Article contents
The Republic and the Iron Chancellor: the Pattern of Franco-German Relations, 1871–1890
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
Extract
A few years ago I commented in an article on the European catastrophe of 1870, viewed in the long perspective of relations between the French and the Germans down to that date. My present lecture embodies a comment on the international consequences of 1870 during the twenty years which followed it. I hope in time to come to pursue the theme of Franco-German relations further down the slope of time, as far as the end of the Second World War.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1979
References
1 ‘The War of 1870 in the Pattern of Franco-German Relations’, Renaissance and Modern Studies', xviii (1974), 77–125Google Scholar.
2 Gooch, G. P., Franco-German Relations, 1871–1914 (Creighton Lecture, 1923), republished New York, 1967, pp. 4–5Google Scholar.
3 Howard, M., The Franco-Prussian War (London, 1967), pp. 446–8Google Scholar:
4 Taylor, A. J. P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918 (London, 1971), p. 282, n. 1Google Scholar.
5 Bismarck to Bernstorff (London), 21 August 1870 (Cited by Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 217Google Scholar).
6 Grenville, J. A. S., Europe Re-shaped, 1848–1878 (London, 1976), p. 356Google Scholar.
7 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 217Google Scholar.
8 Fryer, , ‘The War of 1870’, 79–80, 91 and n. 3Google Scholar.
9 Howard, , Franco-Prussian War, pp. 249–56Google Scholar.
10 Fryer, , ‘The War of 1870’, 98–110, 124–5Google Scholar.
11 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, pp. 217–18Google Scholar; cf. the same author's Bismarck (London, 1961), p. 88Google ScholarPubMed.
12 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 218Google Scholar.
13 Mann, G., Deutsche Geschichte des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts (Frankfurt, 1958)Google Scholar: English trans, by Jackson, Marian, History of Germany since 1789 (London, 1968), pp. 228–9Google Scholar.
14 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 396Google Scholar.
15 Ritter, G., Staatskunst und Kriegshandwerk, 2te Band (2nd edn., Munich, 1965)Google Scholar: English trans, by Norden, Heinz, The Sword and the Sceptre, vol. ii (London, 1972), pp. 81–2Google Scholar.
16 But cf. Taylor, , Bismarck, pp. 213–14Google Scholar.
17 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 217, n. 3Google Scholar.
18 Girardet, R., La société militaire dans la France contemporaine, 1815–1939 (Paris, 1953), p. 172Google Scholar and ch. V.
19 Halévy, D., La fin des notables, ii (Paris, 1937), 351–2Google Scholar.
20 On Bismarck's motives, see Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 253 and n. 2Google Scholar; Bismarck, pp. 170–1.
21 de Gaulle, Charles, La France et son armée (Paris, 1938): edn. ‘Livres de Poche’, p. 198Google Scholar.
22 Ibid., pp. 198–202; Ritter, , Sword and the Sceptre, ii, 19–20Google Scholar.
23 Girardet, , Société militaire, pp. 181–3Google Scholar.
24 de Gaulle, , La France, p. 206Google Scholar; Girardet, , Société militaire, p. 181Google Scholar.
25 de Gaulle, , La France, pp. 205–6Google Scholar.
26 Girardet, , Société militaire, p. 183Google Scholar.
27 de Gaulle, , La France, p. 208Google Scholar.
28 Girardet, , Société militaire, p. 184Google Scholar.
29 Ibid., pp. 161–66, 168–71, 174–7.
30 Ibid., pp. 177–81.
31 de Gaulle, , La France, pp. 212–13Google Scholar.
32 According to Bismarck's circular of 27 September 1870, Favre at Ferrières called Strasbourg ‘der Schlüssel des Hauses’ (cf. Louis XIV's medal, 1681, Gallia clausa Germanis). Bismarck rejoined by describing it ‘als der Schlüssel unseres Hauses’ (Cited by Howard, , Franco-Prussian War, p. 232, n. 1Google Scholar. The italics are mine).
33 My much respected colleague at Nottingham, K. C. Edwards, Professor of Geography, confirmed me in this view.
34 More than ‘sentiment’ (Howard, , Franco-Prussian War, p. 448Google Scholar), was involved.
35 de Gaulle, , La France, pp. 207–8Google Scholar.
36 Ritter, , Sword and the Sceptre, ii, 194–200Google Scholar.
37 Albert, duc de Broglie, Un ambassadeur de la vaincue (based on the papers and diaries of the Vicomte de Gontaut-Biron): English trans, by Vandam, A. D., An Ambassador of the Vanquished (London, 1896), pp. 8–11Google Scholar, 14.
38 Broglie, , An Ambassador, pp. 275–9Google Scholar.
39 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 6–10Google Scholar; Girardet, , Société militaire, pp. 173–4Google Scholar; cf., however Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 283Google Scholar.
40 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 10–11Google Scholar.
41 Gontaut, (in Broglie, An Ambassador, pp. 20–1, 25–6)Google Scholar; on Moltke, see Ritter, , Sword and the Sceptre, i, pp. 67 ff and ii, pp. 196–8Google Scholar; cf. Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 11Google Scholar, and Broglie, , An Ambassador, p. 27Google Scholar.
