Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:59:03.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against ‘Englishness’: English Culture and the Limits to Rural Nostalgia, 1850–1940*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Peter Mandler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

OVER the last fifteen years, a substantial literature has welled up, practically from nowhere, purporting to anatomise ‘Englishness’. ‘Englishness’, this literature suggests, is not a true estimate of national character, an enduring national essence, but rather a historical construct that was developed towards the end of the nineteenth century by the ‘dominant classes’ in British society in order to tame or thwart the tendencies of their day towards modernism, urbanism and democracy that might otherwise have overwhelmed elite culture. These aspirations for social control determined the lineaments of the new ‘Englishness’. Nostalgic, deferential and rural, ‘Englishness’ identified the squire-archical village of Southern or ‘Deep’ England as the template on which the national character had been formed and thus the ideal towards which it must inevitably return. Purveyed by the ‘dominant classes’ to the wider culture by means of a potent array of educational and political instruments—ranging from the magazine Country Life to the folk-song fad to the National Trust to Stanley Baldwin's radio broadcasts—‘Englishness’ reversed the modernising thrust of the Indus-trial Revolution and has condemned late twentieth-century Britain to economic decline, cultural stagnation and social division.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 7 , December 1997 , pp. 155 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Marsh, Jan, Back to the Land: The Pastoral Impulse in England, from 1880 to 1914 (1982), 245–8Google Scholar.

2 (Cambridge, 1981).

3 To cite only the more conspicuous book-length studies: Colls, Robert and Dodd, Philip, eds., Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880–1920 (1986)Google Scholar; Shaw, Christopher and Chase, Malcolm, eds., The Imagined Past: History and Nostalgia (Manchester, 1989)Google Scholar; Daniels, Stephen, Fields of Vision: Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar; Boyes, Georgina, The Imagined Village: Culture, Ideology and the English Folk Revival (Manchester, 1993)Google Scholar; Bunce, Michael, The Countryside Ideal: Anglo-American Images of Landscape (1994)Google Scholar; Taylor, John, A Dream of England: Landscape, Photography and the Tourist's Imagination (Manchester, 1994)Google Scholar; Giles, Judy and Middleton, Tim, eds., Writing Englishness 1900–1950 (1995)Google Scholar.

4 Their number is legion, but two recent examples of intelligent books gratuitously incorporating the ‘Englishness’ thesis are Savage, Mike and Miles, Andrew, The Remaking of the British Working Class 1840–1940 (1994), 87–8Google Scholar; Sinha, Mrinalini, Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly Englishman’ and the ‘Effeminate Bengali’ in the Late Nineteenth Century (Manchester, 1995), 71. 183Google Scholar.

5 For criticisms of the cultural explanation for British economic ‘decline’, see Collins, Bruce and Robbins, Keith, eds., British Culture and Economic Decline (1990)Google Scholar; Rubinstein, W. D., Capitalism, Culture and Decline in Britain, 1750–1990 (1993)Google Scholar; Edgerton, David, Science, Technology and the British Industrial ‘Decline’, 1870–1970 (Cambridge, 1996)Google Scholar.

6 See, e.g., Nora, Pierre, ed., Les lieux de memoire (7 vols., Paris, 1984–1992), esp. vols. II, IIIGoogle Scholar; Green, Nicholas, The Spectacle of Nature: Landscape and Bourgeois Culture in Nineteenth-Century France (Manchester, 1990)Google Scholar; Applegate, Celia, A Nation of Provincials: The German Idea of Hetmat (Berkeley, 1990)Google Scholar; Choay, Françoise, L'allégorie du patrimoine (paris, 1992)Google Scholar. But the latter still adopts, on slender evidence, the conventional view that England has a nostalgic rather than (as in France) a progressive feeling for the past.

7 E.g. Waldo Emerson, Ralph, English Traits (Boston, 1857), 188–90Google Scholar; James, Henry, ‘In Warwickshire’, 1st pub. 1877, repr. in English Hours (1960), 136–7Google Scholar.

8 See the useful comparative discussion in M. Hohenberg, Paul and , Lynn Hollen Lees, The Making of Urban Europe 1000–1950 (1985), 217–26Google Scholar.

