No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2009
The cabinet in Great Britain is an emanation of the privy council. The councils in the royal colonies upon the American mainland, like those in the West Indies, were, in the language of the royal instructions to colonial Governors, ‘our’ councils, and at the beginning of the eighteenth century there was a prospect of a like development overseas. Yet it did not occur. The offspring of the colonial council in America is the senate of the United States. That body, like the colonial councils, has both legislative and executive functions. At the start it numbered a mere twenty-six members; and it was expected that the president, following the practice of colonial governors, would seek its advice in the discharge of his office. His cabinet had a quite different pedigree. It was envisaged in 1787 as something ‘[our Government] has always wanted, but never yet had.’ But it was, and still is, a meeting, not of ministers having seats in one or other of the houses of the legislature and collectively responsible to it, but of heads of departments individually responsible to the president. And it was historically, not a cabinet after the English model in a state of arrested development, but paradoxically a device of the legislature adapted to a presidential system. Why, it may be of interest to enquire, did this happen?
page 161 note 1 Labaree, L. W. (ed.), Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors, 1660–1776 (2 vols. New York, 1935), i. 20–30Google Scholar.
page 161 note 2 Learned, H. B., The President's Cabinet (New Haven, 1912), p. 85Google Scholar.
page 161 note 3 Cit., ibid., p. 91.
page 162 note 1 Pares, R., King George III and the Politicians (Oxford, 1953), p. 154Google Scholar.
page 162 note 1 Aspinall, A., ‘The cabinet council, 1783–1835’, Proc. of the British Academy, 1952 (1954), pp. 175–6Google Scholar.
page 162 note 3 Turner, E. R., The Cabinet Council of England in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, 1622–1784 (2 vols. Baltimore, 1930–1932), p. 72Google Scholar; cf. pp. 72–4, 106, 109, 136, 139–40, 140, 149–50.
page 163 note 1 Pares, , op. cit., p. 153Google Scholar.
page 163 note 2 Ibid., pp. 154–6.
page 163 note 3 Aspinall, , art. cit., p. 214Google Scholar.
page 163 note 4 Farrand, M. (ed.), The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (revd. ed. 4 vols. New Haven, 1937), i. 97Google Scholar; ii, 80, 329, 367, 499, 541–3.
page 163 note 5 Adams, G. B., ‘Magna Carta and the responsible ministry’, Am. Hist. Rev., xx (1915), 758–9Google Scholar.
page 164 note 1 Whitehead, W. A. (ed.), Documents relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey, vol. ivGoogle Scholar. Administrations of Governor Robert Hunter and President Lewis Morris. Archives of the State of New Jersey, 1st ser., vol. iv (Newark, N.J., 1882), p. 51Google Scholar.
page 165 note 1 Ibid., pp. 61–2.
page 165 note 2 Ibid., pp. 169–71.
page 165 note 3 Ibid., p. 183; cf. p. 331.
page 165 note 4 Ibid., p. 183 n. 1, cf. pp. 171 n. 1, 211.
page 165 note 5 Ibid., pp. 119–20.
page 166 note 1 Shepherd, W. R., History of Proprietary Government in Pennsylvania (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 16. New York, 1896), pp. 317, 318–19Google Scholar; Root, W. T., The Relations of Pennsylvania with the British Government, 1696–1765 (New York, 1912), p. 153Google Scholar.
page 166 note 2 Spencer, C. W., Phases of Royal Government in New York, 1691–1719 (Columbus, O., 1905), pp. 52, 67–8Google Scholar; Tanner, E. P., The Province of New Jersey, 1664–1738 (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 80. New York, 1908), pp. 221, 297Google Scholar; Fisher, E. J., New Jersey as a Royal Province, 1738 to 1776 (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 107. New York, 1911), p. 49Google Scholar; Whitehead, W. A. (ed.), Documents relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey, vol. vii, Archives of the State of New Jersey, 1st ser., vol. vii (Newark, N.J., 1883), p. 77Google Scholar; Shepherd, , op. cit., pp. 227, 235, 239, 283Google Scholar; Flippin, P. S., The Royal Government in Virginia, 1624–1775 (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 194. New York, 1919), pp. 205–6Google Scholar; Miller, E. I., The Legislature of the Province of Virginia (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 76. New York, 1907), pp. 99, 127, 129 n. 2, 136 n. 5Google Scholar; Raper, C. L., North Carolina. A Study in English Colonial Government (New York, 1904), p. 78Google Scholar; Smith, W. R., South Carolina as a Royal Province, 1719–1776 (New York, 1903), pp. 91–5, 289, 322–3Google Scholar; Labaree, L. W., Royal Government in America (New Haven, 1930), pp. 152–3Google Scholar.
