Article contents
War and Peace in the earlier Middle Ages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Extract
Men of the earlier Middle Ages knew what they meant by war and peace. Their definitions are not hard to find, even though, when found, they prove to be inconsistent. They knew that there were just and unjust wars, good kinds of peace and bad, and they could envisage war and peace as two poles of a single concept. My intention is not to survey this large and ramshackle field but simply to enquire how far some of the definitions tallied with the facts of war and peace; and whether, at the end, the pressures making for peace had affected the nature of war. To ask whether Western Europe in the days of King Alfred and the later Carolingians was more or less peaceful than it had been four centuries earlier is not very meaningful, since an entirely new situation was created by the attacks of the Vikings, Arabs and Magyars; but it is meaningful to ask whether four centuries of additional experience had caused men to look at war and peace in a different way.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1975
References
1 I have to thank Professor P. A. Brunt and my son Andrew for advice on the Roman view of warfare.
2 The text of De Rebus Bellicis is edited and translated by Thompson, E. A., A Roman reformer and inventor (Oxford, 1952)Google Scholar.
3 De Officiis, ed. Atzert, C. (Teubner, 4th edn., 1963), i, 34–40Google Scholar; i, 80–82: ii, 18; iii, 46, 88.
4 According to Vismara, Giulio, ‘Problemi storici e istituti giuridici della guerra altomedievale’, Settimane di Studio del Centra Italiano di Studi sull' Alto Medioevo, xv (2) (Spoleto, 1968), p. 1162Google Scholar, the Eastern Empire clung to an imperial doctrine that all war was legitimate if initiated by the emperor; but this needs qualification.
5 I here follow Gina Fasoli, ‘Pace e guerra nell'alto medioevo’, ibid., xv(i), to whose paper I am generally indebted.
6 De Re Militari, ed. Schwebel, N. (Strasbourg, 1806), iiiGoogle Scholar, prol.
7 See e.g. Deut. 7:21; 9:1; 20:16; 28:47; Numb. 21:14; 1 Chron. 10:11, 27.
8 Deut., 20:4.
9 Germania, ed. Anderson, J. C. G. (Oxford, 1938), 7, 1Google Scholar.
10 Cf. my ‘The bloodfeud of the Franks’;, in The Long-Haired Kings (London, 1962)Google Scholar.
11 Cf. Green, D. H., The Carolingian Lord (Cambridge, 1965), p. 279Google Scholar.
12 Libri Historiarum, ed. Krusch, B. and Levison, W., Mon. Germ. Hist., Script. Rer. Mero. (Hanover, 1951), ii, 27Google Scholar.
13 Historia Langobardorum, ed. Waitz, G., Script. Rer. Germ. in usum schol. (Hanover, 1890) ii, 35Google Scholar.
14 Leges, cap. 118, Die Gesetze der Langobarden, ed. Beyerle, F. (Weimar, 1947)Google Scholar.
15 Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte (2nd edn., Berlin, repr. 1958), ii, sections 65, 66.
16 Pollock, F. and Maitland, F. W., The History of English Law before the time of Edward I (Cambridge, 1895), ii, p. 452Google Scholar; see also i, pp. 22, 23.
17 De Civitate Dei, ed Welldon, J. E. C. (London, 1924), xixGoogle Scholar, cap. 7.
18 Etymologiarum sive Originum Libb., ed. Lindsay, W. M. (Oxford, 1911)Google Scholar, Bk. 18.
19 Cf. Vismara, , ‘Problemi storici e istituti giuridici della guerra altomedievale’ p. 1152Google Scholar.
20 Werner, J., Settimane di Studio, xv(1), p. 101Google Scholar.
21 See the discussion by Bodmer, J-P., Der Krieger der Merowingerzeit und seine Welt (Zürich, 1957)Google Scholar.
22 Lib. Hist., ii, 37.
23 Bachrach, Bernard S., Merovingian Military Organization, 481—751 (Minneapolis, 1972)Google Scholar, discusses the composition of Frankish armies but makes too much of local levies.
24 Fredegar, , Chronicorum Libri, ed. Krusch, B., Mon. Germ. Hist., Script. Rer. Mero., ii (Hanover, 1888)Google Scholar, and J. M. Wallace-Hadrill (London, 1960), iv, 68.
25 On the contrast see Sprandel, Rolf, Der merovingische Adel und die Gebiete östlich des Rheins (Freiburg im B., 1957)Google Scholar.
26 Cf. Bergengruen, A., Adel und Grundherrschaft im Merowingerreich (Wiesbaden, 1958)Google Scholar.
27 Werner, J., Das alamannische Fürstengrab von Wittislingen (Munich, 1950), pp. 75–77Google Scholar.
28 See Fritze, Wolfgang H., ‘Universalis gentium confessio’, Frühmittelalterliche Studien, 3 (1969), pp. 88 ffGoogle Scholar.
29 Ecclesiastical History, ed. and trs. Colgrave, B. and Mynors, R. A. B. (Oxford, 1969), ii, 16Google Scholar.
30 Ibid., ii, 9.
31 Ibid., ii, 12.
32 Ibid., iii, 24.
33 ibid., iv, 26.
