Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:07:54.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SALADIN'S ‘SPIN DOCTORS’

Prothero Lecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2019

Carole Hillenbrand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We might flatter ourselves that the idea of a spin doctor is rather a modern one, but I wonder. Obviously enough, powerful rulers have always had their coterie of close advisers. But in the medieval Muslim world there is one outstanding example of something rather more than this: the team of three counsellors that Saladin assembled who watched over his interests and, crucially, his reputation, with unflagging devotion for decades. Two of them were, by any standard, intellectual stars who could have turned their multifarious talents in many directions but who chose rather to dedicate them to a man whom they not only admired but also loved. One of them, the poet ‘Imad al-Din al-Isfahani, was a Persian with a truly awesome command of Arabic, a gift which he delighted to exhibit in and out of season. His pyrotechnic performances, solid with metaphor, saturated with puns, wordplay, alliteration, assonance and verbal acrobatics, are such a nightmare to understand that generations of Western Orientalists – and indeed Arab scholars too, for that matter – have recoiled from the task of editing certain of his works. Sometimes in his writings manner eclipses matter, but he is also capable of reaching heights of solemn eloquence, as in his paean of triumph at the recapture of Jerusalem, or his threnody on the death of Saladin. The other, the Qadi al-Fadil – his title means ‘The Excellent Judge’ – though only a somewhat pedestrian poet, was an acknowledged master of the epistolary prose that was de rigueur in Islamic chanceries, and for centuries his letters were regarded as models of their genre. His appearance, hunchbacked and skeletal, made him the butt of the court's satirical poets, but his political skills were beyond reproach, and indeed in his master's absence he governed Egypt for a time. It has been said that biography adds an extra terror to death, but in that respect Saladin need not have worried. For Ibn Shaddad, the third member of this distinguished triumvirate, who joined the team after the fall of Jerusalem but thereafter never left Saladin's side and therefore saw him in good times and bad, was a plain man with a plain style. But he rose to the occasion and crafted a biography of his hero Saladin that lets the facts speak for themselves. He has no time for stale panegyric; instead, his admiration for Saladin shines through his account at every turn, and it is he who laid the foundations for his master's posthumous celebrity. The lecture will explore the impact of these three men on the Saladin legend, which transformed a minor Kurdish warlord into an emblem of chivalry, piety and military glory which captured the hearts and the imaginations of Muslims for centuries to come – and still does.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 29 , December 2019 , pp. 65 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Minorsky, Vladimir, Studies in Caucasian History (1953), 107–57Google Scholar.

2 See Eddé, Anne-Marie, Saladin (Paris, 2008)Google Scholar; Eddé, Anne-Marie, Saladin, trans. Todd, Jane Marie (Cambridge, MA, 2011)Google Scholar.

3 See Jonathan Phillips, The Life and Legend of the Sultan Saladin (2019).

4 Ehrenkreutz, Andrew, Saladin (Albany, 1972)Google Scholar; Peter Holt, The Age of the Crusades: The Near East from the Eleventh Century to 1517 (1986).

5 Elisséeff, Nikita, Un grand prince musulman de Syrie au temps des Croisades (2 vols., Damascus, 1967)Google Scholar.

6 The great medieval Muslim historian Ibn al-Athir (d. 1233), who wrote in detail about the Crusading period, was clearly biased in favour of Nur al-Din and his Zengid dynasty and he was discreetly critical of Saladin; al-Athir, Ibn, Tar'ikh al-dawla al-atabakiyya, ed. Tulaymat, ‘Abdul Kader (Cairo, 1963)Google Scholar.

7 Hadia Raghib Dajani-Shakeel, ‘Al-Qadi al-Fadil. His Life and Political Career’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, 1972).

8 The Arabic text of this document is given in Helbig, Adolph H., Al-Qadi al-Fadil, der Wezir Saladins (Leipzig, 1908), 53–64Google Scholar.

9 Khallikan, Ibn, Wafayat al-a'yan, trans. de Slane, W. M. as Ibn Khallikan's Biographical Dictionary (4 vols., Paris, 1843–71), II, 112Google Scholar.

