Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:51:00.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberal Toryism in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Michael Bentley
Michael Bentley
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

DUST has scarcely had time to settle on Lady Thatcher; yet already a thick sediment of historical significance attaches to the fifteen years of her ascendancy. The period between 1975 and 1990 looks likely to prove as significant for the political ideologies of the twenty-first century as that between, say, 1885 and 1906 currently looks for our own. In the twilight world of John Major (who appears part-antidote, part-surrogate), Conservative ideology is becoming informed by reviews from both sides as they reflect on not only what went wrong but what it was that seemingly went so right, from a party point of view, for so long. We have just had placed before us, for example, John Campbell's admirable biography of Sir Edward Heath, on theone hand, and Alan Clark's transfixing diaries very much on the other. Such documents supplement amass of theorising and comment by political scientists and journalists, most of which dwells on the twin themes of discontinuity and dichotomy. The history of the Tory party is seen to enter a period of catastrophe by the end of the Heath government out of which there emerges a distinct party ideology which people call ‘Thatcherism’: a ‘New Conservatism’ radically distinct from the compromise and accommodation that marked politics after 1951. But that process was contested within the party—hence a dichotomy between two persuasions: the hawks and the doves, the dries and the wets, the Tories and the Conservatives, the true blues and the Liberals. Language of this kind has a particular interest to historians. They want to raise issues about its chronological deep-structure: how ‘new’ was this ‘New Conservatism’?. They recognise the need to situate the dichotomies of the moment in a wider context of Conservative experience: how singular is a doctrine of dichotomy within Conservative party doctrine? Above all they bring into question bald postulates about the nature of current Conservatism which do not compare experience across time

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 4 , December 1994 , pp. 177 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It will be evident that this paper, first projected during the period of Mrs Thatcher's government, has been written for oral delivery. I have chosen to retain that patina for the printed version.

2 Campbell, John, Edward Heath (1993)Google Scholar; Clark, Alan, Diaries (1993)Google Scholar.

3 Cosgrave, Patrick, Thatcher: the first term (1985), 9Google Scholar.

4 Witness Hurd's remark after he was attacked for the Peterhead prison riot in 1987. ‘People pin the label “liberal” on me. In don't think I am.’ Sunday Telegraph, 4 Oct. 1987

5 Cowling, Maurice, ‘The Present Position’, in Cowling, (ed.), Conservative Essays (1978), 13Google Scholar

6 diary, Clark 26 11 1985, in Diaries, p. 123Google Scholar. Bottomley had described herself to his local newspaper as ‘basically a good Liberal’.

7 Ibid., 6 Jan. 1991, 387. The ‘Tristan’ was Tristan Garel-Jones.

8 Quoted in Campbell, , Heath, 271Google Scholar.

9 Scruton, Roger, The Meaning of Conservatism (1980), 21Google Scholar.

10 Grainger, J. H., Character and Style in English Politics (Cambridge, 1969), 220Google Scholar. The problem derives from seeing men as different as Peel, Disraeli, Neville Chamberlain and Macmillan complicit in some linear tradition, or from hoping that a simultaneous presentation of the view of Utley, T. E., Butler, R. A. and White, R.J. will tell one ‘what Tories think’. (216)Google Scholar

11 Watson, George, The English Ideology: studies in the language of Victorian politics (1973), 104Google Scholar.

12 Macaulay, T.B., History of England from the Accession of James II (1849–1861, ed. Firth, , 1913), I, 88Google Scholar. How prescient that he went on to observe: ‘The extreme section of one class consists of bigoted dotards: the extreme section of the other consists of shallow and reckless empirics.’ Ibid. It is no less interesting that Macaulay made use of this language before it had become common to do so in connection with the idea of the state: for a perspective on this sense of ‘frontier’, see Bentley, Michael, ‘“Boundaries” in British Political Thought and Doctrine’, in The Boundaries of the State (eds.) Green, Simon and Whiting, Richard (Cambridge, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

13 Gilmour, IanInside Right: a study in Conservatism (1977), 12Google Scholar.

14 Drucker, H., Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour party (1979)Google Scholar

15 Eg.Gamble, Andrew, The Free Economy and the Strong State: the politics of Thatcherism (1988)Google Scholar.

16 Gilmour, , Inside Right, 130Google Scholar. Changing the metaphor to a more defensive mode, Gilmour also argued in 1975 that the party should not go ‘digging [its] trenches further to the right.’ Quoted in Campbell, , Heath, 669Google Scholar.

