ancaster, in trustees to be sold, to pay off incumbrances affecting the same.

13 The Grenville Papers: being the correspondence of Richard Grenville, Earl Temple, and the Rt. Hon. George Grenville, ed. Smith, W. J. (1852–1853), i, 423Google Scholar, 429.

14 Leighton, S., ‘Changes in Land Ownership in Shropshire’, Trans. Shropshire Arch. Soc., pt. 1, 2nd ser., viii (1896), 3Google Scholar.

15 Private Act 10 Geo. I, cap. 9.

16 Stone, L., ‘The Elizabethan Aristocracy—a Restatement’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., iv, no. 3, (1952), 303Google Scholar; The Letters of Edward Gibbon, ed. Norton, J. E., iii (London, 1956) letter 725, pp. 150–1Google Scholar.

17 Bedforshire Record Office, D.D. W W 100, 293, 371.

18 Cust, Lady Elizabeth, Records of the Cust Family, Series II, The Brownlows of Belton (1909). PP. 304–5Google Scholar.

19 Locke, John, Some considerations of the Consequences of the lowering of Interest and Raising the value of money, 1st ed. (1692), in Works (1823 ed.), v, 53Google Scholar.

20 Kerridge, E., ‘The Movement of Rent, 1540–1640’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., vi, no. 1 (1953–1954), 16–34Google Scholar; Mingay, G. E., ‘The Agricultural Depression, 1730–1750’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., viii, no. 3 (1955–1956), 323–38Google Scholar; Davies, Margaret G., ‘Country Gentry and Falling Rents in the 1660s and 1670s’, Midland History, iv, no. 2 (1977), 86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Hume, David, Essays, moral, political and literary, ed. Green, T. H. and Grose, T. H. (London 1875), i, 322–3Google Scholar.

22 For Buckingham, , see H.M.C. 12th Report Appendix VI, pp. 218–19Google Scholar. For Wharton, , see Complete Peerage, XII, pt. ii, 611Google Scholar, n. ‘f’. The Wharton fortunes had already been undermined by the election activities of the first Duke's father, Thomas.

23 Nash, T. R., Collections for a History of Worcestershire, i (1781), viiiGoogle Scholar.

24 See Turner, R. W., The Equity of Redemption (Cambridge, 1931)Google Scholar.

25 Jacob, Giles, Compleat Court Keeper (1713), p. 5Google Scholar; Lawrence, EdwardDissertation on Estates, (1730), p. 21Google Scholar. Kent, Nathaniel, Hints to Gentlemen of Landed Properly (1775), p. 113Google Scholar. The rate was thirty years' purchase at the end of the century (Parliamentary History, xxxiv, 104–5).

26 Thompson, F. M. L., ‘The End of a Great Estate’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 2nd ser., viii, no. I (1955), 36–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Finch, M. E., The Wealth of Five Northamptonshire Families, 1540–1640 (Northamptonshire Record Society, xix, 1956Google Scholar, ch. IV; Gay, Edwin F., ‘Sir Richard Temple, The Debt Settlement and Estate Litigation, 1653–1675’, Huntington Library Quarterly, vi, no. 3 (05 1943), 255–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Leeds City Library, Temple Newsam Correspondence 23/144, Waple to Mrs. Irwin, 20 May1761.

29 Private Act 21 Geo. III (1781), cap. 28. To divest the fee simple of James Earl of Salisbury's estates out of Charles Banks and his heirs and vest the same in trustees etc. The properties in Buckinghamshire, Northants, Nottingham and Surrey which came to the Salisbury family as a result of the marriage to the heiress of Simon Bennet were sold between 1781 and 1807.

30 Private Act 26 Geo. II (1753), cap. 32. To sell estate at Bretherton, Lancashire, pursuant to the will of John, Earl of Ashburnham. Private Act 4 Geo. III (1764), cap. 68. To vest in John, Earl of Ashburnham, in fee simple lands in Bedford, Dorset and Lancaster, comprised in his marriage settlement, and settle lands in Wales in lieu thereof.

31 Sheffield City Library, Wentworth Wodehouse Mss, M 15.

32 Private Act 5 Geo. II (1732), cap. 4.