9 E.g. Altick, Richard, The English Common Reader (1957)Google Scholar; James, Louis, Fiction for the Working Man (1963)Google Scholar; Anderson, Patricia, The Printed Image and the Transformation of Popular Culture, 1790–1860 (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar. Unfortunately, cultural changes of this kind are rarely discussed in comparative perspective; but see Bann, Stephen, The Clothing of Clio: A Study of the Representation of History in Nineteenth-Century Britain and France (Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar, showing parallels at least with France that should give believers in ‘English exceptionalism’ some pause.

10 I provide evidence for these assertions in ‘“In the Olden Time”: Romantic History and English National Identity, 1820–1850’, A Union of Multiple Identities?, ed. Brockliss, Laurence and Eastwood, David (Manchester, 1997)Google Scholar, and The Fall and Rise of the Stately Home (1997), chs. 1–2.

11 ”Olive Anderson, ‘The Political Uses of History in Mid Nineteenth-Century England’, Past and Present, 36 (1967), 87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Hohenberg, and Lees, , Urban Europe, 254–5Google Scholar.

13 Holzner, Lutz, ‘The Role of History and Tradition in the Urban Geography of West Germany’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60 (1970), 315–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Avner Offer makes the point that the late Victorian attempt to create a ‘property-owning democracy’ in Britain, analogous to the peasant democracies of France and Germany, had inevitably to take an urban form. While he also devotes a chapter to elite pastoralism, he concludes, ‘The urban worker was not converted by the romantic impulse of Liberalism.’ Property and Politics, 1870–1914 (oxford, 1981), 148–50, 349.Google Scholar Like Marsh's Back to the Land, Offer's book reflects the more balanced view of pastoralism's place in British culture prevailing before the impact of Wiener.

15 Harris, Jose, Private Lives, Public Spirit: A Social History of Britain 1870–1914 (Oxford, 1993), 33Google Scholar.

16 Chancellor, Valerie E., History for their Masters: Opinion in the English History Textbook, 1800–1914 (Bath, 1970), 70–5Google Scholar.

17 Muthesius, Stefan, ‘The Origins of the German Conservation Movement’, in Planning for Conservation, ed. Kain, Roger (1981), 47Google Scholar; see also Otto, Christian F., ‘Modern Environment and Historical Continuity: The Heimatschutz Discourse in Germany’, Art Journal, 43 (1983), 148–57Google Scholar, and Applegate, Nation of Provincials.

18 Even in France, where centralising tendencies are sometimes alleged to have killed off such provincial initiatives, the latter were spurs to rather than overwhelmed by state action; see Brown, G. Baldwin, The Care of Ancient Monuments (Cambridge, 1905), 74–9Google Scholar, and Bercé, Françoise, ‘Arcisse de Caumont et Les Societes Savantes’, in Les lieux, ed. Nora, , III, 533–67Google Scholar.

19 For comparative studies of ‘degeneration’, showing it to be a pan-European phenomenon, see Lees, Andrew, Cities Perceived: Urban Society in European and American Thought, 1820–1940 (Manchester, 1985)Google Scholar, ch. 6; Pick, Daniel, Faces of Degeneration: A European Disorder, c. 1848–c1918 (cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar.

20 Hoffmann, Stanley, ‘Paradoxes of the French Political Community’, in Hoffman et al., In Search of France (Cambridge, MA, 1963), esp. 3–8Google Scholar. This line of thinking has been extended recently into a full-blown cultural indictment of the Third Republic remarkably similar to the ‘Englishness’ diagnosis: see Lebovics, Herman, True France: The Wars over Cultural Identity, 1900–1945 (1992)Google Scholar.

21 This comparison was made as early as 1935 by the agricultural expert SirHall, Daniel in his Rede Lecture, The Pace of Progress (Cambridge, 1935), esp. 12, 21–34Google Scholar.

22 Cf. Masterman, C. F. G., ‘The English City’, in England: A Nation, ed. Oldershaw, Lucian (1904), 64–6Google Scholar, and The Condition of England (1909), 82–3.