17 Ibid., 116.

18 Ibid., 165.

19 Sparrow, Gerald, ‘RAB’: study of a statesman (1965), 24Google Scholar.

20 The present author is currently writing a study of Salisbury; for a good recent collection of essays, see Salisbury: the man and his policies (eds.) Blake, Robert and Cecil, Hugh (1987)Google Scholar. Bonar Law is still best approached through Blake's, Robert life, The Unknown Prime Minister: the life and times of Andrew Bonar Law 1858–1923 (1955)Google Scholar. For Birkenhead, see Campbell, John, F. E. Smith: first Earl of Birkenhead (1983)Google Scholar.

21 Stapleton, Augustus, The Political Life of the Rt Hon George Canning (3 vols., 1831), III, 4, 54–5Google Scholar.

22 Quoted in Clark, G. Kitson, Peel and the Conservative Party (1928), 34Google Scholar.

23 Conacher, J. B., The Peelites and the Party System (Newton Abbot, 1972), 174Google Scholar.

24 See Stewart, Robert, The Foundation of the Conservative Party 1830–67 (1978), 275Google Scholar. Cf. Lord Woolton's reflection on SirEden, Anthony who had ‘never wavered in his Conservatism, but had propounded Liberal principles.’ The Memoirs of the Rt Hon the Earl of Woolton (1959), 418Google Scholar.

25 Bentinck, had first harried Peel for having ‘chased and hunted’ Canning to death: Hansard 3s, 8 06 1846, LXXXVII, cols 177–84Google Scholar. Then Disraeli repeated the charge a few nights later: see Gash, Norman, Sir Robert Peel (2 vols., 1972), II, 595–8Google Scholar.

26 Pellew, George, The Life and Correspondence of the Rt Hon Henry Addington, First Viscount Sidmouth (3 vols. 1847)Google Scholar. For Croker's, anonymous review, see the Quarterly Review (03 1847), vol. 79, 554–5Google Scholar.

27 Lowell, Herbert, ‘Conservative Reascendancy Considered’, Blackwood's (08 1854), 238–9Google Scholar. His age comes from the index entry in the Wellsley Index of Victorian Periodicals (ed. Houghton, Walter E.), vol I (Toronto, 1966), 98Google Scholar. Derby had, of course, defected from the Whigs over the Irish Church issue in 1835. Disraeli's initial posture as a ‘Radical’ candidate in the 1830s must be what Lowell has in mind in his case.

28 Kebbel, T.E., Toryism, 298nGoogle Scholar.

29 Kebbel, ibid., 157.

30 Cecil, Hugh, Conservatism (1912), 68–9Google Scholar.

31 Hill, F.H., George Canning (1887), 218Google Scholar.

32 Temperley, H.W.V., Canning (1905), 10, 268Google Scholar.

33 Butler, J. R. M., The Passing of the Great Reform Bill (1914), 94Google Scholar.

34 Butler, ibid., 46.

35 The latter phrase was still echoing around his rooms in Trinity as late as the early 1970s, as members of his unforgettable graduate seminar in Cambridge will readily recall.

36 Clark, G. Kitson, Peel and the Conservative Party (1928), 3Google Scholar.

37 Brock, W. R., Lord Liverpool and Liberal Toryism 1820 to 1827 (1941, 1967), prefaceGoogle Scholar.

38 Brock, , op. cit., 229Google Scholar.

39 Hobsbawm, E.J. and Ranger, T., The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar.

40 Cecil, Hugh, Conservatism, 170Google Scholar.

41 Cosgrave, , Thatcher, 20Google Scholar.

42 Patten, Chris, The Tory Case (1983), 16Google Scholar.

43 The Disraelian revision began most prominently with Smith, Paul, DisraeUan Conservatism and Social Reform (1967)Google Scholar. Baldwin came under severe reconsideration in Middlemas, Keith and Barnes, John, Baldwin (1969)Google Scholar; see, more recently, Williamson, Philip, ‘The Doctrinal Politics of Stanley Baldwin’ in Public and Private Doctrine: essays in British history presented to Maurice Cowling (ed.) Bentley, Michael, (Cambridge, 1993), 181–208Google Scholar. Neville Chamberlain's social-reform credentials are upheld largely in the first volume of Dilks, David, Neville Chamberlain (Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar. Butler has yet to receive an astringent treatment; perhaps there is little evidence to be astringent about.

44 Smith, op. cit.; but cf. Ghosh, Peter, ‘Disraelian Conservatism: a financial approach’, English Historical Review, (1984), 268–96Google Scholar.

