Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:00:57.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Presidential Address: Main Currents in Russian Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

In my first Address from this chair I chose as my subject ‘The Foundations of British Policy’, in the belief that its study is more than ever incumbent upon ourselves and upon the succeeding generation, and that neglect and incomprehension are among the major causes of the most devastating war in all our history. And if it is an urgent duty, in the interests of future peace, to study and discuss the workings of our own policy, it follows that we must also clear our minds as to the underlying motives of other Powers, both friendly and hostile. The price that we have all had to pay for neglect of German history is even to-day not yet fully understood. But to the plain man Russian policy, with its many shifts of extreme violence, is even more mysterious. Thus the events which brought us together in 1941, in an alliance of twenty years for which there is no precedent, ought to be, nay are, the personal concern of every one of us. These events, the result of Hitler's supreme blunder in invading Russia, represent a rebound from unreasoning isolation and appeasement to a policy first of guarantees, then of increasingly effective intervention, and finally of unswerving ‘jusqu'au-bout-isme’. Are we to assume that that unconventional alliance was merely dictated by passing necessity and is in gradual dissolution, or alternately that it rests upon a solidarity of interests which far outbids ideological aims?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 171 note 1 Among its officers were an Elphinstone and a Greig.

page 177 note 1 This is only one out of several points at which I should like to commend very specially to the reader's attention Mr. B. H. Sumner's Russia and the Balkans and his Tsarism and Imperialism (Raleigh Lecture, 1940).Google Scholar

page 178 note 1 L'Europe et la Revolution française, i. 536.Google Scholar

page 180 note 1 Poole, S. Lane, Life of Stratford Canning, i. 372.Google Scholar

page 182 note 1 Martin, , Life of Prince Consort, iv. 101–2.Google Scholar

page 182 note 2 Maxwell, , Life of Clarendon, ii. 166.Google Scholar

page 182 note 3 Even more remarkable is the more general sentiment expressed by Aberdeen in a letter to Hudson Gurney in 1857 (Stanmore, , Lord Aberdeen, p. 302Google Scholar): ‘You are quite right in supposing that I look back with satisfaction to the efforts made by me to preserve peace. My only cause of regret is that when I found this to be impossible, I did not at once retire, instead of allowing myself to be dragged into a war which, although strictly justifiable in itself, was most unwise and unnecessary. All this will be acknowledged some day, but the worst of it is that it will require fifty years before men's eyes are opened to the truth.’