page 167 note 1 Flippin, . op. cit., p. 206Google Scholar; Spencer, , op. cit., pp. 96, 155–6Google Scholar; Fisher, , op. cit., pp. 48–50, 106Google Scholar; Smith, , op. cit., pp. 93–4, 306, 314, 322–3Google Scholar.
page 167 note 2 Fry, W. H., New Hampshire as a Royal Province (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 79. New York, 1908), pp. 122–3, 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tanner, , op. cit., pp. 253, 278, 284, 288Google Scholar; Fisher, , op. cit., pp. 50–1, 57–8, 118–19Google Scholar; Whitehead, , op. cit., p. 138Google Scholar; Shepherd, , op. cit., pp. 261, 265, 271Google Scholar; Mereness, N. D., Maryland as a Proprietary Province (New York, 1901), pp. 178–9Google Scholar; Flippin, , op. cit., pp. 145, 156–7Google Scholar; Raper, , op. cit., pp. 77–81Google Scholar; Smith, , op. cit., pp. 335, 339Google Scholar.
page 167 note 3 Raper, , op. cit., p. 78Google Scholar.
page 167 note 4 Labaree, , Royal Government in America, p. 152Google Scholar.
page 168 note 1 Labaree, (ed.), Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors, i. 49Google Scholar.
page 168 note 2 Fry, , op. cit., p. 127Google Scholar.
page 168 note 3 Mereness, , op. cit., pp. 180–1Google Scholar.
page 168 note 4 Smith, , South Carolina as a Royal Province, pp. 322, 325–7, 371–8, 387–93, 400–1Google Scholar.
page 168 note 5 Shepherd, , History of Proprietary Government in Pennsylvania, pp. 317, 318–19Google Scholar.
page 168 note 6 Spencer, C. W., Phases of Royal Government in New York, 1691–1719 (Columbus, O., 1905), pp. 139–40Google Scholar; Smith, , op. cit., p. 326Google Scholar, cf. 238; McCrady, E., The History of South Carolina under the Royal Government, 1719–1776 (New York, 1899), pp. 285–8Google Scholar; cf. Osgood, H. L., The American Colonies in the Eighteenth Century (4 vols. New York, 1924), iii. 19Google Scholar; Labaree, , Royal Government in America, pp. 152–3Google Scholar.
page 168 note 7 Zeichner, O., Connecticut's Years of Controversy, 1750–1776 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1949), p. 48Google Scholar.
page 169 note 1 Fry, , op. cit., pp. 356–7Google Scholar.
page 169 note 2 Tanner, E. P., The Province of New Jersey, 1664–1738 (Columbia Univ. Studies, no. 80. New York, 1908), pp. 84, 169–72, 223, 227–8, 273, 286, 298Google Scholar.
page 169 note 3 Fisher, , New Jersey as a Royal Province, pp. 60, 103, 171Google Scholar.
page 169 note 4 Mereness, , Maryland as a Proprietary Province, pp. 296, 318–19Google Scholar.
page 169 note 5 Raper, , North Carolina, p. 219Google Scholar.
page 169 note 6 Smith, , op. cit., pp. 234–5, 330Google Scholar.