45 Glickman, Harvey, ‘The Toryness of English Conservatism’, Journal of British Studies, I (1961)Google Scholar esp. 124 and 129: ‘Whereas Liberals begin with individuals, Tories begin with orders and classes. This is the key to the labyrinth of Tory beliefs.’ (129).

46 See Marwick, Arthur, ‘Middle Opinion in the Thirties: planning, progress and political “agreement”’, English Historical Review, LXXTX (1964), 285–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 The Next Fine Years (1935), 5. On PEP and its related legacies, see Pinder, John (ed.), Fifty Tears of Political and Economic Planning: looking forward 1931–81 (1981)Google Scholar.

48 A wide-ranging review of the relationship between Liberalism and organicism in political mought has been underway in a complex historiography over recent years. For some instances, see Freeden, Michael, The New Liberalism: an ideology of social reform (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar and Collini, Stephan, Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and political argument in England (Cambridge, 1979)Google Scholar. Some lines of argument are suggested in Bentley, Michael, The Climax of Liberal Politics i868–1918 (1987)Google Scholar.

49 Macmillan to Churchill, 1 January 1928, in Gilbert, Martin, Winston S. Churchill, V (1976), 261–2Google Scholar.

50 ‘Such a fusion, under the heat generated by Lloyd George's energy and resourcefulness, would, they say and will say, have produced a healthier alternative party to Labour than the personal ascendancy which Baldwin was to win over a great body of non-partisan Liberal opinion in the constituencies. It would not have left a rump Liberal party struggling to retain a foothold in the House of Commons, but would have prepared a fold wide enough to receive the whole party on Asquith's death.’ Percy, Lord Eustace, Some Memories (1958), 86–7Google Scholar.

51 diary, Clark, 10 02 1987, Diaries, 158Google Scholar.

52 Clarendon to Reeve, 21 Dec. 1858, quoted in Hawkins, Angus, Parliament, Party and the Art of Politics in Britain, 1855–1859, (1987), 166Google Scholar.

53 Sparrow, See, ‘RAB’, 234Google Scholar.

54 Oakeshott, , ‘Contemporary British Polities’, Cambridge Journal, I (1947–1949), 488–9Google Scholar.

55 Feiling, Keith, ‘Principles of Conservatism’, Political Quarterly, (1935), 131Google Scholar.

56 Cecil, Viscount of Chelwood, , All the Way (1949), 107Google Scholar.

57 Sanders diary, 13 Nov. 1913, in Ramsden, John (ed.), Real Old Tory Politics, (1984), 67Google Scholar.

58 Marriott, J. A. R., Memories of Four Score Tears (1946), 188Google Scholar.

59 White, R.J., The Conservative Tradition (1950), 2Google Scholar.

60 William Bridgeman to M. C. Bridgeman, 9 Dec. 1923, in Williamson, Philip (ed.), The Modernisation of Conservative Politics (19), 174Google Scholar.

61 Crawford diary, 19 Nov. 1931, in Vincent, John (ed.) The Crawford Papers: the journals of David Lindsey, twenty-seventh Earl of Crawford and tenth Earl of Balcarres, 1871–1940 (Manchester, 1984), 543Google Scholar. Cf. ibid., 10 Octob. 1922; ‘I hate these discussions about leadership and electioneering’ (449).

62 Sanders Diary, 6 Apr. 1911 and 8 Jul. 1913, ibid., 27, 65.

63 ibid., 18 Jul. 1911, 30; Cecil, , All the Way, 13Google Scholar.

64 The Times, 12 Oct. 1987.

65 Quoted in Cosgrave, , Thatcher, 64Google Scholar.

66 Northam, Reginald, Conservatism (1939), 40Google Scholar.

67 Gilmour, , Inside Right, 132Google Scholar.

68 Hogg, , The Case for Conservatism, 10Google Scholar. Patten's list of proper things to do (wry in face of recent prosecutions of Tory notables) therefore has a certaindeja vu: ‘books, music, pictures, work, friendship, admiring fine buildings and the countryside, enjoyment, having and bringing up a family.’ The Tory Case, 22.

69 Case for Conservatism, 13.

70 See Bentley, Michael, ‘Liberal Politics and the Grey Conspiracy of 1921’, Historical Journal (1977), 461–78Google Scholar.

71 Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modem Europe (Cambridge, 1987, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, comments on some case-studies. In general I have in mind the work of John Pocock, Quentin Skinner and those influenced by them since the 1960s.