23 Masterman, , Condition of England, 201–2Google Scholar. Illustrations of just such contemporary idealisations of ‘peasants’ country' on the Continent can be found in Cachin, Francois, ‘Le paysage du peintre’, in Les lieux, ed. Nora, , II, 463–5, 475–6Google Scholar.

24 Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society, 1780–1950 (1958)Google Scholar, esp. chs. 6–7. See also Heyck, T.W., The Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England (1982), chs. 7–8Google Scholar, for a view largely uninfluenced by Wiener but which (against the grain of the general argument) throws him in at the last minute (p. 227).

25 Muthesius, Hermann, The English House (190–5), ed. Sharp, Dennis (Oxford, 1987), 27–30Google Scholar.

26 Wyndham to his mother, 9 09 1907: Mackail, J. W. and Wyndham, Guy, Life and Letters of George Wyndham (2 vols., 1925), II, 580–1Google Scholar.

27 Gillett, Paula, The Victorian Painter's World (Gloucester, 1990), 17, 68, 192–4Google Scholar; Minihan, Janet Oppenheim, The Nationalization of Culture (1977), 164–7Google Scholar.

28 In her novel, The Visits of Elizabeth.

29 Blomfield, Reginald, A Short History of Renaissance Architecture in England 1500–1800 (1900), 298–303Google Scholar.

30 Thompson, E. P., William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary (New York, 1976), 173–4Google Scholar.

31 Austin, Alfred, Haunts of Ancient Peace (1902), quotes at 19–21, 64–6, 142Google Scholar; Austin is cited as typical or influential by Wiener, , English Culture, 45, 49–50, a point then picked up by Wiener's imitators, e.g.Google ScholarBunce, , Countryside Ideal, 53Google Scholar; Brooker, Peter and Widdowson, Peter, ‘A Literature for England’, in Englishness, ed. Colls, and Dodd, , 126Google Scholar, 128. Twice in Colls and Dodd the Quarterly Review's praise for Austin as ‘a concrete individual Englishman’ is cited as evidence of his populist credentials.

32 I owe this analysis to Green, Peter, Kenneth Grahame (1959), 240–8Google Scholar.

33 For the significance attached to the fact that rural nostalgia could be found ‘across the political spectrum’, see Wiener, , English Culture, 42, 46Google Scholar; Boyes, , Imagined Village, 86 n.4Google Scholar.

34 For such claims, see Boyes, , Imagimd Village, 27–36, 63–5Google Scholar; Bunce, , Countryside Ideal, 13–14, 32–3Google Scholar. Dodd, ‘Englishness and National Culture’, makes similar claims for even less significant phenomena, such as the Edwardian campaign for a National Theatre which was (should it have to be pointed out?) a dismal failure.

35 Wiener, , English Culture, 68Google Scholar.

36 Peers, C.R. to Lord Beauchamp, 23 11 1912Google Scholar: Public Record Office, WORK 14/2270.

37 Ditt, Karl, ‘Nature Conservation in England and Germany 1900–70: Forerunner of Environmental Protection?’, Contemporary European History, 5 (1996), 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, notes the early failure of nature conservation in England as compared to Germany.

38 E.g. Madsen, Stephen Tschudi, Restoration and Anti-Restoration (oslo, 1976), 98, 102–3Google Scholar; Choay, , L'allegoru du patrimoine 114Google Scholar; Ditt, , ‘Nature Conservation’, 4Google Scholar. This particularly puzzles Continental writers today, who have been told that the English are a highly history-conscious people but who can see the far more palpable signs of this consciousness closer to home.

39 Light, Alison, Forever England: Femininity, Literature and Conservatism between the Wars (1991)Google Scholar, marks something of a breakthrough. But I want to pay tribute also to two earlier articles that rejected the simple-minded diagnosis of nostalgia: Lowerson, John, ‘Battles for the Countryside’, in Class, Culture and Social Change: A New View of the 1930s, ed. Gloversmith, Frank (Brighton, 1980), 258–80Google Scholar; Potts, Alex, ‘”Constable Country” between the Wars’, in Patriotism: The Making and Unmaking of British National Identity, III: National Fictions, ed. Samuel, Raphael (1989), 160–86Google Scholar.