42 Broglie, , An Ambassador, pp. 109–14Google Scholar.
43 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 10Google Scholar.
44 For the contemporary French case against Bismarck in the ‘War scare’, see Broglie, , An Ambassador, pp. 165–239Google Scholar. For an historian's case against him, see Fuller, J. V., ‘The War Scare of 1875’, American Historical Review, xxiv (1919)Google Scholar. On his personal responsibility, see Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 225Google Scholar and Grenville, , Europe Re-shaped, p. 382Google Scholar. But cf. Taylor's, unsympathetic and, to me, perverse treatment of the policy of Decazes (Struggle for Mastery, pp. 224–7)Google Scholar.
45 Broglie, , An Ambassador, pp. 101–4Google Scholar.
46 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 11Google Scholar.
47 Broglie, , An Ambassador, pp. 235–6Google Scholar.
48 Bainville, Jacques, La Troisième République: English trans, by Miles, Hamish, The French Republic (London, 1936), pp. 52–6Google Scholar, 65; Halévy, , La fin des notables, ii, 304–318Google Scholar.
49 Halévy, , La fin des notables, ii, 303–4, 311–315Google Scholar.
50 Well summarized by Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 17–19Google Scholar. But was Gambetta (p. 17) then ‘the greatest of French citizens’?
51 Bismarck to St.-Vallier, January 1879 (Cited by Gooch, , Franco-German. Relations, p. 16Google Scholar).
52 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, pp. 293–4Google Scholar; cf. pp. 282–3.
53 Girardet, , Société militaire, pp. 169, 245–6Google Scholar; cf. Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 17Google Scholar, on St.-Hilaire, Foreign Secretary in Ferry's first administration.
54 Bainville, , Third Republic, p. 91Google Scholar; see Taylor, , ‘The Secret of the Third Republic’, Taylor, A. J. P., Europe: Grandeur and Decline (London, 1967), p. 149Google Scholar, and ‘French North Africa’, Taylor, A. J. P., From Napoleon to Stalin (London, 1950)Google Scholar.
55 Bainville, , Third Republic, pp. 91–2Google Scholar.
56 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 22–3Google Scholar.
57 Declarations of the Brissot and Freycinet governments in this sense were cited by Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 24Google Scholar.
58 It was Clemenceau who had united ‘Jacobin’ Republicans and the Right behind his own impassioned réquisitoire against the ‘unpatriotic’ Ferry.
59 Taylor, (Struggle for Mastery, pp. 282–3)Google Scholar is right to emphasize that colonial expansion was unpopular in France for its own sake: but the militant patriots both shared in, and added something to, mere anti-colonialism.
60 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, pp. 301, 308–310Google Scholar; Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 27Google Scholar.
61 Bainville, , Third Republic, p. 101Google Scholar.
62 Guedalla, P., The Two Marshals: Bazaine, Pétain (London, 1943), p. 264Google Scholar.
63 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 25Google Scholar.
64 Bourgeois, E., Manuel historique de politique étrangère, iv (Paris, 1925), 33Google Scholar.
65 Cited by Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 28–9Google Scholar.
66 Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, pp. 308–9Google Scholar.
67 Bainville, , Third Republic, pp. 99–100Google Scholar; Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 29Google Scholar.
68 My colleague at Nottingham, Dr Derek Spring, urges that the inspector's arrest was only the second ‘high point’ of the crisis, the first being in January. He points specially to Count Peter Schuvalov's approach, in the New Year, to Berlin, offering Russia's friendly neutrality in a fresh Franco-German war if Germany would show similar good will to Russia in her Balkan difficulties; and to Bismarck's eager acceptance of the draft (which, however, the Russian Emperor rejected). But it does not follow that Bismarck would have used this agreement for anything but ‘psychological’ warfare against France. There were no German military plans for another offensive westwards.
69 Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 29–30Google Scholar.
70 Bainville, , Third Republic, p. 101Google Scholar; Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 30Google Scholar.
71 Ritter, , Sword and the Sceptre, ii, 196–9Google Scholar; Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, p. 309Google Scholar.
72 Cited by Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, p. 26Google Scholar.
73 Economiste français, 7 May 1881: cited by Carroll, E. M., French Public Opinion and Foreign Affairs, 1870–1914 (New York, 1931), repr. F. Cass & Co., London, n.d., pp. 87–8Google Scholar.
74 de Gaulle, , La France, pp. 201–2Google Scholar.
75 Brogan, D. W., The French Nation: from Napoleon to Pétain (London, 1961), p. 197Google Scholar.
76 de Gaulle, , La France, p. 207Google Scholar.
77 Brogan, , The French Nation, pp. 182–3Google Scholar; Henderson, W. O., The Rise of German Indus-trial Power, 1834–1914 (London, 1975), pp. 140, 159, 142Google Scholar.
78 Valuable data and comments in Taylor, , Struggle for Mastery, pp. xxiv–xxxGoogle Scholar.
79 Hohenlohe's diary, 10 Nov. 1886 (Cited by Gooch, , Franco-German Relations, pp. 26–7Google Scholar).
- 1
- Cited by