10 Kitab al-fath al-qussi fi'l fath al-qudsi, ed. C. Landberg (Leiden, 1888). Note the rhyming and punning title of this work. See also al-Isfahani, ‘Imad al-Din, Conquête de la Syrie, trans. Massé, H. (Paris, 1972)Google Scholar.

11 Gabrieli comments that this is an important author for Saladin's life but he adds that concrete details are lost in a complicated mass of verbiage; Francesco Gabrieli, Arab Historians of the Crusades (1969), xxx.

12 For a detailed biography of Baha’ al-Din Ibn Shaddad, see Ibn Khallikan's Biographical Dictionary, trans. de Slane, IV, 417–35.

13 Shaddad, Baha’ al-Din Ibn, The Rare and Excellent History of Saladin or al-Nawadir al-Sultaniyya wa'l-Mahasin-al-Yusufiyya, trans. Richards, D. S. (Aldershot, 2001), 81Google Scholar.

14 Ibn Khallikan's Biographical Dictionary, trans. de Slane, IV, 541.

15 Ibn Shaddad, The Rare and Excellent History of Saladin, 243–4.

16 Ibn Shaddad, Baha’ al-Din, Al-nawadir al-sultaniyya, ed. El-Shayyal, J. (Cairo, 1964)Google Scholar.

17 Dajani-Shakeel, Hadia, Al-Qadi al-Fadil ‘Abd al-Rahim al-‘Asqalani (Beirut, 1993), 54Google Scholar.

18 Ibn Khallikan's Biographical Dictionary, trans. de Slane, II, 112; Ibrahim Hafsi, ‘Correspondance officielle et privée d'al-Qadi al-Fadil’ (4 vols., Thèse Université de Paris 3, 1980).

19 Al-Bundari, , Sana’ al-barq al-shami, ed. Sesṣen, R. (Beirut, 1971), 233–7Google Scholar.

20 Diwan al-Qadi al-Fadil, ed. A. Badawi and I. al-Ibyari (Cairo, 1961).

21 Dajani-Shakeel, Al-Qadi al-Fadil, 17.

22 Ibid., 26.

23 Lyons, Malcolm C. and Jackson, David E. P., Saladin. The Politics of the Holy War (Cambridge, 1982), 118Google Scholar.

24 Al-Wahrani, Manamat al-Wahrani, quoted by Dajani-Shakeel, Al-Qadi al-Fadil, 27.

25 Ibn Khallikan's Biographical Dictionary, trans. de Slane, IV, 515ff.

26 For a detailed analysis of the writing of ‘Imad al-Din al-Isfahani, see Richter-Bernburg, Lutz, Der Syrische Blitz. Saladins Sekretär zwischen Selbstdarstellung und Geschichtsschreibung (Beirut, 1990), esp. 257–382Google Scholar, where passages of the text are translated.

27 Cahen, Claude, ‘Review of ʿImad al-Din al-Isfahani. tr. Henri Massé, Conquête de la Syrie et de la Palestine par Saladin’, Arabica, 21 (1974), 213–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 See Holt, P. M.'s review of Henri Massé’s translation of Al-fath al-qussi, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 37 (1974), 691–3Google Scholar.

29 For a balanced account of ‘Imad al-Din al-Isfahani, see Richards, Donald S., ‘‘Imad al-Din al-Isfahani: Administrator, Littérateur and Historian’, in Crusaders and Muslims in Twelfth-Century Syria, ed. Shatzmiller, Maya (Leiden, 1993), 133–46Google Scholar.

30 This phrase is Gabrieli's in Arab Historians, 204, n. 2.

31 Trans. Gabrieli, Arab Historians, 204.

32 Al-Bundari, Sana’ al-barq al-shami, 244.

33 Gabrieli, Arab Historians, 134.

34 In the detailed introduction to his translation of Baha’ al-Din Ibn Shaddad, Richards explains the structure of the book; see The Rare and Excellent History of Saladin, 1–9.

35 Ibid., 243.

36 Quoted by Lyons and Jackson, Saladin, 374.

37 Dajani-Shakeel, Al-Qadi al-Fadil, 1.