40 Hall, Peter et al. , The Containment of Urban England (2 vols., 1973), I, 59–62Google Scholar. It is interesting that, pre-Wiener, Peter Hall's view was that interwar suburanisation was the ‘modern’; development, whereas the postwar containment was driven by elite nostalgia.

41 Jackson, Alan A., Semi-Detached London (Didcot, 1991), 96, 142Google Scholar.

42 Some of this is captured in Trentmann, Frank, ‘Civilisation and its Discontents: English Neo-Romanticism and the Transformation of Anti-Modernism in Twentieth-Century Western Culture’, Journal of Contemporary History, 29 (1994), 583–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar, though the author still leans excessively towards an ‘anti-modern’ interpretation of the outdoor movement. Similar conclusions could be reached about the pervasiveness on the Continent of other ruralist fashions, falsely supposed to be particularly English, such as angling or amateur landscape painting.

43 Joad, C.E.M., ‘The People’s Claim', in Britain and the Beast, ed. Williams-Ellis, Clough (1937), 71–2Google Scholar.

44 Mandler, , Fall and Rise, 295–308Google Scholar.

45 Joad, , ‘People’s Claim', 66–7Google Scholar.

46 Mandler, , Fall and Rise, 227–41Google Scholar.

47 J. R. Rose-Troup, Director of Talks, to W. E. G. Murray, Assistant Controller, 25 Nov. 1935: BBC Written Archives Centre, R51/425.

48 Citations of Baldwin's speech abound: e.g.Schwarz, Bill, ‘The Language of Constitutionalism: Baldwinite Conservatism’, in Formations of Nation and People (1984), 14–16Google Scholar; Wright, Patrick, On Using in an Old Country (1985), 82Google Scholar; Howkins, Alun, ‘The Discovery of Rural England’, in Englishness, ed. Colls, and Dodd, , 82Google Scholar; Street, Paul, ‘Painting Deepest England’, in Imagined Past, ed. Shaw, and Chase, , 68–9Google Scholar; Rich, Paul, ‘A Question of life and Death to England: Patriotism and the British Intellectuals, c. 1886–1945’, New Community, 15 (1988–1989), 501Google Scholar; Bunce, , Countryside Ideal, 34–5Google Scholar; Trentmann, , ‘Civilisation’;, 585Google Scholar.

49 Cooper, Andrew Fenton, British Agricultural Policy, 1912–36: A Study in Conservative Politics (Manchester, 1989), esp. 1–4Google Scholar, 64–71, 94.

50 Sheail, John, Rural Conservation in Inter-War Britain (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar, is an important book, but ultimately fails in my view to rehabilitate the 1932 Act; Mandler, cf. Peter, ‘Politics and the English Landscape since the First World War’, Huntington Library Quarterly, 55 (1992). 459–76Google Scholar.

51 Sir Lionel Earle to First Commissioner of Works, 12jan. 1927: Public Record Office, WORK 14/2312.

52 Memorandum, ‘Preservation of the Countryside’', prepared (probably by Evelyn Sharp) for the Town & Country Advisory Committee meeting of 12 Nov. 1937: Public Record Office, HLG 52/709.

53 Samuel, Raphael, Theatres of Memory (1994), 51–9Google Scholar.

54 Tomlinson, Jim, ‘Inventing “Decline”: The Falling Behind of the British Economy in the Postwar Years’, Economic History Review, 49 (1996), 731–57Google Scholar, charts the emergence of notions of economic decline in the 1950s and 60s, but with the cultural analysis still largely absent. Even the awareness of relative economic decline was, Tomlinson points out, masked by high absolute living standards.

55 Holzner, , ‘Role of History and Tradition’, 331Google Scholar.

56 It would be interesting to trace the rise of the cultural analysis of decline more closely; in an appendix to English Culture (167–70), Wiener notes the preponderance of economic analyses but also cites evidence of a culturalist backlash in works dating (though he does not point to this fact) from the early 1970s.