34 Baedae opera historica, ed. Plummer, C. (Oxford, 1896), i, p. 415Google Scholar.
35 Colgrave, and Mynors, , Eccl. Hist., v, 23Google Scholar.
36 Ibid., iii, 2.
37 Ibid., iii, 6.
38 Ibid., iii, 9.
39 Ibid., iii, 18.
40 Ibid., iii, 24.
41 Colgrave and Mynors, iii,29.
42 Matth. 6: 33; Luc. 12: 31.
43 Isaiah, 11:10.
44 Eccl. Hist., iv, 2.
45 Ibid., iv, 26.
46 On which see Cross, J. E., ‘The ethic of war in Old English’, England before the Conquest, ed. Clemoes, Peter and Hughes, Kathleen (Cambridge, 1971), pp. 277–78Google Scholar.
47 Mon. Germ. Hist., Epist. vii (Karo. Aev., iv), no. 54, p. 351.
48 Cf. Cross, , ‘The ethic of war in Old English’, pp. 280–81Google Scholar.
49 Gregory, of Tours, , Hist. Libb., ii, 30, 31Google Scholar.
50 Procopius, , Gothic War, ed. Dewing, H. B., vii, xxi, 7–11Google Scholar.
51 See Green, , The Carolingian Lord, esp. pp. 279–97Google Scholar.
52 Smith, A. H., Three Northumbrian Poems (London, 1933), pp. 12ffGoogle Scholar.
53 Gregorii I Registri, Mon. Germ. Hist., Epist. i, no. 73, p. 93.
54 Die Entstehung des Kreuzzugsgedankens (Stuttgart, 1935), pp. 16Google Scholarff.
55 Cf. King Alfred's West-Saxon version of Gregory's Pastoral Care. ed. and trs., Sweet, Henry, Early English Text Soc., vols. 45, 50 (London, 1871)Google Scholar.
56 Vita Karoli Magni, ed. Holder–Egger, O., Script. Rer. Germ, in usum schol. (Hanover, 1911)Google Scholar, ch. 9.
57 Ibid., ch. 10.
58 Ibid.
59 Ibid., ch. 15.
60 ibid., ch. 16.
61 Vita Karoli Magni, ch. 17.
62 Ibid., ch. 22.
63 Ibid., ch. 31.
64 Fredegar, cont., ch. 13.
65 I defend this position in ‘The Vikings in Francia’ (Stenton Lecture, Reading, 1974).
66 By the poet of the Ludwigslied.
67 Ed. Haefele, H. F., Mon. Germ. Hist., Script. Rer. Germ., n.s. xii (Berlin, 1959)Google Scholar.
68 Ibid., p. 87.
69 Ermold le Noir, ed. Faral, Edmond (Paris, 1932), p. 2Google Scholar.
70 Mansi, , Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, xiv, 888Google Scholar.
71 Ermold le Noir, p. 32, line 369.
72 Ibid., 11. 376–79. The same etymology is in Isidore, , Etymol., ix, 11, 101Google Scholar.
73 Ibid., 1. 563, p. 44.
74 Ibid., 1. 572–5, p. 46.
75 Ibid., 11. 1322–3, p. 102.
76 Such is the contention of Vismara, , ‘Problemi storici e istituti giuridici della guerra altomedievale’, p. 1199Google Scholar.
77 See Sánchez-Albornoz, C., ‘El ejército y la guerra en el reino Asturléones’, Settimane di Studio, xv(1), pp. 293–428Google Scholar.
78 See the account in Eckel, A., Charles le Simple (Paris, 1899), pp. 123–27Google Scholar.
79 Mon. Germ. Hist., Scriptores, xv, 513.
80 Bede, , Eccl. Hist., iv, 21Google Scholar.
81 Pat. Lot., cxxvi, cols. 9–25.
82 Concilios Visigóticos e Hispano-Romanos, ed. Vives, José (Barcelona-Madrid, 1963), i, Toledo xiv, xiiGoogle Scholar.
83 Mon. Germ. Hist., Leges i, ed. Zeumer, K. (Hanover, 1902), ii, 1, iGoogle Scholar.
84 Ibid., i, 2, vi (‘Quod triumphet de hostibus lex’). Cf. King, P. D., Law and society in the Visigothic kingdom (Cambridge, 1972), pp. 33Google Scholar ff.
85 Greg. I Reg., pp. 320 ff. See Fichtenau, H., Arenga (Graz-Gologne, 1957), pp. 76ffGoogle Scholar.
86 Mon. Germ. Hist., Poetae Aevi Caro., iii, ed. Traube, L. (Berlin, 1896), p. 181Google Scholar(Ad Karolum regem, line 41).
87 Cf. Fasoli, Gina, ‘Pace e guerra nell'alto medioevo’, p. 45Google Scholar.
88 Pat. Lat. 119, col. 998.
89 Cf. Erdmann, , Die Entstehung des Kreuzzugsgedankens, pp. 53Google Scholarff.
- 5
- Cited by