page 169 note 7 Fry, , New Hampshire as a Royal Province, p. 122Google Scholar; Zeichner, , Connecticut's Years of Controversy, pp. 126, 129, 310 n. 44, 324 n. 48Google Scholar; Tanner, , The Province of New Jersey, pp. 295–6Google Scholar; Mereness, , Maryland as a Proprietary Province, pp. 373, 384, 389, 470Google Scholar; Flippin, , The Royal Government in Virginia, pp. 92, 153, 159–60, 222, 223, 228, 245–9, 253–4, 257, 264, 268, 279, 322, 356–7, 358Google Scholar; Miller, , legislature of the Province of Virginia, p. 140Google Scholar; Smith, , South Carolina as a Royal Province, p. 87Google Scholar.
page 169 note 8 Smith, , op. cit., pp. 331–2, 347Google Scholar.
page 169 note 9 Labaree, (ed.), Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors, i. 15, 18, 19, 25, 1Google Scholar; Tanner, , op. cit., pp. 260, 277–8Google Scholar; Flippin, , op. cit., p. 258Google Scholar.
page 169 note 10 Mereness, , op. cit., pp. 394, 395Google Scholar.
page 169 note 11 Cf., e.g., Fisher, , op. cit., p. 450Google Scholar.
page 169 note 12 Tanner, , op. cit., pp. 331–2, 363, 450Google Scholar; Mereness, , op. cit., pp. 167, 213–14Google Scholar; Flippin, , op. cit., pp. 208–9, 214, 227, 358Google Scholar; Miller, , op. cit., pp. 56–8, 94Google Scholar; Smith, , op. cit., pp. 116, 117Google Scholar.
page 169 note 13 Mereness, , op. cit., pp. 190, 192–3Google Scholar.
page 170 note 1 Smith, , op. cit., pp. 87, 234–5, 330Google Scholar.
page 170 note 2 P.R.O., CO. 5/372, fo. 81; for a summary of the document, see Collections of the South Carolina Historical Society, ii (Charleston, S.C., 1858), pp. 303–5Google Scholar; cf. McCrady, , History of South Carolina under the Royal Government, pp. 182, 254–6, 258–9Google Scholar.
page 170 note 3 P.R.O., CO. 5/402, fo. 188.
page 171 note 1 P.R.O., CO. 5/372, fos. 84.–5
page 171 note 2 Smith, , op. cit., pp. 94–5Google Scholar.
page 171 note 3 Wallace, D. D., The History of South Carolina (3 vols. New York, 1934), i. 444Google Scholar; cf. Collections of the South Carolina Historical Society, ii (Charleston, S.C., 1858), p. 286Google Scholar.
page 172 note 1 Whitehead, W. A. (ed.), Documents relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey, vol. vii, Archives of the State of New Jersey, 1st. ser, vol. vii (Newark, N.J., 1883), pp. 183–4Google Scholar.
page 173 note 1 Ibid., pp. 185–8.
page 173 note 2 Cf. Greene, E. B., The Provincial Governor in the English Colonies of North America (New York, 1898), pp. 76–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 174 note 1 Labaree, (ed.), Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors, i. 48–9Google Scholar. I am indebted to the American Historical Association for permission to quote this document. Upon the situation in Virginia, see Flippin, , Royal Government in Virginia, 1624–1775, pp. 147, 166–7, 169, 174–5, 205Google Scholar.
page 174 note 2 Labaree, , Royal Government in America, pp. 167–71Google Scholar.
page 175 note 1 Labaree, (ed.), Royal Instructions to British Colonial Governors, i. 209Google Scholar.
page 176 note 1 Cf. Sanders, J. B., Evolution of the Executive Departments of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1935)Google Scholar.
page 176 note 2 Learned, H. B., The President's Cabinet (New Haven, 1912), pp. 90–4Google Scholar; cf. Sanders, , op. cit., pp. 187–8Google Scholar.
page 176 note 3 Learned, , op. cit., p. 93Google Scholar.
page 176 note 4 Ibid., pp. 100–5; Sanders, , op. cit., pp. 191–2Google Scholar.
page 176 note 5 Learned, , op. cit., pp. 350–1Google Scholar.
page 176 note 6 Labaree, , op. cit., i. 29Google Scholar.